Hu Jiun-Ruey, Martin Gabrielle, Iyengar Sanjna, Kovell Lara C, Plante Timothy B, Helmond Noud van, Dart Richard A, Brady Tammy M, Turkson-Ocran Ruth-Alma N, Juraschek Stephen P
Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
University of Massachusetts Chan School of Medicine, Worcester, Massachusetts.
Cardiovasc Digit Health J. 2023 Jan 16;4(1):9-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.01.001. eCollection 2023 Feb.
Cuff-based home blood pressure (BP) devices, which have been the standard for BP monitoring for decades, are limited by physical discomfort, convenience, and their ability to capture BP variability and patterns between intermittent readings. In recent years, cuffless BP devices, which do not require cuff inflation around a limb, have entered the market, offering the promise of continuous beat-to-beat measurement of BP. These devices take advantage of a variety of principles to determine BP, including (1) pulse arrival time, (2) pulse transit time, (3) pulse wave analysis, (4) volume clamping, and (5) applanation tonometry. Because BP is calculated indirectly, these devices require calibration with cuff-based devices at regular intervals. Unfortunately, the pace of regulation of these devices has failed to match the speed of innovation and direct availability to patient consumers. There is an urgent need to develop a consensus on standards by which cuffless BP devices can be tested for accuracy. In this narrative review, we describe the landscape of cuffless BP devices, summarize the current status of validation protocols, and provide recommendations for an ideal validation process for these devices.
几十年来一直作为血压监测标准的基于袖带的家用血压设备,受到身体不适、便利性以及捕捉间歇性读数之间血压变异性和模式能力的限制。近年来,无需在肢体周围充气袖带的无袖带血压设备已进入市场,有望实现连续逐搏血压测量。这些设备利用多种原理来测定血压,包括(1)脉搏到达时间,(2)脉搏传输时间,(3)脉搏波分析,(4)容积钳夹,以及(5)压平式眼压测量法。由于血压是间接计算得出的,这些设备需要定期用基于袖带的设备进行校准。不幸的是,这些设备的监管步伐未能跟上创新速度以及患者消费者直接获取设备的速度。迫切需要就无袖带血压设备准确性测试标准达成共识。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们描述了无袖带血压设备的情况,总结了验证方案的现状,并为这些设备的理想验证过程提供建议。