• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊腹腔镜手术在复杂性憩室病中的作用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

The role of emergency laparoscopic surgery for complicated diverticular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Lin Hongwei, Zhuang Zhuonan, Huang Xin, Li Yuanxin

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

Center of Hepatopancreatobiliary Diseases, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 2;99(40):e22421. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022421.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000022421
PMID:33019419
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7535780/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic surgery develops rapidly in both elective and emergency settings. The study aimed to determine the role of different laparoscopic methods for the emergency treatment of complicated diverticulitis.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, and the Cochrane database were searched up to November 2019 to identify all published articles related to the topic. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 15.

RESULTS

Fourteen publications were included in the analysis. Laparoscopic surgery was applied in 425 patients, and 493 patients underwent open colon resection (OCR). Postoperative mortality, morbidity, severe complications, and reoperation rates were not significantly different between the laparoscopic and open surgery groups. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the different laparoscopic methods (laparoscopic colon resection [LCR] and laparoscopic lavage and drainage [LLD]). Subgroup analysis indicated that LCR was superior to OCR in terms of morbidity, while OCR was superior to LLD in terms of severe complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The safety of laparoscopic surgery for the emergency treatment of complicated diverticulitis is related to different surgical methods. LCR is suggested to be a better choice according to the postoperative outcomes. More definite conclusions can be drawn in future randomized controlled trials.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜手术在择期和急诊手术中均发展迅速。本研究旨在确定不同腹腔镜手术方法在复杂憩室炎急诊治疗中的作用。

方法

检索截至2019年11月的MEDLINE、EMBASE、科学引文索引扩展版和Cochrane数据库,以识别所有已发表的与该主题相关的文章。使用Stata 15进行统计分析。

结果

14篇出版物纳入分析。425例患者接受了腹腔镜手术,493例患者接受了开放性结肠切除术(OCR)。腹腔镜手术组和开放手术组的术后死亡率、发病率、严重并发症和再次手术率无显著差异。基于不同的腹腔镜手术方法(腹腔镜结肠切除术[LCR]和腹腔镜灌洗引流术[LLD])进行亚组分析。亚组分析表明,LCR在发病率方面优于OCR,而OCR在严重并发症方面优于LLD。

结论

腹腔镜手术用于复杂憩室炎急诊治疗的安全性与不同的手术方法有关。根据术后结果,建议LCR是更好的选择。未来的随机对照试验可得出更明确的结论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0264/7535780/0aff1cbf970a/medi-99-e22421-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0264/7535780/c9d8ab7ff1d7/medi-99-e22421-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0264/7535780/17c355a83ec9/medi-99-e22421-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0264/7535780/8f3ccfa9886c/medi-99-e22421-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0264/7535780/4b759501129f/medi-99-e22421-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0264/7535780/0aff1cbf970a/medi-99-e22421-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0264/7535780/c9d8ab7ff1d7/medi-99-e22421-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0264/7535780/17c355a83ec9/medi-99-e22421-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0264/7535780/8f3ccfa9886c/medi-99-e22421-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0264/7535780/4b759501129f/medi-99-e22421-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0264/7535780/0aff1cbf970a/medi-99-e22421-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
The role of emergency laparoscopic surgery for complicated diverticular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.急诊腹腔镜手术在复杂性憩室病中的作用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 2;99(40):e22421. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022421.
2
Laparoscopic versus open colonic resection for complicated diverticular disease in the emergency setting: a safe choice? A retrospective comparative cohort study.急诊情况下腹腔镜与开放结肠切除术治疗复杂性憩室病:是一种安全的选择吗?一项回顾性比较队列研究。
Am J Surg. 2015 Jun;209(6):992-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.07.017. Epub 2014 Oct 12.
3
Laparoscopic Lavage vs Primary Resection for Acute Perforated Diverticulitis: The SCANDIV Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜灌洗与一期切除术治疗急性穿孔性憩室炎:SCANDIV 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2015 Oct 6;314(13):1364-75. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.12076.
4
Is laparoscopic lavage safe in purulent diverticulitis versus colonic resection? A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜灌洗治疗脓性憩室炎与结肠切除术相比是否安全?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2019 Nov;71:182-189. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.10.007. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
5
Laparoscopic lavage versus surgical resection for acute diverticulitis with generalised peritonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜灌洗术与手术切除治疗伴有弥漫性腹膜炎的急性憩室炎:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Feb;21(2):93-110. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1585-0. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
6
Laparoscopic Approach in Colonic Diverticulitis: Dispelling Myths and Misperceptions.腹腔镜治疗结肠憩室炎:消除误解与错误认知
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Apr;27(2):73-82. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000386.
7
Predictive risk factors for intra- and postoperative complications in 526 laparoscopic sigmoid resections due to recurrent diverticulitis: a multivariate analysis.526 例因复发性憩室炎而行腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术的术中及术后并发症的预测性风险因素:多因素分析。
World J Surg. 2011 Mar;35(3):677-83. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0889-2.
8
Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for complicated diverticulitis is safe: review of 576 consecutive colectomies.腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术治疗复杂性憩室炎是安全的:对576例连续结肠切除术的回顾
Surg Endosc. 2016 Apr;30(4):1629-34. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4393-5. Epub 2015 Aug 15.
9
Robotic pelvic dissection as surgical treatment of complicated diverticulitis in elective settings: a comparative study with fully laparoscopic procedure.机器人盆腔解剖作为择期手术治疗复杂憩室炎的方法:与完全腹腔镜手术的对比研究。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Aug;33(8):2583-2590. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6553-x. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
10
Laparoscopic surgery for complicated diverticular disease: a single-centre experience.腹腔镜手术治疗复杂憩室病:单中心经验。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Oct;14(10):1248-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02924.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Essential updates 2020/2021: Colorectal diseases (benign)-Current topics in the surgical and medical treatment of benign colorectal diseases.2020/2021年重要更新:结直肠疾病(良性)——良性结直肠疾病外科及内科治疗的当前热点
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2022 Jan 25;6(3):321-335. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12548. eCollection 2022 May.
2
Long-Term Functional Results of a Modified Caudal-to-Cranial Approach in Laparoscopic Segmental Left Colectomy for Diverticular Disease.改良尾侧向头侧入路在腹腔镜乙状结肠憩室病节段性左半结肠切除术中的长期功能结果
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2021 Jan 11;2021:8940682. doi: 10.1155/2021/8940682. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of emergency laparoscopic colectomy for complicated sigmoid diverticulits: A systematic review and meta-analysis.急危重症腹腔镜结肠切除术治疗复杂性乙状结肠憩室炎的作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surgeon. 2019 Dec;17(6):360-369. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
2
Two-year results of the randomized clinical trial DILALA comparing laparoscopic lavage with resection as treatment for perforated diverticulitis.DILALA 随机临床试验的两年结果比较了腹腔镜灌洗与切除术治疗穿孔性憩室炎的效果。
Br J Surg. 2018 Aug;105(9):1128-1134. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10839. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
3
Bayesian network meta-analysis of the effects of single-incision laparoscopic surgery, conventional laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy for the treatment of acute appendicitis.
单孔腹腔镜手术、传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术及开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎效果的贝叶斯网络Meta分析
Exp Ther Med. 2017 Dec;14(6):5908-5916. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.5343. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
4
Hartmann's Procedure or Primary Anastomosis for Generalized Peritonitis due to Perforated Diverticulitis: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Trial (DIVERTI).Hartmann手术与原发性吻合术治疗因憩室炎穿孔所致弥漫性腹膜炎:一项前瞻性多中心随机试验(DIVERTI)
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Dec;225(6):798-805. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
5
Laparoscopic lavage versus surgical resection for acute diverticulitis with generalised peritonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜灌洗术与手术切除治疗伴有弥漫性腹膜炎的急性憩室炎:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Feb;21(2):93-110. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1585-0. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
6
Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗穿孔性消化性溃疡:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2016 Sep;33 Pt A:124-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.07.077. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
7
Systematic review and meta-analysis for laparoscopic versus open colon surgery with or without an ERAS programme.针对有或没有加速康复外科(ERAS)方案的腹腔镜与开放结肠手术的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Dec;29(12):3443-53. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4148-3. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
8
Laparoscopic Lavage Is Feasible and Safe for the Treatment of Perforated Diverticulitis With Purulent Peritonitis: The First Results From the Randomized Controlled Trial DILALA.腹腔镜灌洗治疗伴有脓性腹膜炎的穿孔性憩室炎可行且安全:随机对照试验DILALA的初步结果
Ann Surg. 2016 Jan;263(1):117-22. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001061.
9
The ACTIVE (Acute Cholecystitis Trial Invasive Versus Endoscopic) Study: multicenter randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for acute cholecystitis.ACTIVE(急性胆囊炎侵入性与内镜治疗对比)研究:一项关于急性胆囊炎腹腔镜手术与开放手术的多中心随机、双盲、对照试验。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2013 Oct;60(127):1552-6.
10
Practice parameters for the treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis.乙状结肠憩室炎治疗的实践参数。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Mar;57(3):284-94. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000075.