• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“关爱”(CARITAS)的混合方法评估:一种针对痴呆症的医院到社区综合护理模式

Mixed-method evaluation of CARITAS: a hospital-to-community model of integrated care for dementia.

作者信息

Ha Ngoc Huong Lien, Chan Ivana, Yap Philip, Nurjono Milawaty, Vrijhoef Hubertus J M, Nicholas Sean Olivia, Wee Shiou-Liang

机构信息

Geriatric Education and Research Institute, Singapore.

Department of Geriatric Medicine, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 5;10(10):e039017. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039017.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039017
PMID:33020104
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7537438/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The capability and capacity of the primary and community care (PCC) sector for dementia in Singapore may be enhanced through better integration. Through a partnership involving a tertiary hospital and PCC providers, an integrated dementia care network (CARITAS: comprehensive, accessible, responsive, individualised, transdisciplinary, accountable and seamless) was implemented. The study evaluated the process and extent of integration within CARITAS.

DESIGN

Triangulation mixed-methods design and analyses were employed to understand factors underpinning network mechanisms.

SETTING

The study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in the northern region of Singapore.

PARTICIPANTS

We recruited participants who were involved in the conceptualisation, design, development and implementation of the CARITAS Programme from a tertiary hospital and PCC providers.

INTERVENTION

We used the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care-Measurement Tool (RMIC-MT) to assess integration from managerial perspectives. RMIC-MT comprises eight dimensions that play interconnected roles on a macro-level, meso-level and microlevel. We administered RMIC-MT to healthcare providers and conducted in-depth interviews with key CARITAS stakeholders.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

We assessed integration scores across eight dimensions of the RMIC-MT and factors underpinning network mechanisms.

RESULTS

Compared with other dimensions, functional integration (mechanisms by which information and management modalities are linked) achieved the lowest mean score of 55. Other dimensions (eg, clinical, professional and organisational integration) scored about 70. Presence of inspiring clinical leaders and tacit interdependencies among partners strengthened the network. However, the lack of structured documentation and a shared information-technology platform hindered functional integration.

CONCLUSION

CARITAS has reached maturity in micro-levels and meso-levels of integration, while macro-integration needs further development. Integration can be enhanced by assessing service gaps, increasing engagement with stakeholders and providing a shared communication system.

摘要

目标

通过更好的整合,可以提高新加坡基层和社区护理(PCC)部门应对痴呆症的能力。通过一家三级医院与PCC提供者的合作,实施了一个综合痴呆症护理网络(慈善关爱:全面、可及、响应性、个性化、跨学科、问责且无缝)。该研究评估了慈善关爱网络内整合的过程和程度。

设计

采用三角混合方法设计和分析,以了解支撑网络机制的因素。

地点

该研究在新加坡北部地区的一家三级医院进行。

参与者

我们从一家三级医院和PCC提供者中招募了参与慈善关爱项目概念化、设计、开发和实施的人员。

干预措施

我们使用综合护理彩虹模型测量工具(RMIC-MT)从管理角度评估整合情况。RMIC-MT包括八个维度,这些维度在宏观、中观和微观层面发挥着相互关联的作用。我们对医疗保健提供者进行了RMIC-MT评估,并对慈善关爱项目的关键利益相关者进行了深入访谈。

主要和次要结果指标

我们评估了RMIC-MT八个维度的整合得分以及支撑网络机制的因素。

结果

与其他维度相比,功能整合(信息和管理模式相联系的机制)的平均得分最低,为55分。其他维度(如临床、专业和组织整合)得分约为70分。有鼓舞人心的临床领导者以及合作伙伴之间的默契相互依存关系加强了网络。然而,缺乏结构化文档和共享信息技术平台阻碍了功能整合。

结论

慈善关爱在微观和中观层面的整合已达到成熟水平,而宏观整合需要进一步发展。通过评估服务差距、增加与利益相关者的互动以及提供共享通信系统,可以加强整合。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8463/7537438/e6e491fcf5c5/bmjopen-2020-039017f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8463/7537438/fdf03b329363/bmjopen-2020-039017f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8463/7537438/e6e491fcf5c5/bmjopen-2020-039017f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8463/7537438/fdf03b329363/bmjopen-2020-039017f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8463/7537438/e6e491fcf5c5/bmjopen-2020-039017f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Mixed-method evaluation of CARITAS: a hospital-to-community model of integrated care for dementia.“关爱”(CARITAS)的混合方法评估:一种针对痴呆症的医院到社区综合护理模式
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 5;10(10):e039017. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039017.
2
Evaluating the Outcomes of a Hospital-to-Community Model of Integrated Care for Dementia.评估痴呆症医院-社区整合护理模式的结果。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2020;49(6):598-603. doi: 10.1159/000512290. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
3
Shifting care from hospital to community, a strategy to integrate care in Singapore: process evaluation of implementation fidelity.将医疗护理从医院转移到社区,是新加坡整合医疗服务的一项策略:实施一致性的过程评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 24;20(1):452. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05263-w.
4
Exploring the psychometric properties of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care measurement tool for care providers in Australia.探索澳大利亚护理人员综合护理测量工具彩虹模型的心理测量特性。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 18;9(12):e027920. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027920.
5
Facilitators and Barriers of Integrated Care for Older Adults with Multimorbidity: A Descriptive Qualitative Study.老年多病患者整合照护的促进因素和障碍:描述性定性研究。
Clin Interv Aging. 2023 Nov 29;18:1973-1983. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S436294. eCollection 2023.
6
Implementation of Integrated Care in Singapore: A Complex Adaptive System Perspective.新加坡综合护理的实施:复杂适应系统视角
Int J Integr Care. 2018 Oct 16;18(4):4. doi: 10.5334/ijic.4174.
7
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
8
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
9
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
10
Appreciative inquiry in evaluating integrated primary oral health services in Quebec Cree communities: a qualitative multiple case study.魁北克克里社区综合性初级口腔卫生服务评估中的欣赏式探询:一项定性多案例研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 28;10(6):e038164. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038164.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors that influence inter-organisational integration: a qualitative exploration of service providers' perspectives from an integrated care initiative.影响组织间整合的因素:对来自一项综合护理倡议的服务提供者观点的定性探索
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 10;25(1):947. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13051-7.
2
Effects of DementiaNet's Community Care Network Approach on Admission Rates and Healthcare Costs: A Longitudinal Cohort Analysis.痴呆症网络社区护理网络方法对住院率和医疗费用的影响:一项纵向队列分析。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7700. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7700. Epub 2023 Oct 28.
3
Patients' and Care Professionals' Evaluation of the Effect of a Hospital Group on Integrated Care in Chinese Urban Health Systems: A Propensity Score Matching and Difference-in-differences Regression Approach.

本文引用的文献

1
Underlying mechanisms of complex interventions addressing the care of older adults with multimorbidity: a realist review.针对多病共存的老年人护理的复杂干预措施的潜在机制:一个现实主义综述。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 3;9(4):e025009. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025009.
2
Implementation fidelity of a strategy to integrate service delivery: learnings from a transitional care program for individuals with complex needs in Singapore.整合服务提供策略的实施保真度:来自新加坡针对有复杂需求个体的过渡性护理项目的经验教训。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Mar 19;19(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-3980-x.
3
Assessing the maturity of the healthcare system for integrated care: testing measurement properties of the SCIROCCO tool.
患者与护理专业人员对医院集团对中国城市卫生系统综合护理效果的评价:倾向得分匹配与双重差分回归方法
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7897. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7897. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
4
Evaluating an Integrated Local System Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Case Study of East Toronto Health Partners.评估针对新冠疫情的综合本地系统响应:东多伦多健康伙伴的案例研究
Int J Integr Care. 2023 Jun 22;23(2):31. doi: 10.5334/ijic.7014. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
5
Identifying Key Themes of Care Coordination for Patients with Chronic Conditions in Singapore: A Scoping Review.识别新加坡慢性病患者护理协调的关键主题:一项范围综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 May 25;11(11):1546. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11111546.
6
Implementation of Integrated Care for the Aged Population in Anhui and Fujian Province of China: A Qualitative Study.中国安徽省和福建省老年人口综合护理的实施:一项定性研究。
Int J Integr Care. 2022 Jun 10;22(2):20. doi: 10.5334/ijic.6419. eCollection 2022 Apr-Jun.
7
Evaluating the safety and patient impacts of an artificial intelligence command centre in acute hospital care: a mixed-methods protocol.评估人工智能指挥中心在急性医院护理中的安全性和患者影响:混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 1;12(3):e054090. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054090.
评估整合照护的医疗体系成熟度:测试 SCIROCCO 工具的测量特性。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Mar 18;19(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0704-1.
4
An Instrument to Measure Maturity of Integrated Care: A First Validation Study.一种衡量综合护理成熟度的工具:首次验证研究。
Int J Integr Care. 2018 Jan 25;18(1):10. doi: 10.5334/ijic.3063.
5
Implementing Information and Communication Technology to Support Community Aged Care Service Integration: Lessons from an Australian Aged Care Provider.实施信息通信技术以支持社区老年护理服务整合:来自澳大利亚一家老年护理服务提供商的经验教训
Int J Integr Care. 2017 Apr 10;17(1):9. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2437.
6
Supporting shared decision-making for older people with multiple health and social care needs: a protocol for a realist synthesis to inform integrated care models.支持有多种健康和社会护理需求的老年人进行共同决策:一项用于为综合护理模式提供信息的现实主义综合研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 7;7(2):e014026. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014026.
7
A Prospective Validation Study of a Rainbow Model of Integrated Care Measurement Tool in Singapore.新加坡综合护理测量工具彩虹模型的前瞻性验证研究。
Int J Integr Care. 2016 Apr 8;16(1):1. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2021.
8
SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process.SQUIRE 2.0(卓越质量改进报告标准):通过详细的共识过程制定的修订版出版指南。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Dec;25(12):986-992. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
9
Towards an international taxonomy of integrated primary care: a Delphi consensus approach.迈向国际综合初级保健分类法:德尔菲共识法。
BMC Fam Pract. 2015 May 22;16:64. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0278-x.
10
Towards a taxonomy for integrated care: a mixed-methods study.迈向整合照护分类学:一项混合方法研究。
Int J Integr Care. 2015 Mar 4;15:e003. doi: 10.5334/ijic.1513. eCollection 2015 Jan-Mar.