Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Graduate School of Public Health & Health Policy, City University of New York (CUNY), New York, New York, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 6;15(10):e0240011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240011. eCollection 2020.
Understanding public perceptions of government responses to COVID-19 may foster improved public cooperation. Trust in government and population risk of exposure may influence public perception of the response. Other population-level characteristics, such as country socio-economic development, COVID-19 morbidity and mortality, and degree of democratic government, may influence perception.
We developed a novel ten-item instrument that asks respondents to rate key aspects of their government's response to the pandemic (COVID-SCORE). We examined whether the results varied by gender, age group, education level, and monthly income. We also examined the internal and external validity of the index using appropriate predefined variables. To test for dimensionality of the results, we used a principal component analysis (PCA) for the ten survey items. We found that Cronbach's alpha was 0.92 and that the first component of the PCA explained 60% of variance with the remaining factors having eigenvalues below 1, strongly indicating that the tool is both reliable and unidimensional. Based on responses from 13,426 people randomly selected from the general population in 19 countries, the mean national scores ranged from 35.76 (Ecuador) to 80.48 (China) out of a maximum of 100 points. Heterogeneity in responses was observed across age, gender, education and income with the greatest amount of heterogeneity observed between countries. National scores correlated with respondents' reported levels of trust in government and with country-level COVID-19 mortality rates.
The COVID-SCORE survey instrument demonstrated satisfactory validity. It may help governments more effectively engage constituents in current and future efforts to control COVID-19. Additional country-specific assessment should be undertaken to measure trends over time and the public perceptions of key aspects of government responses in other countries.
了解公众对政府应对 COVID-19 措施的看法,可能有助于提高公众的合作意愿。公众对政府的信任度和对风险的感知,可能会影响他们对政府应对措施的看法。其他人口层面的特征,如国家社会经济发展水平、COVID-19 的发病率和死亡率,以及政府的民主程度,也可能会影响公众的看法。
我们开发了一种新的十项工具,要求受访者对政府应对大流行的关键方面进行评分(COVID-SCORE)。我们研究了结果是否因性别、年龄组、教育水平和月收入而有所不同。我们还使用了适当的预设变量来检查该指数的内部和外部有效性。为了检验结果的维度性,我们对十项调查项目进行了主成分分析(PCA)。我们发现 Cronbach 的 alpha 值为 0.92,PCA 的第一个组成部分解释了 60%的方差,其余因子的特征值均低于 1,这强烈表明该工具既可靠又具有单一维度。基于从 19 个国家的普通人群中随机抽取的 13426 人的回答,全国平均得分范围从 35.76(厄瓜多尔)到 80.48(中国),满分为 100 分。在年龄、性别、教育程度和收入方面,各国之间的回答存在很大的差异。国家得分与受访者报告的对政府的信任度以及国家层面的 COVID-19 死亡率相关。
COVID-SCORE 调查工具表现出令人满意的有效性。它可以帮助政府更有效地让民众参与到当前和未来的 COVID-19 控制工作中。应进行更多的国家特定评估,以衡量随时间推移的趋势,以及其他国家对政府应对措施的主要方面的公众看法。