• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

联合但分裂:新冠疫情期间欧盟的政策应对与民众认知。

United but divided: Policy responses and people's perceptions in the EU during the COVID-19 outbreak.

机构信息

Nova School of Business and Economics, R. Holanda 1, 2775-405, Carcavelos, Portugal.

Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2020 Sep;124(9):909-918. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.06.009. Epub 2020 Jun 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.06.009
PMID:32631613
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7307992/
Abstract

To understand the public sentiment toward the measures used by policymakers for COVID-19 containment, a survey among representative samples of the population in seven European countries was carried out in the first two weeks of April 2020. The study addressed people's support for containment policies, worries about COVID-19 consequences, and trust in sources of information. Citizens were overall satisfied with their government's response to the pandemic; however, the extent of approval differed across countries and policy measures. A north-south divide in public opinion was noticeable across the European states. It was particularly pronounced for intrusive policy measures, such as mobile data use for movement tracking, economic concerns, and trust in the information from the national government. Considerable differences in people's attitudes were noticed within countries, especially across individual regions and age groups. The findings suggest that the epidemic acts as a stressor, causing health and economic anxieties even in households that were not directly affected by the virus. At the same time, the burden of stress was unequally distributed across regions and age groups. Based on the data collected, we draw lessons from the containment stage and identify several insights that can facilitate the design of lockdown exit strategies and future containment policies so that a high level of compliance can be expected.

摘要

为了了解公众对政策制定者为遏制 COVID-19 而采取的措施的看法,在 2020 年 4 月的前两周,对七个欧洲国家的代表性人群进行了一项调查。该研究涉及人们对遏制政策的支持、对 COVID-19 后果的担忧以及对信息来源的信任。总体而言,公民对政府应对大流行的反应感到满意;然而,对政策措施的认可程度因国家而异。在欧洲国家中,公众意见存在南北分歧。在一些政策措施上,这种分歧尤为明显,如移动数据在追踪行动中的使用、经济方面的担忧以及对国家政府信息的信任。在各国内部,人们的态度也存在明显差异,尤其是在不同地区和年龄组之间。研究结果表明,疫情是一种压力源,即使在未直接受到病毒影响的家庭中,也会引起健康和经济焦虑。同时,压力的负担在地区和年龄组之间分布不均。根据收集到的数据,我们从遏制阶段吸取教训,并确定了一些见解,这可以为制定封锁退出策略和未来的遏制政策提供便利,从而有望获得高水平的合规性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1281/7307992/7a5ff0f37b92/gr6_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1281/7307992/a851e8ccd733/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1281/7307992/eab542dcd02a/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1281/7307992/f94d8dffc63c/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1281/7307992/f18be8bc5250/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1281/7307992/c17a82ba2903/gr5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1281/7307992/7a5ff0f37b92/gr6_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1281/7307992/a851e8ccd733/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1281/7307992/eab542dcd02a/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1281/7307992/f94d8dffc63c/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1281/7307992/f18be8bc5250/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1281/7307992/c17a82ba2903/gr5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1281/7307992/7a5ff0f37b92/gr6_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
United but divided: Policy responses and people's perceptions in the EU during the COVID-19 outbreak.联合但分裂:新冠疫情期间欧盟的政策应对与民众认知。
Health Policy. 2020 Sep;124(9):909-918. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.06.009. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
2
Online Information Exchange and Anxiety Spread in the Early Stage of the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Outbreak in South Korea: Structural Topic Model and Network Analysis.韩国新型冠状病毒(COVID-19)疫情早期的在线信息交流与焦虑传播:结构主题模型与网络分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 2;22(6):e19455. doi: 10.2196/19455.
3
Effects of the COVID-19 Emergency and National Lockdown on Italian Citizens' Economic Concerns, Government Trust, and Health Engagement: Evidence From a Two-Wave Panel Study.COVID-19 紧急状态和全国封锁对意大利公民经济担忧、政府信任和健康参与的影响:来自两轮面板研究的证据。
Milbank Q. 2021 Jun;99(2):369-392. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12506. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
4
COVID-SCORE: A global survey to assess public perceptions of government responses to COVID-19 (COVID-SCORE-10).COVID-SCORE:评估公众对政府 COVID-19 应对措施看法的全球调查(COVID-SCORE-10)。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 6;15(10):e0240011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240011. eCollection 2020.
5
Use of Rapid Online Surveys to Assess People's Perceptions During Infectious Disease Outbreaks: A Cross-sectional Survey on COVID-19.利用快速在线调查评估传染病暴发期间人们的认知:一项关于新冠肺炎的横断面调查
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 2;22(4):e18790. doi: 10.2196/18790.
6
Public perspectives on protective measures during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands, Germany and Italy: A survey study.公众对荷兰、德国和意大利 COVID-19 大流行期间防护措施的看法:一项调查研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 5;15(8):e0236917. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236917. eCollection 2020.
7
Citizens' Adherence to COVID-19 Mitigation Recommendations by the Government: A 3-Country Comparative Evaluation Using Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey Data.公民对政府新冠疫情缓解建议的遵守情况:基于网络横断面调查数据的三国比较评估
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 11;22(8):e20634. doi: 10.2196/20634.
8
South Africans' understanding of and response to the COVID-19 outbreak: An online survey.南非人对 COVID-19 疫情的理解和反应:一项在线调查。
S Afr Med J. 2020 Aug 11;110(9):894-902.
9
Diabolical dilemmas of COVID-19: An empirical study into Dutch society's trade-offs between health impacts and other effects of the lockdown.新冠疫情的险恶困境:对荷兰社会在封锁的健康影响和其他影响之间权衡取舍的实证研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 16;15(9):e0238683. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238683. eCollection 2020.
10
Assessing concerns for the economic consequence of the COVID-19 response and mental health problems associated with economic vulnerability and negative economic shock in Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom.评估意大利、西班牙和英国对 COVID-19 应对措施的经济后果的担忧,以及与经济脆弱性和负面经济冲击相关的心理健康问题。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 27;15(10):e0240876. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240876. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Adolescence and online vulnerability: The role of fear of missing out (FoMO): A cross-sectional study during the third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.青春期与网络易损性:错失恐惧(FoMO)的作用:一项在新冠疫情第三波期间开展的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 15;20(9):e0332147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0332147. eCollection 2025.
2
Teachers' demographics, mindfulness skills, and anxiety predict COVID-19 vaccination status.教师的人口统计学特征、正念技能和焦虑状况可预测新冠疫苗接种情况。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 8;25(1):2415. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23478-6.
3
The citizen's perception of a shared responsibility during the COVID-19 management: Insights from a focus group study across four European countries.

本文引用的文献

1
A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker).一个全球性的大流行病政策面板数据库(牛津 COVID-19 政府应对追踪器)。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;5(4):529-538. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
2
Answering the right questions for policymakers on COVID-19.为政策制定者解答有关新冠疫情的正确问题。
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Jun;8(6):e768-e769. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30191-1. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
3
The race against COVID-19.与新冠病毒的赛跑。
公民对新冠疫情管理期间共同责任的认知:来自四个欧洲国家焦点小组研究的见解
PLoS One. 2025 May 27;20(5):e0322019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322019. eCollection 2025.
4
Does timing matter? The role of health information shocks in measuring willingness to pay.时机重要吗?健康信息冲击在衡量支付意愿中的作用。
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Apr 17. doi: 10.1007/s10198-025-01774-7.
5
Impact of Dark Triad personality traits on COVID-19 vaccination uptake and prevention efforts: insights from the European Covid Survey (ECOS).黑暗三性格特质对新冠疫苗接种率及预防工作的影响:来自欧洲新冠调查(ECOS)的见解
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 10;25(1):1352. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22471-3.
6
Trading-off health safety, civil liberties, and unemployment based on communication strategies: the social dilemma in fighting pandemics.基于沟通策略权衡健康安全、公民自由和失业问题:抗击疫情中的社会困境
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 3;20(3):e0318541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318541. eCollection 2025.
7
Model predicted human mobility explains COVID-19 transmission in urban space without behavioral data.模型预测的人类流动性在没有行为数据的情况下解释了城市空间中的新冠病毒传播。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 21;15(1):6365. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87363-3.
8
A solution to the pervasive problem of response bias in self-reports.自我报告中普遍存在的反应偏差问题的一种解决方案。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jan 21;122(3):e2412807122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2412807122. Epub 2025 Jan 17.
9
From polarity to plurality: Perceptions of COVID-19 and policy measures in England and Scotland.从两极到多元:英格兰和苏格兰对 COVID-19 及政策措施的看法。
Health Expect. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14069. doi: 10.1111/hex.14069.
10
Who continued travelling by public transport during COVID-19? Socioeconomic factors explaining travel behaviour in Stockholm 2020 based on smart card data.在新冠疫情期间,哪些人仍继续乘坐公共交通工具出行?基于智能卡数据剖析2020年斯德哥尔摩出行行为的社会经济因素。
Eur Transp Res Rev. 2021;13(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12544-021-00488-0. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
Nat Nanotechnol. 2020 Apr;15(4):239-240. doi: 10.1038/s41565-020-0680-y.
4
On the responsible use of digital data to tackle the COVID-19 pandemic.关于负责任地使用数字数据来应对 COVID-19 大流行。
Nat Med. 2020 Apr;26(4):463-464. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0832-5.