Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, Université de Toulouse III, Toulouse, France.
Inserm, U1048 and Université Toulouse III, I2MC, Toulouse, France.
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2021 Oct;6(4):402-408. doi: 10.1177/2380084420963933. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
Pediatric dentists sometimes have to care for children who refuse to cooperate with the oral examination or dental treatment. Behavior management strategies are used, such as "tell-show-do," distraction, and positive reinforcement. Anxiety management can also be performed by the use of conscious sedation (oral premedication, nitrous oxide/oxygen inhalation). Unfortunately, these techniques are sometimes insufficient for providing oral care, and protective stabilization may be an option in some situations. Little is known on the impact of physical restraint and how practitioners feel about it. The objective of this study was to evaluate the perception of dentists using protective stabilization for dental care in children.
Semistructured qualitative interviews on the perception of pediatric dentists concerning protective stabilization were conducted in the pediatric dentistry department of the University Hospital of Toulouse, France. A thematic analysis of interview transcripts was provided via NVivo software.
This analysis highlighted 3 main themes. First, the perceptions of dentists concerning protective stabilization showed that this procedure has a major psychological impact and led to a feeling of professional failure. Second, the reasons for which the child was stabilized were described; these concerned the child (behavior, age, number of treatments) and the environment (the parents and the medical team). Finally, we detailed how dentists manage the effects of using of protective stabilization.
Dental surgeons must balance their requirement to make concrete decisions regarding the provision of care with their personal convictions about protective stabilization. This study also shows the need for specific training on this subject, as well as the desire of certain dentists that public authorities implement legislation on this matter.
The findings of this study will improve the management of young patients by identifying situations where protective stabilization may be useful (age of the child, diagnosis, protection of the child or the medical team), while showing its psychological impact on practitioners. Finally, this work provides a basis for decision makers to propose a framework for the use of physical restraint.
儿科牙医有时需要照顾拒绝配合口腔检查或牙科治疗的儿童。会使用行为管理策略,如“告知-示范-操作”、分散注意力和正强化。也可以通过使用镇静(口服预备药、氧化亚氮/氧气吸入)来管理焦虑。不幸的是,这些技术有时不足以提供口腔护理,在某些情况下,保护固定可能是一种选择。对于身体约束的影响以及从业者的感受知之甚少。本研究的目的是评估牙医在为儿童提供口腔护理时使用保护固定的看法。
在法国图卢兹大学医院的儿科牙科部门对儿科牙医使用保护固定的看法进行了半结构化定性访谈。通过 NVivo 软件对访谈记录进行了主题分析。
该分析突出了 3 个主要主题。首先,牙医对保护固定的看法表明,该程序具有重大的心理影响,并导致了职业失败感。其次,描述了使儿童稳定的原因;这些原因涉及儿童(行为、年龄、治疗次数)和环境(父母和医疗团队)。最后,我们详细介绍了牙医如何应对使用保护固定的影响。
牙科医生必须在提供护理的具体决策与其对保护固定的个人信念之间取得平衡。这项研究还表明,需要对此主题进行专门培训,并且某些牙医希望公共当局就此问题制定法规。
本研究的结果将通过确定保护固定可能有用的情况(儿童的年龄、诊断、儿童或医疗团队的保护)来改善对年轻患者的管理,同时展示其对从业者的心理影响。最后,这项工作为决策者提供了一个框架,用于使用身体约束。