• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Linking the Mini-Mental State Examination, the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale and the Severe Impairment Battery: evidence from individual participant data from five randomised clinical trials of donepezil.将简易精神状态检查、阿尔茨海默病评估量表认知分量表和严重损害电池联系起来:来自五项多奈哌齐随机临床试验的个体参与者数据的证据。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2021 May;24(2):56-61. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2020-300184. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
2
Normative Data of Mini-Mental State Examination, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale of Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Taiwan.台湾地区社区居住的老年人群体中简易精神状态检查、蒙特利尔认知评估和阿尔茨海默病评估量表认知分量表的常模数据。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2022;51(4):365-376. doi: 10.1159/000525615. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
3
Effects of memantine on cognition in patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease: post-hoc analyses of ADAS-cog and SIB total and single-item scores from six randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies.美金刚对中重度阿尔茨海默病患者认知功能的影响:来自 6 项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究的 ADAS-cog 和 SIB 总分及单项评分的事后分析。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009 May;24(5):532-8. doi: 10.1002/gps.2226.
4
A long-term comparison of galantamine and donepezil in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.加兰他敏与多奈哌齐治疗阿尔茨海默病的长期比较
Drugs Aging. 2003;20(10):777-89. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200320100-00006.
5
Shortening the Alzheimer's disease assessment scale cognitive subscale.缩短阿尔茨海默病评估量表认知分量表。
Eur Psychiatry. 2024 Feb 23;67(1):e19. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.14.
6
Psychometric evaluation of ADAS-Cog and NTB for measuring drug response.ADAS-Cog 和 NTB 量表用于测量药物反应的心理计量学评估。
Acta Neurol Scand. 2014 Feb;129(2):114-22. doi: 10.1111/ane.12153. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
7
How Do Scores on the ADAS-Cog, MMSE, and CDR-SOB Correspond?阿尔茨海默病协作研究认知量表(ADAS-Cog)、简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)和临床痴呆评定量表-总和版(CDR-SOB)的评分如何对应?
Clin Neuropsychol. 2015;29(7):1002-9. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2015.1119312. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
8
Predictors of placebo group decline in the Alzheimer's disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) in 24 week clinical trials of Alzheimer's disease.阿尔茨海默病24周临床试验中,安慰剂组在阿尔茨海默病评估量表认知分量表(ADAS-Cog)上下降的预测因素。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2008 Jul;14(3):301-11. doi: 10.3233/jad-2008-14304.
9
Evaluation of an 8-item Severe Impairment Battery (SIB-8) vs. the full SIB in moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease patients participating in a donepezil study.评估 8 项严重障碍电池(SIB-8)与在多奈哌齐研究中参与的中度至重度阿尔茨海默病患者的完整 SIB。
Int J Clin Pract. 2013 Oct;67(10):1050-6. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12188.
10
The ADAS-cog in Alzheimer's disease clinical trials: psychometric evaluation of the sum and its parts.阿尔茨海默病临床试验中的 ADAS-cog:总和及其部分的心理测量评估。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010 Dec;81(12):1363-8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.204008. Epub 2010 Sep 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Validity, reliability, measurement invariance, and equipercentile linking of the depression anxiety stress scale-21 in the youth population in Singapore.新加坡青年人群中抑郁焦虑压力量表-21的效度、信度、测量不变性及等百分位等值性
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 19;16:1563190. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1563190. eCollection 2025.
2
Characterizing heterogeneity in Alzheimer's disease progression: a semiparametric model.表征阿尔茨海默病进展中的异质性:一种半参数模型。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 5;15(1):7660. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92540-5.
3
Unlocking the Potential of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Alzheimer's Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials to Optimize Intervention Strategies.解锁重复经颅磁刺激在阿尔茨海默病中的潜力:优化干预策略的随机临床试验荟萃分析。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2024;98(2):481-503. doi: 10.3233/JAD-231031.
4
Mapping new pharmacological interventions for cognitive function in Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials.探寻阿尔茨海默病认知功能的新型药物干预措施:随机临床试验的系统评价
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Jun 1;14:1190604. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1190604. eCollection 2023.
5
Carpe diem.及时行乐。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2022 Nov;25(4):143-144. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2022-300608.
6
Pharmacotherapy of Alzheimer's disease: an overview of systematic reviews.阿尔茨海默病的药物治疗:系统评价综述。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Oct;78(10):1567-1587. doi: 10.1007/s00228-022-03363-6. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
7
The Effects of High-Intensity Functional Training on Cognition in Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review.高强度功能训练对认知障碍老年人认知功能的影响:一项系统综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Apr 2;10(4):670. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10040670.
8
Serum folate deficiency and the risks of dementia and all-cause mortality: a national study of old age.血清叶酸缺乏与痴呆和全因死亡率的风险:一项针对老年人的全国性研究。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2022 May;25(2):63-68. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2021-300309. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
9
Personalised treatment for cognitive impairment in dementia: development and validation of an artificial intelligence model.个体化痴呆认知障碍治疗:人工智能模型的开发和验证。
BMC Med. 2022 Feb 1;20(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02250-2.
10
How can we estimate QALYs based on PHQ-9 scores? Equipercentile linking analysis of PHQ-9 and EQ-5D.我们如何根据患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)评分来估算质量调整生命年(QALYs)?PHQ-9与欧洲五维度健康量表(EQ-5D)的等百分位链接分析。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2021 Mar 2;24(3):97-101. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2020-300240.

本文引用的文献

1
Translating the BDI and BDI-II into the HAMD and vice versa with equipercentile linking.用等百分位链接将 BDI 和 BDI-II 翻译成 HAMD 及反之。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 Mar 14;29:e24. doi: 10.1017/S2045796019000088.
2
Primary Endpoints in Current Phase II/III Trials for Alzheimer Disease: A Systematic Survey of Trials Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov.当前阿尔茨海默病 II/III 期临床试验的主要终点:对 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册试验的系统调查。
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2020 Jan-Mar;34(1):97-100. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000297.
3
equate: Observed-Score Linking and Equating in R.等同:R语言中的观测分数链接与等同
Appl Psychol Meas. 2016 Jul;40(5):361-362. doi: 10.1177/0146621615620553. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
4
Challenges in end-of-life dementia care.临终期痴呆症护理的挑战。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2018 Aug;21(3):107-111. doi: 10.1136/eb-2018-102889. Epub 2018 May 18.
5
The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog): Modifications and Responsiveness in Pre-Dementia Populations. A Narrative Review.阿尔茨海默病评估量表认知分量表(ADAS-Cog):在痴呆前人群中的修改和反应性。一项叙述性综述。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;63(2):423-444. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170991.
6
Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation.相关系数:合理使用与解释。
Anesth Analg. 2018 May;126(5):1763-1768. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864.
7
Translating the HAM-D into the MADRS and vice versa with equipercentile linking.用等百分位链接将 HAM-D 翻译成 MADRS,反之亦然。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Jan 15;226:326-331. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.09.042. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
8
Bridging cognitive screening tests in neurologic disorders: A crosswalk between the short Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Mini-Mental State Examination.神经系统疾病中的衔接性认知筛查测试:简短蒙特利尔认知评估与简易精神状态检查表之间的对照
Alzheimers Dement. 2017 Aug;13(8):947-952. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2017.01.015. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
9
How Do Scores on the ADAS-Cog, MMSE, and CDR-SOB Correspond?阿尔茨海默病协作研究认知量表(ADAS-Cog)、简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)和临床痴呆评定量表-总和版(CDR-SOB)的评分如何对应?
Clin Neuropsychol. 2015;29(7):1002-9. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2015.1119312. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
10
Identifying clinically meaningful symptom response cut-off values on the SANS in predominant negative symptoms.在以阴性症状为主的患者中,确定 SANS 中具有临床意义的症状缓解截断值。
Schizophr Res. 2013 Apr;145(1-3):125-7. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2012.12.032. Epub 2013 Feb 8.

将简易精神状态检查、阿尔茨海默病评估量表认知分量表和严重损害电池联系起来:来自五项多奈哌齐随机临床试验的个体参与者数据的证据。

Linking the Mini-Mental State Examination, the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale and the Severe Impairment Battery: evidence from individual participant data from five randomised clinical trials of donepezil.

机构信息

Department of Community Mental Health, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel

Department of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/ School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

Evid Based Ment Health. 2021 May;24(2):56-61. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2020-300184. Epub 2020 Oct 6.

DOI:10.1136/ebmental-2020-300184
PMID:33023920
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10231617/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) and the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB) are widely used rating scales to assess cognition in Alzheimer's disease.

OBJECTIVE

To understand the correspondence between these rating scales, we aimed to examine the linkage of MMSE with the ADAS-Cog and SIB total and change scores.

METHODS

We used individual-level data on participants with Alzheimer's disease (n=2925) from five pivotal clinical trials of donepezil. Data were collected at baseline and scheduled visits for up to 6 months. We used equipercentile linking to identify the correspondence between simultaneous measurements of MMSE with ADAS-Cog, and SIB total and change ratings.

FINDINGS

Spearman's correlation coefficients were of strong magnitude between the MMSE total score and the ADAS-Cog (rs from -0.82 to -0.87; p<0.05) and SIB total scores (rs from 0.70 to 0.75; p<0.05). Weaker correlations between the change scores were observed between the MMSE change score and the ADAS-Cog (week 1: r=-0.11, p=0.18; rs thereafter: -0.28 to -0.45; p<0.05) and SIB change scores (rs from 0.31 to 0.44; p<0.05). Linking suggested that the MMSE total scores were sensitive to moderate and severe cognitive impairment levels. Despite weak to moderate correlations for the change scores, moderate change levels linked well, indicating ceiling and floor effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The current results can be used in meta-analyses, data harmonisation and may contribute to increasing statistical power when pooling data from multiple sources.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The current study results help clinicians to understand these cognitive rating scale scores.

摘要

背景

简易精神状态检查(MMSE)、阿尔茨海默病评估量表认知分量表(ADAS-Cog)和严重障碍电池(SIB)是广泛用于评估阿尔茨海默病认知功能的评分量表。

目的

为了了解这些评分量表之间的对应关系,我们旨在检验 MMSE 与 ADAS-Cog 和 SIB 总分及变化分数的关联性。

方法

我们使用多奈哌齐 5 项关键性临床试验中 2925 名阿尔茨海默病患者的个体水平数据。数据在基线和 6 个月的定期访视时收集。我们使用等百分位链接来识别 MMSE 总分与 ADAS-Cog 和 SIB 总分和变化评分的同时测量之间的对应关系。

发现

MMSE 总分与 ADAS-Cog(Spearman 相关系数 rs 范围为-0.82 至-0.87;p<0.05)和 SIB 总分(rs 范围为 0.70 至 0.75;p<0.05)之间的相关性具有很强的量值。在 MMSE 变化评分与 ADAS-Cog(第 1 周:r=-0.11,p=0.18;随后各周:rs 范围为-0.28 至-0.45;p<0.05)和 SIB 变化评分(rs 范围为 0.31 至 0.44;p<0.05)之间观察到较弱的相关性。链接表明,MMSE 总分对中度和重度认知障碍水平敏感。尽管变化评分的相关性较弱到中度,但中度变化水平关联良好,表明存在天花板和地板效应。

结论

目前的结果可用于荟萃分析、数据协调,并有助于在从多个来源汇总数据时增加统计效力。

临床意义

本研究结果有助于临床医生理解这些认知评分量表的评分。