Suppr超能文献

将简易精神状态检查、阿尔茨海默病评估量表认知分量表和严重损害电池联系起来:来自五项多奈哌齐随机临床试验的个体参与者数据的证据。

Linking the Mini-Mental State Examination, the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale and the Severe Impairment Battery: evidence from individual participant data from five randomised clinical trials of donepezil.

机构信息

Department of Community Mental Health, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel

Department of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/ School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

Evid Based Ment Health. 2021 May;24(2):56-61. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2020-300184. Epub 2020 Oct 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) and the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB) are widely used rating scales to assess cognition in Alzheimer's disease.

OBJECTIVE

To understand the correspondence between these rating scales, we aimed to examine the linkage of MMSE with the ADAS-Cog and SIB total and change scores.

METHODS

We used individual-level data on participants with Alzheimer's disease (n=2925) from five pivotal clinical trials of donepezil. Data were collected at baseline and scheduled visits for up to 6 months. We used equipercentile linking to identify the correspondence between simultaneous measurements of MMSE with ADAS-Cog, and SIB total and change ratings.

FINDINGS

Spearman's correlation coefficients were of strong magnitude between the MMSE total score and the ADAS-Cog (rs from -0.82 to -0.87; p<0.05) and SIB total scores (rs from 0.70 to 0.75; p<0.05). Weaker correlations between the change scores were observed between the MMSE change score and the ADAS-Cog (week 1: r=-0.11, p=0.18; rs thereafter: -0.28 to -0.45; p<0.05) and SIB change scores (rs from 0.31 to 0.44; p<0.05). Linking suggested that the MMSE total scores were sensitive to moderate and severe cognitive impairment levels. Despite weak to moderate correlations for the change scores, moderate change levels linked well, indicating ceiling and floor effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The current results can be used in meta-analyses, data harmonisation and may contribute to increasing statistical power when pooling data from multiple sources.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The current study results help clinicians to understand these cognitive rating scale scores.

摘要

背景

简易精神状态检查(MMSE)、阿尔茨海默病评估量表认知分量表(ADAS-Cog)和严重障碍电池(SIB)是广泛用于评估阿尔茨海默病认知功能的评分量表。

目的

为了了解这些评分量表之间的对应关系,我们旨在检验 MMSE 与 ADAS-Cog 和 SIB 总分及变化分数的关联性。

方法

我们使用多奈哌齐 5 项关键性临床试验中 2925 名阿尔茨海默病患者的个体水平数据。数据在基线和 6 个月的定期访视时收集。我们使用等百分位链接来识别 MMSE 总分与 ADAS-Cog 和 SIB 总分和变化评分的同时测量之间的对应关系。

发现

MMSE 总分与 ADAS-Cog(Spearman 相关系数 rs 范围为-0.82 至-0.87;p<0.05)和 SIB 总分(rs 范围为 0.70 至 0.75;p<0.05)之间的相关性具有很强的量值。在 MMSE 变化评分与 ADAS-Cog(第 1 周:r=-0.11,p=0.18;随后各周:rs 范围为-0.28 至-0.45;p<0.05)和 SIB 变化评分(rs 范围为 0.31 至 0.44;p<0.05)之间观察到较弱的相关性。链接表明,MMSE 总分对中度和重度认知障碍水平敏感。尽管变化评分的相关性较弱到中度,但中度变化水平关联良好,表明存在天花板和地板效应。

结论

目前的结果可用于荟萃分析、数据协调,并有助于在从多个来源汇总数据时增加统计效力。

临床意义

本研究结果有助于临床医生理解这些认知评分量表的评分。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
Carpe diem.及时行乐。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2022 Nov;25(4):143-144. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2022-300608.
6
Pharmacotherapy of Alzheimer's disease: an overview of systematic reviews.阿尔茨海默病的药物治疗:系统评价综述。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Oct;78(10):1567-1587. doi: 10.1007/s00228-022-03363-6. Epub 2022 Jul 26.

本文引用的文献

3
equate: Observed-Score Linking and Equating in R.等同:R语言中的观测分数链接与等同
Appl Psychol Meas. 2016 Jul;40(5):361-362. doi: 10.1177/0146621615620553. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
4
Challenges in end-of-life dementia care.临终期痴呆症护理的挑战。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2018 Aug;21(3):107-111. doi: 10.1136/eb-2018-102889. Epub 2018 May 18.
6
Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation.相关系数:合理使用与解释。
Anesth Analg. 2018 May;126(5):1763-1768. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验