Quesada-Cabrera Raul, Parkin Ivan P
Christopher-Ingold Laboratories, Materials Chemistry Center, Department of Chemistry, UCL (University College London), London, United Kingdom.
Front Chem. 2020 Sep 11;8:817. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00817. eCollection 2020.
The long-standing crusade searching for efficient photocatalytic materials has resulted in a vast landscape of promising photocatalysts, as reflected by the number of reviews reported in the last decade. Virtually all of these reviews have focused on quantitative approaches aiming at developing an understanding of the underlying mechanisms behind photocatalytic behavior and the parameters that influence structure-function correlation. Less attention has been paid, however, to qualitative measures around the development and assessment of photocatalysts. These measures will contribute toward narrowing the range of potential photocatalytic materials for widespread applications. The current report provides a critical perspective over some of the main factors affecting the assessment of photocatalytic materials as a code of good practice. A case of study is also provided, where this qualitative analysis is applied to one of the most prolific materials of the last-decade, disorder-engineered, black titanium dioxide (TiO).
长期以来对高效光催化材料的探索催生了大量有前景的光催化剂,过去十年发表的综述数量就反映了这一点。几乎所有这些综述都集中在定量方法上,旨在深入了解光催化行为背后的潜在机制以及影响结构 - 功能相关性的参数。然而,对于光催化剂开发和评估方面的定性措施关注较少。这些措施将有助于缩小广泛应用的潜在光催化材料的范围。本报告从影响光催化材料评估的一些主要因素出发,提供了批判性的观点,作为良好实践准则。还提供了一个案例研究,将这种定性分析应用于过去十年中最多产的材料之一——无序工程化的黑色二氧化钛(TiO₂)。