Unit of Cardiology, Karolinska Institute and Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Stockholm, Sweden (F.C.).
Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (C.P.C.).
Circulation. 2020 Dec 8;142(23):2205-2215. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050255. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors reduce the risk of hospitalization for heart failure (HHF). We assessed the effect of ertugliflozin on HHF and related outcomes.
VERTIS CV (Evaluation of Ertugliflozin Efficacy and Safety Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial), a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, randomly assigned patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and atherosclerotic cardiovascular (CV) disease to once-daily ertugliflozin 5 mg, 15 mg, or placebo. Prespecified secondary analyses compared ertugliflozin (pooled doses) versus placebo on time to first event of HHF and composite of HHF/CV death, overall and stratified by prespecified characteristics. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used with the Fine and Gray method to account for competing mortality risk, and Andersen-Gill modeling to analyze total (first+recurrent) HHF and total HHF/CV death events.
A total of 8246 patients were randomly assigned to ertugliflozin (n=5499) or placebo (n=2747); n=1958 (23.7%) had a history of heart failure (HF) and n=5006 (60.7%) had pretrial ejection fraction (EF) available, including n=959 with EF ≤45%. Ertugliflozin did not significantly reduce first HHF/CV death (hazard ratio [HR], 0.88 [95% CI, 0.75-1.03]). Overall, ertugliflozin reduced risk for first HHF (HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.54-0.90]; =0.006). Previous HF did not modify this effect (HF: HR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.44-0.90]; no HF: HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.54-1.15]; interaction=0.40). In patients with HF, the risk reduction for first HHF was similar for those with reduced EF ≤45% versus preserved EF >45% or unknown. However, in the overall population, the risk reduction tended to be greater for those with EF ≤45% (HR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.30-0.76]) versus EF >45% (HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.58-1.29]). Effect on risk for first HHF was consistent across most subgroups, but greater benefit of ertugliflozin was observed in 3 populations: baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL·min·1.73 m, albuminuria, and diuretic use (each interaction <0.05). Ertugliflozin reduced total events of HHF (rate ratio, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.56-0.87]) and total HHF/CV death (rate ratio, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.72-0.96]).
In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, ertugliflozin reduced the risk for first and total HHF and total HHF/CV death, adding further support for the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in primary and secondary prevention of HHF. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01986881.
在 2 型糖尿病患者中,钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂可降低心力衰竭(HHF)住院风险。我们评估了依格列净对 HHF 和相关结局的影响。
VERTIS CV(依格列净疗效和安全性心血管结局试验评估)是一项双盲、安慰剂对照试验,将伴有动脉粥样硬化性心血管(CV)疾病的 2 型糖尿病患者随机分为每日一次依格列净 5mg、15mg 或安慰剂组。预先设定的次要分析比较了依格列净(合并剂量)与安慰剂在首次 HHF 事件和 HHF/CV 死亡复合终点的时间,以及按预先设定的特征分层的结果。使用 Fine 和 Gray 方法的 Cox 比例风险模型来考虑竞争死亡风险,使用 Andersen-Gill 模型来分析总(首次+复发)HHF 和总 HHF/CV 死亡事件。
共 8246 例患者被随机分配至依格列净(n=5499)或安慰剂(n=2747)组;n=1958(23.7%)有心力衰竭(HF)病史,n=5006(60.7%)有术前射血分数(EF)可用,包括 n=959 例 EF≤45%。依格列净并未显著降低首次 HHF/CV 死亡(风险比[HR],0.88[95%CI,0.75-1.03])。总体而言,依格列净降低了首次 HHF 的风险(HR,0.70[95%CI,0.54-0.90];P=0.006)。既往 HF 并未改变这一效果(HF:HR,0.63[95%CI,0.44-0.90];无 HF:HR,0.79[95%CI,0.54-1.15];交互作用 P=0.40)。在 HF 患者中,EF≤45%的患者与 EF 保留>45%或未知的患者首次 HHF 风险降低相似。然而,在总体人群中,EF≤45%的患者风险降低幅度大于 EF>45%的患者(HR,0.48[95%CI,0.30-0.76])。首次 HHF 风险降低的效果在大多数亚组中是一致的,但在 3 个亚组中观察到依格列净的获益更大:基线估计肾小球滤过率<60mL·min·1.73m2、白蛋白尿和利尿剂使用(各交互作用 P<0.05)。依格列净降低了 HHF 的总事件发生率(率比,0.70[95%CI,0.56-0.87])和总 HHF/CV 死亡(率比,0.83[95%CI,0.72-0.96])。
在 2 型糖尿病患者中,依格列净降低了首次和总 HHF 以及总 HHF/CV 死亡的风险,进一步支持了钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂在 HHF 的一级和二级预防中的应用。注册:网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT01986881。