Department of Ophthalmology, Korgialenio Benakio Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Department of Ophthalmology, Hippokration General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Ophthalmic Res. 2021;64(4):675-683. doi: 10.1159/000512103. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the applicability of optical coherence tomography (OCT) angiography (OCTA) for measuring geographic atrophy (GA) areas in age-related macular degeneration (AMD) patients with "foveal" and "no-foveal" sparing disease and compare it to other imaging modalities.
A multimodal imaging protocol was applied, using infrared (IR) imaging, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), OCTA, and en-face OCT in 35 eyes of 23 AMD patients with GA. Patients were classified into 2 groups, with and without foveal sparing disease. GA area measurements for all imaging modalities were compared for each group separately.
The measured GA area was estimated to be 6.68 ± 3.18 mm2 using IR; 6.99 ± 3.09 mm2 using FAF; 6.56 ± 3.11 mm2 using OCTA, and 6.65 ± 3.14 mm2 using en-face OCT. There was no statistically significant difference in the GA area between different modalities (p = 0.977). When separate analysis was conducted for patients with "foveal" and "no-foveal" sparing disease, although GA measurements in FAF imaging displayed higher numerical values than the other modalities, especially in patients with foveal sparing, no statistically significant difference in the GA area was found between the different imaging modalities in either group (p = 0.816 for foveal sparing; p = 0.992 for no-foveal sparing group).
OCTA can be reliably used in the assessment of GA in AMD patients with and without foveal sparing disease. For both groups, measurements are comparable to IR, en-face OCT, and FAF, despite the fact that the latter recorded larger area of GA, mainly in the foveal sparing cases.
本研究旨在评估光学相干断层扫描血管造影(OCTA)在评估年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)患者中具有“中心凹”和“非中心凹”保留疾病的地理萎缩(GA)区域的适用性,并与其他成像方式进行比较。
对 23 名 AMD 伴 GA 患者的 35 只眼进行了多模态成像方案,包括红外(IR)成像、眼底自发荧光(FAF)、OCTA 和共焦 OCT。将患者分为两组,一组为有中心凹保留疾病,另一组为无中心凹保留疾病。分别比较两组患者所有成像方式的 GA 面积测量值。
IR 测量的 GA 面积为 6.68 ± 3.18mm2;FAF 为 6.99 ± 3.09mm2;OCTA 为 6.56 ± 3.11mm2;共焦 OCT 为 6.65 ± 3.14mm2。不同成像方式之间的 GA 面积无统计学差异(p = 0.977)。当对具有“中心凹”和“非中心凹”保留疾病的患者进行单独分析时,尽管 FAF 成像中的 GA 测量值比其他方式的数值更高,特别是在具有中心凹保留的患者中,但在两组患者中,不同成像方式之间的 GA 面积均无统计学差异(中心凹保留组 p = 0.816;非中心凹保留组 p = 0.992)。
OCTA 可可靠地用于评估 AMD 患者中具有和不具有中心凹保留疾病的 GA。对于这两组患者,其测量值与 IR、共焦 OCT 和 FAF 相当,尽管 FAF 记录的 GA 面积较大,主要是在中心凹保留的情况下。