Sclafani A
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1987 Summer;11(2):155-62. doi: 10.1016/s0149-7634(87)80020-9.
Adult female rats were fed, in addition to chow and water, a carbohydrate source that differed in type (glucose, sucrose, or polysaccharide), form (32% solution, powder, or gel), or taste (very sweet, minimally sweet, or bitter). A control group was fed only chow and water during the 40-day experiment. The groups fed the glucose solution, sucrose solution, or one of three polysaccharide solutions (Polycose, maltose-dextrin 10, maltose-dextrin 42) all overrate and gained more body weight and fat than did the control group. The carbohydrate solution groups did not differ in their total caloric intake, weight gain, percent body fat, or basal insulin level. The polysaccharide groups, however, consumed more carbohydrate than did the sugar groups. The groups fed glucose, sucrose, or Polycose in powder form consumed less carbohydrate and total calories, gained less weight and fat, and had lower insulin levels than did the groups fed the saccharides in solution form. The powder groups did not reliably differ from the control group on these measures. Rats fed Polycose in solution form or in a solid gel form (32% Polycose + 1% agar) were similar in their carbohydrate intake, total caloric intake, weight gain, and percent body fat. Rats fed Polycose solutions that were minimally sweet (32% Polycose), sweet (0.2% saccharin + 32% Polycose), or bitter [0.05% sucrose octa acetate (SOA) + 32% Polycose] did not differ in their Polycose intake, total caloric intake, weight gain, or percent body fat. The results demonstrate that saccharide form is more important than saccharide type or taste in promoting hyperphagia and obesity in rats. The Polycose gel findings further indicate that it is the water of hydration, not liquidity that is responsible for the hyperphagia-inducing effect of carbohydrate solutions.
除了常规食物和水之外,还给成年雌性大鼠喂食了类型(葡萄糖、蔗糖或多糖)、形态(32%的溶液、粉末或凝胶)或味道(非常甜、微甜或苦)不同的碳水化合物来源。在为期40天的实验中,一个对照组只喂食常规食物和水。与对照组相比,喂食葡萄糖溶液、蔗糖溶液或三种多糖溶液(聚葡萄糖、麦芽糖糊精10、麦芽糖糊精42)之一的组均进食过量,体重和脂肪增加更多。碳水化合物溶液组在总热量摄入、体重增加、体脂百分比或基础胰岛素水平方面没有差异。然而,多糖组比糖类组消耗了更多的碳水化合物。与喂食溶液形式糖类的组相比,喂食粉末形式的葡萄糖、蔗糖或聚葡萄糖的组消耗的碳水化合物和总热量更少,体重和脂肪增加更少,胰岛素水平更低。在这些指标上,粉末组与对照组没有可靠的差异。以溶液形式或固体凝胶形式(32%聚葡萄糖+1%琼脂)喂食聚葡萄糖的大鼠在碳水化合物摄入量、总热量摄入、体重增加和体脂百分比方面相似。喂食微甜(32%聚葡萄糖)、甜(0.2%糖精+32%聚葡萄糖)或苦[0.05%蔗糖八乙酸酯(SOA)+32%聚葡萄糖]的聚葡萄糖溶液的大鼠在聚葡萄糖摄入量、总热量摄入、体重增加或体脂百分比方面没有差异。结果表明,在促进大鼠食欲过盛和肥胖方面,糖类的形态比糖类的类型或味道更重要。聚葡萄糖凝胶的研究结果进一步表明,导致碳水化合物溶液产生食欲过盛诱导作用的是水合水,而非流动性。