• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童甲床修复后指甲板应更换还是丢弃?甲床损伤分析(NINJA)随机对照试验:卫生经济学与统计分析计划。

Should the nail plate be replaced or discarded after nail bed repair in children? Nail bed INJury Analysis (NINJA) randomised controlled trial: a health economic and statistical analysis plan.

作者信息

Stokes Jamie R, Png May Ee, Jain Abhilash, Greig Aina V H, Shirkey Beverly A, Dritsaki Melina, Cook Jonathan A

机构信息

Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, Botnar Research Centre, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Windmill Road, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK.

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2020 Oct 7;21(1):833. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04724-1.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-020-04724-1
PMID:33028408
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7542732/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nail bed trauma is one of the most common surgically treated paediatric hand injuries in the UK. Despite surgeons generally expressing a preference to replace the nail plate after repairing the nail bed, there is limited evidence to support this practice. We describe a statistical and health economic analysis plan (SHEAP) for the Nail bed INJury Analysis (NINJA) randomised controlled trial.

METHODS/DESIGN: NINJA is a multicentre, pragmatic, superiority, parallel group randomised controlled trial of the treatment of nail bed injury in participants 16 years old or younger. The study aims to evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of replacing the nail plate compared to discarding it following the repair of a nail bed injury. Surgical site infection at 7-10 days post-randomisation and cosmetic appearance of the nail are the co-primary outcomes for NINJA. Surgical site infection at 7-10 days post-randomisation will be evaluated using a logistic regression model adjusting for site as the sole stratification factor and allowing for intra-site correlation. Cosmetic appearance will be assessed via the newly developed Oxford Finger Nail Appearance Score and will be evaluated by use of a Mann-Whitney U test. An ordinal logistic regression model will also be used to assess the Oxford Finger Nail Appearance Score, adjusting for site and allowing for intra-site correlation. Secondary outcomes are measured at 7-10 days and 4 months and include the EQ-5D-Y questionnaire, pain at first dressing change, cost-effectiveness, late surgical site infection, and participant/parent satisfaction with nail healing. Missing primary outcome data will be summarised by treatment arm and investigated through a sensitivity analysis. Full details of the planned methods of analysis and descriptive statistics are described in this paper. The NINJA study protocol has been published previously.

DISCUSSION

The planned analysis strategy for the NINJA trial has been set out here to reduce the risk of reporting bias and data-driven analysis. Any deviations from the SHEAP described in this paper will be detailed and justified fully in the final report of the trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN, ISRCTN44551796 . Registered on 23 April 2018.

摘要

背景

在英国,甲床创伤是最常见的需手术治疗的儿童手部损伤之一。尽管外科医生普遍倾向于在修复甲床后更换甲板,但支持这种做法的证据有限。我们描述了一项针对甲床损伤分析(NINJA)随机对照试验的统计与卫生经济学分析计划(SHEAP)。

方法/设计:NINJA是一项多中心、务实、优效性、平行组随机对照试验,针对16岁及以下的甲床损伤参与者。该研究旨在评估修复甲床损伤后更换甲板与丢弃甲板相比的疗效和成本效益。随机分组后7 - 10天的手术部位感染和指甲的外观是NINJA的共同主要结局。随机分组后7 - 10天的手术部位感染将使用逻辑回归模型进行评估,以手术部位作为唯一分层因素并考虑部位内相关性。外观将通过新开发的牛津指甲外观评分进行评估,并使用曼-惠特尼U检验进行评价。还将使用有序逻辑回归模型评估牛津指甲外观评分,对手术部位进行调整并考虑部位内相关性。次要结局在7 - 10天和4个月时进行测量,包括EQ - 5D - Y问卷、首次换药时的疼痛、成本效益、晚期手术部位感染以及参与者/家长对指甲愈合的满意度。缺失的主要结局数据将按治疗组进行汇总,并通过敏感性分析进行研究。本文描述了计划的分析方法和描述性统计的详细信息。NINJA研究方案先前已发表。

讨论

此处阐述了NINJA试验的计划分析策略,以降低报告偏倚和数据驱动分析的风险。与本文所述SHEAP的任何偏差将在试验的最终报告中详细说明并充分论证。

试验注册

ISRCTN,ISRCTN44551796。于2018年4月23日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8494/7542732/7eb16473808d/13063_2020_4724_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8494/7542732/7eb16473808d/13063_2020_4724_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8494/7542732/7eb16473808d/13063_2020_4724_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Should the nail plate be replaced or discarded after nail bed repair in children? Nail bed INJury Analysis (NINJA) randomised controlled trial: a health economic and statistical analysis plan.儿童甲床修复后指甲板应更换还是丢弃?甲床损伤分析(NINJA)随机对照试验:卫生经济学与统计分析计划。
Trials. 2020 Oct 7;21(1):833. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04724-1.
2
NINJA trial: should the nail plate be replaced or discarded after nail bed repair in children? Protocol for a multicentre randomised control trial.NINJA 试验:儿童趾甲床修复后是否应更换或丢弃趾甲板?一项多中心随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 4;9(12):e031552. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031552.
3
Nail bed INJury Assessment Pilot (NINJA-P) study: should the nail plate be replaced or discarded after nail bed repair in children? Study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial.甲床损伤评估试点(NINJA-P)研究:儿童甲床修复后甲板应更换还是丢弃?一项试点随机对照试验的研究方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2015 Aug 19;1:29. doi: 10.1186/s40814-015-0025-z. eCollection 2015.
4
Effectiveness of nail bed repair in children with or without replacing the fingernail: NINJA multicentre randomized clinical trial.甲床修复术在儿童中是否替换指甲的有效性:NINJA 多中心随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2023 Mar 30;110(4):432-438. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad031.
5
Randomized feasibility trial of replacing or discarding the nail plate after nail-bed repair in children.儿童甲床修复后更换或丢弃甲板的随机可行性试验
Br J Surg. 2017 Nov;104(12):1634-1639. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10673.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
ACL Surgery Necessity in Non-Acute Patients (ACL SNNAP): a statistical analysis plan for a randomised controlled trial.前交叉韧带(ACL)手术在非急性期患者中的必要性(ACL SNNAP):一项随机对照试验的统计分析计划。
Trials. 2022 May 12;23(1):389. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06309-6.
8
Cost-effectiveness of replacing versus discarding the nail in children with nail bed injury.儿童甲床损伤中保留指甲与拔除指甲的成本效益分析
Br J Surg. 2023 Aug 11;110(9):1104-1107. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad086.
9
Intramedullary nail fixation versus locking plate fixation for adults with a fracture of the distal tibia: the UK FixDT RCT.交锁髓内钉固定与锁定钢板固定治疗成人胫骨远端骨折:英国 FixDT RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 May;22(25):1-148. doi: 10.3310/hta22250.
10
Retrograde intramedullary nail fixation compared with fixed-angle plate fixation for fracture of the distal femur: the TrAFFix feasibility RCT.逆行髓内钉固定与角度固定钢板治疗股骨远端骨折的比较:TRAFFIX 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Sep;23(51):1-132. doi: 10.3310/hta23510.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of replacing versus discarding the nail in children with nail bed injury.儿童甲床损伤中保留指甲与拔除指甲的成本效益分析
Br J Surg. 2023 Aug 11;110(9):1104-1107. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad086.
2
Effectiveness of nail bed repair in children with or without replacing the fingernail: NINJA multicentre randomized clinical trial.甲床修复术在儿童中是否替换指甲的有效性:NINJA 多中心随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2023 Mar 30;110(4):432-438. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad031.

本文引用的文献

1
NINJA trial: should the nail plate be replaced or discarded after nail bed repair in children? Protocol for a multicentre randomised control trial.NINJA 试验:儿童趾甲床修复后是否应更换或丢弃趾甲板?一项多中心随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 4;9(12):e031552. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031552.
2
EQ-5D-Y as a Health-Related Quality of Life Instrument for Children and Adolescents: The Instrument's Characteristics, Development, Current Use, and Challenges of Developing Its Value Set.EQ-5D-Y 作为儿童和青少年健康相关生活质量的工具:工具的特点、发展、当前应用以及制定其价值体系的挑战。
Value Health. 2019 Jan;22(1):31-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.11.001.
3
A mean score method for sensitivity analysis to departures from the missing at random assumption in randomised trials.
一种用于随机试验中对偏离随机缺失假设进行敏感性分析的平均得分方法。
Stat Sin. 2018 Oct;28(4):1985-2003. doi: 10.5705/ss.202016.0308.
4
Guidelines for the Content of Statistical Analysis Plans in Clinical Trials.临床试验中统计分析计划内容的指南。
JAMA. 2017 Dec 19;318(23):2337-2343. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.18556.
5
Randomized feasibility trial of replacing or discarding the nail plate after nail-bed repair in children.儿童甲床修复后更换或丢弃甲板的随机可行性试验
Br J Surg. 2017 Nov;104(12):1634-1639. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10673.
6
Surgical treatment of paediatric nail bed injuries in the United Kingdom: Surgeon and patient priorities for future research.英国儿童甲床损伤的外科治疗:外科医生和患者对未来研究的优先事项
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016 Feb;69(2):286-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2015.10.025. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
7
A Review of the Development and Application of Generic Multi-Attribute Utility Instruments for Paediatric Populations.儿科通用多属性效用工具的开发与应用综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2015 Oct;33(10):1013-28. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0286-7.
8
Controversies in the treatment of nail bed injuries.
J Hand Surg Am. 2013 Jul;38(7):1427-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.04.009. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
9
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force.健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS)——解释与说明:国际卫生经济学会健康经济评估报告指南良好报告实践工作组报告。
Value Health. 2013 Mar-Apr;16(2):231-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.002.
10
Pediatric nailbed repair study: nail replacement increases morbidity.小儿甲床修复研究:甲片置换会增加发病率。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Feb;129(2):394e-396e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31823af1bb.