Arjun Sharma Jamie, Gadjradj Pravesh S, Peul Wilco C, van Tulder Maurits W, Moojen Wouter A, Harhangi Biswadjiet S
Neurosurgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Neurosurgery, University Neurosurgical Center Holland, Leiden University Medical Center and The Hague Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands, Leiden, The Netherlands.
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 6;10(10):e036818. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036818.
Intermittent neurogenic claudication (INC) is often caused by lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Laminectomy is considered a frequently used surgical technique for LSS. Previous studies have shown that laminectomy can potentially cause lumbar instability. Less invasive techniques, preserving midline structures including the bilateral small size interarcuair decompression, are currently applied. Due to lack of evidence and consensus, surgeons have to rely on their training and own experiences to choose the best surgical techniques for their patients. Hence, an observer and patient blinded multicentre, randomised controlled trial was designed to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bilateral interarcuair decompression versus laminectomy for LSS.
174 patients above 40 years with at least 12 weeks of INC will be recruited. Patients are eligible for inclusion if they have a clinical indication for surgery for INC with an MRI showing signs of LSS. Patients will be randomised to laminectomy or bilateral interarcuair decompression. The primary outcome is functional status measured with the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire at 12 months. Secondary outcomes consist of pain intensity, self-perceived recovery, functional status measured with the Oswestry Disability Index and a physical examination. Outcome measurement moments will be scheduled at 3 and 6 weeks, and at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36 and 48 months after surgery. Physical examination will be performed at 6 weeks, and 12, 24 and 48 months. An economic evaluation will be performed and questionnaires will be used to collect cost data.
The Medical Ethical Committee of the Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam approved this study (NL.65826.078.18). The results will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal.
ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03480893).
MEC-2018-093.
间歇性神经源性跛行(INC)通常由腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)引起。椎板切除术被认为是治疗LSS常用的手术技术。既往研究表明,椎板切除术可能导致腰椎不稳。目前应用了侵入性较小的技术,保留包括双侧小尺寸椎间孔减压在内的中线结构。由于缺乏证据和共识,外科医生不得不依靠他们的培训和自身经验为患者选择最佳手术技术。因此,设计了一项观察者和患者双盲的多中心随机对照试验,以确定双侧椎间孔减压与椎板切除术治疗LSS的有效性和成本效益。
将招募174例年龄在40岁以上、患有至少12周INC的患者。如果患者有因INC进行手术的临床指征且MRI显示有LSS迹象,则符合纳入条件。患者将被随机分为椎板切除术组或双侧椎间孔减压组。主要结局是术后12个月用罗兰 - 莫里斯残疾问卷测量的功能状态。次要结局包括疼痛强度、自我感觉的恢复情况、用奥斯维斯特里残疾指数测量的功能状态以及体格检查。结局测量时间点安排在术后3周和6周,以及术后3、6、12、18、24、36和48个月。体格检查将在术后6周以及12、24和48个月进行。将进行经济评估,并使用问卷收集成本数据。
鹿特丹伊拉斯姆斯医学中心医学伦理委员会批准了本研究(NL.65826.078.18)。研究结果将发表在国际同行评审期刊上。
ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT03480893)。
MEC - 2018 - 093。