Gray Samantha M, McKay Heather A, Nettlefold Lindsay, Race Douglas, Macdonald Heather M, Naylor Patti-Jean, Sims-Gould Joanie
Active Aging Research Team, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Active Aging Research Team, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Br J Sports Med. 2021 Jan;55(2):84-91. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102465. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
To examine older adult physical activity (PA) intervention studies that evaluated implementation and/or scale-up. Research question 1: What implementation and/or scale-up indicators (specific, observable and measurable characteristics that show the progress of implementation) were reported? Research question 2: What implementation and/or scale-up frameworks were reported? Research question 3: Did studies evaluate the relationship between implementation or scale-up of the intervention and individual level health/behaviour outcomes? If yes, how?
Systematic review.
Publications from electronic databases and hand searches (2000 to December 2019).
Any PA intervention studies with community-dwelling older adult participants (mean age ≥60 years). Required indicators: (a) Must report amount of PA as an outcome, with validated self-report or objective measures, and (b) Must have reported at least one implementation or scale-up framework and/or one implementation or scale-up indicator.
137 studies were included for research question 1, 11 for question 2 and 22 for question 3. 137 studies reported an implementation indicator: 14 unique indicators. None were specified as indicators for scale-up evaluation. 11 studies were guided by an implementation or scale-up framework. 22 studies described a relationship between an implementation indicator and an individual-level health outcome.
There is need for implementation research that extends beyond analysis at the individual level, includes clearly defined indicators and provides a guiding framework to support PA initiatives in older adults. Such implementation studies should evaluate factors in the broader context (eg,political, environmental) that influence scale-up.
CRD42018091839.
审查评估实施和/或扩大规模情况的老年人身体活动(PA)干预研究。研究问题1:报告了哪些实施和/或扩大规模指标(显示实施进展的具体、可观察和可测量特征)?研究问题2:报告了哪些实施和/或扩大规模框架?研究问题3:研究是否评估了干预措施的实施或扩大规模与个体层面健康/行为结果之间的关系?如果是,如何评估?
系统评价。
电子数据库和手工检索的出版物(2000年至2019年12月)。
任何针对社区居住的老年参与者(平均年龄≥60岁)的PA干预研究。所需指标:(a)必须将PA量作为结果报告,采用经过验证的自我报告或客观测量方法,且(b)必须报告至少一个实施或扩大规模框架和/或一个实施或扩大规模指标。
137项研究纳入研究问题1,11项纳入问题2,22项纳入问题3。137项研究报告了一项实施指标:14项独特指标。没有一项被指定为扩大规模评估的指标。11项研究由实施或扩大规模框架指导。22项研究描述了实施指标与个体层面健康结果之间的关系。
需要开展超越个体层面分析的实施研究,包括明确界定的指标,并提供一个指导框架以支持老年人的PA倡议。此类实施研究应在更广泛的背景(如政治、环境)下评估影响扩大规模的因素。
PROSPERO注册编号:CRD42018091839。