Suppr超能文献

身体活动对老年人有益——但项目实施是否被忽视了?对报告了实施框架或措施的干预研究的系统评价。

Physical activity is good for older adults-but is programme implementation being overlooked? A systematic review of intervention studies that reported frameworks or measures of implementation.

作者信息

Gray Samantha M, McKay Heather A, Nettlefold Lindsay, Race Douglas, Macdonald Heather M, Naylor Patti-Jean, Sims-Gould Joanie

机构信息

Active Aging Research Team, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Active Aging Research Team, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

出版信息

Br J Sports Med. 2021 Jan;55(2):84-91. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102465. Epub 2020 Oct 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine older adult physical activity (PA) intervention studies that evaluated implementation and/or scale-up. Research question 1: What implementation and/or scale-up indicators (specific, observable and measurable characteristics that show the progress of implementation) were reported? Research question 2: What implementation and/or scale-up frameworks were reported? Research question 3: Did studies evaluate the relationship between implementation or scale-up of the intervention and individual level health/behaviour outcomes? If yes, how?

DESIGN

Systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

Publications from electronic databases and hand searches (2000 to December 2019).

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Any PA intervention studies with community-dwelling older adult participants (mean age ≥60 years). Required indicators: (a) Must report amount of PA as an outcome, with validated self-report or objective measures, and (b) Must have reported at least one implementation or scale-up framework and/or one implementation or scale-up indicator.

RESULTS

137 studies were included for research question 1, 11 for question 2 and 22 for question 3. 137 studies reported an implementation indicator: 14 unique indicators. None were specified as indicators for scale-up evaluation. 11 studies were guided by an implementation or scale-up framework. 22 studies described a relationship between an implementation indicator and an individual-level health outcome.

CONCLUSION

There is need for implementation research that extends beyond analysis at the individual level, includes clearly defined indicators and provides a guiding framework to support PA initiatives in older adults. Such implementation studies should evaluate factors in the broader context (eg,political, environmental) that influence scale-up.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION

CRD42018091839.

摘要

目的

审查评估实施和/或扩大规模情况的老年人身体活动(PA)干预研究。研究问题1:报告了哪些实施和/或扩大规模指标(显示实施进展的具体、可观察和可测量特征)?研究问题2:报告了哪些实施和/或扩大规模框架?研究问题3:研究是否评估了干预措施的实施或扩大规模与个体层面健康/行为结果之间的关系?如果是,如何评估?

设计

系统评价。

数据来源

电子数据库和手工检索的出版物(2000年至2019年12月)。

研究选择的纳入标准

任何针对社区居住的老年参与者(平均年龄≥60岁)的PA干预研究。所需指标:(a)必须将PA量作为结果报告,采用经过验证的自我报告或客观测量方法,且(b)必须报告至少一个实施或扩大规模框架和/或一个实施或扩大规模指标。

结果

137项研究纳入研究问题1,11项纳入问题2,22项纳入问题3。137项研究报告了一项实施指标:14项独特指标。没有一项被指定为扩大规模评估的指标。11项研究由实施或扩大规模框架指导。22项研究描述了实施指标与个体层面健康结果之间的关系。

结论

需要开展超越个体层面分析的实施研究,包括明确界定的指标,并提供一个指导框架以支持老年人的PA倡议。此类实施研究应在更广泛的背景(如政治、环境)下评估影响扩大规模的因素。

PROSPERO注册编号:CRD42018091839。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验