Radiology Department, Huadong Hospital, Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Institute of Functional and Molecular Medical Imaging, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 7;10(1):16690. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73915-2.
We evaluated the feasibility and image quality of prospective electrocardiography (ECG)-triggered coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) using a body surface area (BSA) protocol for contrast-medium (CM) administration on both second- and third-generation scanners (Flash and Force CT), without using heart rate control. One-hundred-and-eighty patients with suspected coronary heart disease undergoing CCTA were divided into groups A (BSA protocol for CM on Flash CT), B (body mass index (BMI)-matched patients; BMI protocol for CM on Flash CT), and C (BMI-matched patients; BSA protocol for CM on Force CT). Patient characteristics, quantitative and qualitative measures, and radiation dose were compared between groups A and B, and A and C. Of the 180 patients, 99 were male (median age, 62 years). Average BSA in groups A, B, and C was 1.80 ± 0.17 m, 1.74 ± 0.16 m, and 1.64 ± 0.17 m, respectively, with groups A and C differing significantly (P < 0.001). Contrast volume (50.50 ± 8.57 mL vs. 45.00 ± 6.18 mL) and injection rate (3.90 ± 0.44 mL/s vs. 3.63 ± 0.22 mL/s) differed significantly between groups A and C (P < 0.001). Groups A and C (both: all CT values > 250 HU, average scores > 4) achieved slightly lower diagnostic image quality than group B. The BSA protocol for CM administration was feasible in both Flash and Force CT, and therefore may be valuable in clinical practice.
我们评估了使用第二代和第三代扫描仪(Flash 和 Force CT)的体表面积(BSA)对比剂(CM)给药方案,不使用心率控制,前瞻性心电图(ECG)触发冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影(CCTA)的可行性和图像质量。180 例疑似冠心病患者行 CCTA 检查,分为 A 组(BSA 方案,Flash CT 上的 CM)、B 组(BMI 匹配患者;Flash CT 上的 BMI 方案 CM)和 C 组(BMI 匹配患者;Force CT 上的 BSA 方案 CM)。比较了 A 组和 B 组、A 组和 C 组的患者特征、定量和定性指标以及辐射剂量。180 例患者中,99 例为男性(中位年龄 62 岁)。A、B 和 C 组的平均 BSA 分别为 1.80±0.17m、1.74±0.16m 和 1.64±0.17m,A 组和 C 组差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。对比剂体积(50.50±8.57mL 比 45.00±6.18mL)和注射速度(3.90±0.44mL/s 比 3.63±0.22mL/s)差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。A 组和 C 组(均为:所有 CT 值>250HU,平均评分>4)的诊断图像质量略低于 B 组。CM 给药的 BSA 方案在 Flash 和 Force CT 中均可行,因此在临床实践中可能具有价值。