Wang Wei, Zhao Yan E, Qi Li, Li Xie, Zhou Chang Sheng, Zhang Long Jiang, Lu Guang Ming
Department of Medical Imaging, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210002, China.
Eur J Radiol. 2017 May;90:97-105. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.02.020. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
To investigate image quality, radiation dose, and diagnostic efficiency of prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch coronary CT angiography (CCTA) at 70 kVp with 30mL contrast agent intra-individually compared with routine CCTA protocol.
One hundred and thirty eight patients with suspected coronary artery disease, body mass index (BMI)≤25kg/m and heart rate (HR)≤70 beats per minute (bpm) underwent prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch CCTA at 70 kVp and 30mL contrast agent (protocol A) and prospectively ECG-triggered sequential scanning at 120 kVp and 60mL contrast medium (protocol B). Objective and subjective image quality, radiation doses, and diagnostic accuracy were evaluated and compared between the two protocols.
Higher CT attenuation, higher noise, lower signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and lower contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were found in protocol A than in protocol B (P<0.001). However, image quality of protocol A were diagnostic. In patients with BMI<23kg/m or HR<60bpm, subjective image quality scores of some coronary arteries in protocol A were not significantly different from protocol B (P>0.05). Effective dose in protocol A has reduced by 96.7% compared with protocol B (P<0.001). No significant differences were found for diagnostic accuracy between the two protocols on a per-segment (P=0.513), per-vessel (P=0.317) and per-patient (P=0.125) basis.
Prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch CCTA at 70kVp with 30mL contrast agent can reduce radiation dose but maintain image quality and high diagnostic accuracy in a selected, non-obese population.
将前瞻性心电图触发的70 kVp、30mL对比剂个体化冠状动脉CT血管造影(CCTA)与常规CCTA方案进行比较,研究其图像质量、辐射剂量及诊断效率。
138例疑似冠心病患者,体重指数(BMI)≤25kg/m²且心率(HR)≤70次/分钟(bpm),接受了70 kVp、30mL对比剂的前瞻性心电图触发高螺距CCTA(方案A)以及120 kVp、60mL对比剂的前瞻性心电图触发序列扫描(方案B)。对两种方案的客观和主观图像质量、辐射剂量及诊断准确性进行评估和比较。
与方案B相比,方案A的CT衰减更高、噪声更高、信噪比(SNR)更低、对比噪声比(CNR)更低(P<0.001)。然而,方案A的图像质量具有诊断性。在BMI<23kg/m²或HR<60bpm的患者中,方案A中部分冠状动脉的主观图像质量评分与方案B无显著差异(P>0.05)。方案A的有效剂量与方案B相比降低了96.7%(P<0.001)。两种方案在每节段(P=0.513)、每血管(P=0.317)和每位患者(P=0.125)的诊断准确性方面无显著差异。
对于选定的非肥胖人群,70kVp、30mL对比剂的前瞻性心电图触发高螺距CCTA可降低辐射剂量,同时保持图像质量和高诊断准确性。