Department of Genetic Medicine and Services, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
Department of Pathology and Clinical Laboratories, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
Pathol Int. 2020 Dec;70(12):932-942. doi: 10.1111/pin.13029. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
In the nationwide cancer genome screening project SCRUM-Japan GI-SCREEN, 2590 archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissues from 19 institutions were analyzed with two tissue-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels at the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-certified College of American Pathologists (CAP)-accredited central laboratory. The Oncomine Cancer Research Panel (OCP; 143 genes) succeeded in producing validated results for only 68.3% of the samples (%OCP-success). CE-IVD (25 genes) succeeded in 45.9% of the OCP-failed samples, leading to an overall NGS success (%combined-success) rate as high as 82.9%. Among 2573 samples, the DNA-integrity (ΔC )-high (ΔC < 4.4, n = 1253) samples showed significantly higher %OCP- and %combined-success rates (90.2% and 97.4%, respectively) than the DNA-integrity-intermediate (4.4 < ΔC < 6.3, n = 911; 68.9% and 88.7%) and DNA-integrity-low ones (ΔC > 6.3 or polymerase chain reaction-failed, n = 409; 5.6% and 24.7%). Other factors associated with NGS success included the FFPE-sample storage period (<4 years), the specimen type (surgical) and the primary tumor site (colorectal). Multivariable analysis revealed DNA integrity as the factor with the strongest independent association with NGS success, although it was suggested that other institution-specific factors contribute to the discordance of inter-institutional NGS success rates. Our results emphasize the importance of DNA quality in FFPE samples for NGS tests and the impact of DNA integrity on quality monitoring of pathology specimens for achieving successful NGS.
在全国癌症基因组筛查项目 SCRUM-Japan GI-SCREEN 中,2590 份来自 19 个机构的存档福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(FFPE)肿瘤组织,在经临床实验室改进修正案(CLIA)认证的美国病理学家协会(CAP)认证的中心实验室,使用两个基于组织的下一代测序(NGS)面板进行了分析。Oncomine Cancer Research Panel(OCP;143 个基因)仅成功产生了 68.3%(%OCP-成功)样本的验证结果。CE-IVD(25 个基因)在 OCP 失败的样本中成功了 45.9%,导致 NGS 总体成功率(%联合成功)高达 82.9%。在 2573 个样本中,DNA 完整性(ΔC)高(ΔC <4.4,n=1253)样本的%OCP 和%联合成功率(分别为 90.2%和 97.4%)明显高于 DNA 完整性中等(4.4 <ΔC <6.3,n=911;68.9%和 88.7%)和 DNA 完整性低的样本(ΔC >6.3 或聚合酶链反应失败,n=409;5.6%和 24.7%)。与 NGS 成功相关的其他因素包括 FFPE 样本储存期(<4 年)、标本类型(手术)和原发肿瘤部位(结直肠)。多变量分析显示,DNA 完整性是与 NGS 成功最密切相关的独立因素,尽管提示其他机构特定因素可能导致机构间 NGS 成功率的差异。我们的结果强调了 DNA 质量在 FFPE 样本中对 NGS 检测的重要性,以及 DNA 完整性对实现成功 NGS 的病理标本质量监测的影响。