Cepich M S, Olivetti L, Sardo P, Floriani M, Bonardelli S, Giulini S M, Moretti R
Radiol Med. 1987 Jul-Aug;74(1-2):45-8.
Examination of 88 extracranial carotid arteries using CW Doppler spectrum analysis is compared with the findings of transfemoral conventional arteriography. There is no significant difference (P greater than 0.05) between CWD and angiographic results, although sensitivity, specificity and accuracy are superior for the latter technique. CWD spectrum analysis can underestimate complete occlusion and misinterpret the degree of stenosis, however it is a cheap and rapid procedure that can be used to judge whether particular symptoms are due to identifiable disease and whether selective carotid arteriography is advisable.
运用连续波多普勒频谱分析对88条颅外颈动脉进行检查,并与经股动脉常规血管造影的结果进行比较。连续波多普勒(CWD)与血管造影结果之间无显著差异(P大于0.05),尽管后一种技术的敏感性、特异性和准确性更高。CWD频谱分析可能会低估完全闭塞情况并错误解读狭窄程度,然而它是一种廉价且快速的检查方法,可用于判断特定症状是否由可识别的疾病引起,以及是否建议进行选择性颈动脉血管造影。