Suppr超能文献

[多普勒超声、静脉数字减影血管造影术与传统X线血管造影术在诊断颈动脉分叉处狭窄性病变中的比较]

[Comparison of Doppler ultrasound, intravenous DSA and conventional film angiography in diagnosing stenosing changes in the area of the carotid bifurcation].

作者信息

Gmelin E, Borgis C J, Kummer D, Tänzer B, Weiss H D

出版信息

Rofo. 1985 Jan;142(1):52-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1052599.

Abstract

The findings on Doppler ultrasound, intravenous DSA and conventional film angiography were compared in 66 examinations of the carotids with regard to their specificity, sensitivity and accuracy. Comparisons with the literature show that intravenous DSA equals Doppler ultrasound only if good or excellent results of the latter are considered. If poorer DSA results are included, diagnostic precision of this method is 5 to 10% less than that of Doppler ultrasound. Mural ulceration can be diagnosed by means of intravenous DSA in only about 50% of cases, whereas Doppler ultrasound is unable to diagnose this. Improved image quality of intravenous DSA, with better diagnostic precision, could be achieved by using ECG gating.

摘要

对66例颈动脉检查的多普勒超声、静脉数字减影血管造影(DSA)和传统X线血管造影的结果进行了特异性、敏感性和准确性方面的比较。与文献比较表明,只有当认为多普勒超声结果良好或优秀时,静脉DSA才与多普勒超声相当。如果纳入较差的DSA结果,该方法的诊断精度比多普勒超声低5%至10%。静脉DSA仅能在约50%的病例中诊断壁层溃疡,而多普勒超声无法诊断这一点。通过使用心电图门控可提高静脉DSA的图像质量,并提高诊断精度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验