Gmelin E, Borgis C J, Kummer D, Tänzer B, Weiss H D
Rofo. 1985 Jan;142(1):52-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1052599.
The findings on Doppler ultrasound, intravenous DSA and conventional film angiography were compared in 66 examinations of the carotids with regard to their specificity, sensitivity and accuracy. Comparisons with the literature show that intravenous DSA equals Doppler ultrasound only if good or excellent results of the latter are considered. If poorer DSA results are included, diagnostic precision of this method is 5 to 10% less than that of Doppler ultrasound. Mural ulceration can be diagnosed by means of intravenous DSA in only about 50% of cases, whereas Doppler ultrasound is unable to diagnose this. Improved image quality of intravenous DSA, with better diagnostic precision, could be achieved by using ECG gating.
对66例颈动脉检查的多普勒超声、静脉数字减影血管造影(DSA)和传统X线血管造影的结果进行了特异性、敏感性和准确性方面的比较。与文献比较表明,只有当认为多普勒超声结果良好或优秀时,静脉DSA才与多普勒超声相当。如果纳入较差的DSA结果,该方法的诊断精度比多普勒超声低5%至10%。静脉DSA仅能在约50%的病例中诊断壁层溃疡,而多普勒超声无法诊断这一点。通过使用心电图门控可提高静脉DSA的图像质量,并提高诊断精度。