Lancet. 2020 Oct 24;396(10259):1345-1352. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32013-4. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
Lopinavir-ritonavir has been proposed as a treatment for COVID-19 on the basis of in vitro activity, preclinical studies, and observational studies. Here, we report the results of a randomised trial to assess whether lopinavir-ritonavir improves outcomes in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19.
In this randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial, a range of possible treatments was compared with usual care in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19. The trial is underway at 176 hospitals in the UK. Eligible and consenting patients were randomly allocated to either usual standard of care alone or usual standard of care plus lopinavir-ritonavir (400 mg and 100 mg, respectively) by mouth for 10 days or until discharge (or one of the other RECOVERY treatment groups: hydroxychloroquine, dexamethasone, or azithromycin) using web-based simple (unstratified) randomisation with allocation concealment. Randomisation to usual care was twice that of any of the active treatment groups (eg, 2:1 in favour of usual care if the patient was eligible for only one active group, 2:1:1 if the patient was eligible for two active groups). The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality. Analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis in all randomly assigned participants. The trial is registered with ISRCTN, 50189673, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04381936.
Between March 19, 2020, and June 29, 2020, 1616 patients were randomly allocated to receive lopinavir-ritonavir and 3424 patients to receive usual care. Overall, 374 (23%) patients allocated to lopinavir-ritonavir and 767 (22%) patients allocated to usual care died within 28 days (rate ratio 1·03, 95% CI 0·91-1·17; p=0·60). Results were consistent across all prespecified subgroups of patients. We observed no significant difference in time until discharge alive from hospital (median 11 days [IQR 5 to >28] in both groups) or the proportion of patients discharged from hospital alive within 28 days (rate ratio 0·98, 95% CI 0·91-1·05; p=0·53). Among patients not on invasive mechanical ventilation at baseline, there was no significant difference in the proportion who met the composite endpoint of invasive mechanical ventilation or death (risk ratio 1·09, 95% CI 0·99-1·20; p=0·092).
In patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19, lopinavir-ritonavir was not associated with reductions in 28-day mortality, duration of hospital stay, or risk of progressing to invasive mechanical ventilation or death. These findings do not support the use of lopinavir-ritonavir for treatment of patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19.
Medical Research Council and National Institute for Health Research.
洛匹那韦利托那韦基于体外活性、临床前研究和观察性研究,被提议用于治疗 COVID-19。在此,我们报告了一项随机试验的结果,该试验旨在评估洛匹那韦利托那韦是否能改善因 COVID-19 入院的患者的结局。
在这项随机、对照、开放性、平台试验中,在因 COVID-19 入院的患者中,将一系列可能的治疗方法与常规护理进行了比较。该试验正在英国的 176 家医院进行。符合条件并同意的患者被随机分配至接受常规标准护理或常规标准护理加洛匹那韦利托那韦(分别为 400 mg 和 100 mg,口服,连用 10 天,直至出院[或 RECOVERY 治疗组的其他药物之一:羟氯喹、地塞米松或阿奇霉素]),使用基于网络的简单(未分层)随机分组和分配隐藏。常规护理的随机分配是任何一种活性治疗组的两倍(例如,如果患者只符合一种活性组的条件,则为 2:1 有利于常规护理,如果患者符合两种活性组的条件,则为 2:1:1)。主要结局为 28 天全因死亡率。对所有随机分配的参与者进行意向治疗分析。该试验在 ISRCTN 注册,编号为 50189673,在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT04381936。
在 2020 年 3 月 19 日至 2020 年 6 月 29 日之间,1616 名患者被随机分配接受洛匹那韦利托那韦治疗,3424 名患者接受常规护理。总体而言,接受洛匹那韦利托那韦治疗的 374 名(23%)患者和接受常规护理的 767 名(22%)患者在 28 天内死亡(风险比 1.03,95%CI 0.91-1.17;p=0.60)。结果在所有预先规定的患者亚组中一致。我们没有观察到从住院到出院的时间(两组均为中位数 11 天[IQR 5 至>28])或 28 天内出院的存活患者比例(风险比 0.98,95%CI 0.91-1.05;p=0.53)有显著差异。在基线时未接受有创机械通气的患者中,接受有创机械通气或死亡的复合终点的患者比例无显著差异(风险比 1.09,95%CI 0.99-1.20;p=0.092)。
在因 COVID-19 入院的患者中,洛匹那韦利托那韦与降低 28 天死亡率、住院时间或进展为有创机械通气或死亡的风险无关。这些发现不支持使用洛匹那韦利托那韦治疗因 COVID-19 入院的患者。
医学研究理事会和英国国家卫生研究院。