Forest Ecology Research Group (ECOFOR), Escuela Técnica Superior Ingenieros Agrónomos y Montes, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Campus Universitario, 02071, Albacete, Spain.
Centro de Investigación Forestal-Lourizán, Consellería do Medio Rural, Xunta de Galicia, P.O. Box 127, 36080, Pontevedra, Spain.
J Environ Manage. 2021 Jan 1;277:111405. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111405. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
Knowledge of forest soil ecology is necessary to assess vulnerability to disturbances, such as wildfires, and improve its microbial diversity and functional value. Soil microbiota play an important role in forest soil processes and are a key driver of postfire recovery, but they are very vulnerable to heat. According to future scenarios for climate and land-use change, fire regimes will undergo transformations in semiarid terrestrial ecosystems, mainly in the Mediterranean Basin. To develop tools for forest management in fire-prone areas, i.e., fire prevention, we assessed the impact of prescribed burnings on soil microorganisms in Mediterranean mixed pine forests. We hypothesised that low severity fire burns would not influence the functional diversity of soil microorganisms, although the burning season could influence that response due to seasonal variations in its vulnerability. We used the Biolog EcoPlate System to record soil biological indicators and assess the effect of the prescribed burning season (early or late season) on bacterial communities, including the soil-plant interphase. The soil microbiome response differed significantly according to vegetation coverage but prescribed burning season was not directly related. Burning increased the proportions of soil organic matter and soil organic carbon, and also promoted cation-exchange capacity and total phosphorus, which were higher following spring burns. Microbial richness and the Shannon-Weaver diversity index both showed a positive correlation with vegetation cover. However, microbial richness was triggered after burning uncovered patches of vegetation. We also noted differences in the usage pattern for the six substrate groups defined in our study: the use of carboxylic acids, amino acids and carbohydrates was higher in unburned plots and those subject to late burns, whereas amino acids did not predominate in early burn plots.
森林土壤生态学知识对于评估野火等干扰的脆弱性以及提高其微生物多样性和功能价值至关重要。土壤微生物群落在森林土壤过程中发挥着重要作用,是火灾后恢复的关键驱动因素,但它们对热量非常敏感。根据气候和土地利用变化的未来情景,半干旱陆地生态系统中的火灾发生频率将发生转变,主要发生在地中海盆地。为了在易发生火灾的地区开发森林管理工具,例如防火,我们评估了计划火烧对地中海混合松林土壤微生物的影响。我们假设低严重度火灾不会影响土壤微生物的功能多样性,尽管燃烧季节可能会由于其脆弱性的季节性变化而影响这种反应。我们使用 Biolog EcoPlate 系统记录土壤生物指标,并评估计划燃烧季节(早期或晚期)对细菌群落的影响,包括土壤-植物界面。土壤微生物组的反应根据植被覆盖度有显著差异,但与计划燃烧季节没有直接关系。燃烧增加了土壤有机质和土壤有机碳的比例,还促进了阳离子交换能力和总磷,春季燃烧后的这些指标更高。微生物丰富度和香农-威弗多样性指数均与植被覆盖呈正相关。然而,微生物丰富度是在燃烧暴露植被斑块后触发的。我们还注意到在我们研究中定义的六个底物组的使用模式存在差异:在未燃烧的地块和晚期燃烧的地块中,羧酸、氨基酸和碳水化合物的使用较高,而在早期燃烧的地块中,氨基酸并未占主导地位。