Bystad Martin, Storø Benedicte, Gundersen Nina, Wiik Ida Larsen, Nordvang Lene, Grønli Ole, Rasmussen Ingrid Daae, Aslaksen Per M
Department of Psychology, Research Group for Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Norway.
Department of Geropsychiatry, University Hospital of North Norway, Norway.
Heliyon. 2020 Oct 3;6(10):e05132. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05132. eCollection 2020 Oct.
The aim of this study was to investigate whether transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) could improve verbal memory functions in healthy old and younger participants. We hypothesized that active tDCS led to significantly improved memory function, compared to placebo tDCS. Forty healthy participants (20 old and 20 younger participants) were included in the study. We applied a novel stimulation protocol, where six sessions of anodal tDCS were administrated during two consecutive days. Each tDCS session lasted 30 min. The current intensity was 2mA and the stimulation area was the left temporal lobe at T3 in the 10-20 EEG system. Immediate recall, delayed recall and recognition memory were assessed with California Verbal Learning Test II (CVLT-II) and executive functions were assessed with the Trail Making Test (TMT) before the first tDCS session and after the last tDCS session. Half of the participants received placebo tDCS, whereas the other half received active tDCS. We did not reveal any significant differences between active and placebo tDCS in memory functions. However, there was a significant difference between active and placebo tDCS in executive function measured by the Trail Making Test (TMT). This experimental study failed to reveal significant differences between active and placebo accelerated tDCS for verbal memory functions. However, accelerated tDCS was found to be well-tolerated in this study.
本研究的目的是调查经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是否能改善健康老年人和年轻人的言语记忆功能。我们假设,与安慰剂tDCS相比,主动tDCS能显著改善记忆功能。40名健康参与者(20名老年人和20名年轻人)被纳入本研究。我们采用了一种新颖的刺激方案,即在连续两天内进行六次阳极tDCS治疗。每次tDCS治疗持续30分钟。电流强度为2mA,刺激区域为10-20脑电图系统中T3处的左侧颞叶。在第一次tDCS治疗前和最后一次tDCS治疗后,使用加利福尼亚言语学习测试II(CVLT-II)评估即时回忆、延迟回忆和识别记忆,并使用连线测验(TMT)评估执行功能。一半参与者接受安慰剂tDCS,另一半接受主动tDCS。我们未发现主动tDCS和安慰剂tDCS在记忆功能上有任何显著差异。然而,通过连线测验(TMT)测量的主动tDCS和安慰剂tDCS在执行功能上存在显著差异。这项实验研究未能揭示主动tDCS和安慰剂加速tDCS在言语记忆功能上的显著差异。然而,在本研究中发现加速tDCS耐受性良好。