Suppr超能文献

期望可能会影响经颅直流电刺激的效果。

Expectations may influence the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Ahmanson-Lovelace Brain Mapping Center, University of California, Los Angeles, USA; Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.

出版信息

Neuropsychologia. 2018 Oct;119:524-534. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Sep 15.

Abstract

Growing interest surrounds transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as a safe and inexpensive method for improving cognitive functions and mood. Nevertheless, tDCS studies rarely examine psychological factors such as expectations of outcomes, which may influence tDCS responsiveness through placebo-like effects. Here we sought to evaluate the potential influence of expectations on tDCS intervention outcomes. We assessed expectations of tDCS outcomes in 88 healthy young adults on three occasions: i) at baseline; ii) after reading information implying either high or low effectiveness of stimulation; and iii) after a single-session of sham-controlled anodal tDCS applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, during working memory (WM) training. Participants were largely uncertain about the effectiveness of stimulation in improving cognitive function at baseline. High or low expectation priming using simple positive or cautionary messages significantly increased or decreased expectation ratings, respectively, but ratings significantly decreased following stimulation in all groups. We found greater improvement in participants who received high compared to low expectation priming. Participants who received active stimulation and low expectation priming exhibited the lowest performance, suggesting that expectation priming and stimulation may have interacted. We did not find a significant effect of baseline expectations, belief of group assignment, or individual characteristics on measures of WM and verbal fluency. However, controlling for baseline expectations revealed greater post-intervention improvement on the executive function measures in participants who received high (compared to low) expectation priming. People randomly assigned to receive high expectation priming reported having a more pleasant experience overall, including greater satisfaction. Our findings suggest that expectations of outcomes should be taken into account in tDCS-based experimental studies and clinical trials.

摘要

经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)作为一种安全且廉价的改善认知功能和情绪的方法,引起了越来越多的关注。然而,tDCS 研究很少检查心理因素,如对结果的期望,这些因素可能通过安慰剂样效应影响 tDCS 的反应性。在这里,我们试图评估期望对 tDCS 干预结果的潜在影响。我们在三个时间点评估了 88 名健康年轻成年人对 tDCS 结果的期望:i)基线时;ii)阅读暗示刺激有效性高或低的信息后;iii)在单次假刺激控制的阳极 tDCS 应用于左背外侧前额叶皮质后,在工作记忆(WM)训练期间。参与者在基线时对刺激改善认知功能的有效性大多不确定。使用简单的积极或警告信息进行高或低的期望启动分别显著增加或降低了期望评分,但在所有组中,评分在刺激后均显著降低。我们发现,接受高期望启动的参与者比接受低期望启动的参与者有更大的改善。接受主动刺激和低期望启动的参与者表现出最低的表现,这表明期望启动和刺激可能相互作用。我们没有发现基线期望、对分组的信念或个体特征对 WM 和言语流畅性测量有显著影响。然而,控制基线期望后,在接受高(与低)期望启动的参与者中,执行功能测量的干预后改善更大。随机分配接受高期望启动的参与者报告总体上有更愉快的体验,包括更高的满意度。我们的发现表明,在基于 tDCS 的实验研究和临床试验中,应该考虑对结果的期望。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验