Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University, College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, 03722, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Computational Science and Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
Eur Radiol. 2021 Apr;31(4):2405-2413. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07365-9. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
To develop a radiomics score using ultrasound images to predict thyroid malignancy and to investigate its potential as a complementary tool to improve the performance of risk stratification systems.
We retrospectively included consecutive patients who underwent fine-needle aspiration (FNA) for thyroid nodules that were cytopathologically diagnosed as benign or malignant. Nodules were randomly assigned to a training and test set (8:2 ratio). A radiomics score was developed from the training set, and cutoff values based on the maximum Youden index (Rad_maxY) and for 5%, 10%, and 20% predicted malignancy risk (Rad_5%, Rad_10%, Rad_20%, respectively) were applied to the test set. The performances of the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines were compared with the combined performances of the guidelines and radiomics score with interpretations from expert and nonexpert readers.
A total of 1624 thyroid nodules from 1609 patients (mean age, 50.1 years [range, 18-90 years]) were included. The radiomics score yielded an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.87) in the training set and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.81) in the test set (Rad_maxY). When the radiomics score was combined with the ACR or ATA guidelines (Rad_5%), all readers showed increased specificity, accuracy, and PPV and decreased unnecessary FNA rates (all p < .05), with no difference in sensitivity (p > .05).
Radiomics help predict thyroid malignancy and improve specificity, accuracy, PPV, and unnecessary FNA rate while maintaining the sensitivity of the ACR and ATA guidelines for both expert and nonexpert readers.
• The radiomics score yielded an AUC of 0.85 and 0.75 in the training and test set, respectively. • For all readers, combining a 5% predicted malignancy risk cutoff for the radiomics score with the ACR and ATA guidelines significantly increased specificity, accuracy, and PPV and decreased unnecessary FNA rates, with no decrease in sensitivity. • Radiomics can help predict malignancy in thyroid nodules in combination with risk stratification systems, by improving specificity, accuracy, and PPV and unnecessary FNA rates while maintaining sensitivity for both expert and nonexpert readers.
利用超声图像开发一种放射组学评分,以预测甲状腺恶性肿瘤,并探讨其作为改善风险分层系统性能的辅助工具的潜力。
我们回顾性纳入了因甲状腺结节接受细针穿刺抽吸(FNA)且细胞学诊断为良性或恶性的连续患者。将结节随机分配到训练集和测试集(8:2 比例)。从训练集中开发放射组学评分,并应用最大 Youden 指数(Rad_maxY)和 5%、10%和 20%预测恶性风险的截断值(Rad_5%、Rad_10%、Rad_20%)对测试集进行评估。比较了美国放射学院(ACR)和美国甲状腺协会(ATA)指南的表现,以及指南和放射组学评分与专家和非专家读者的解释相结合的综合表现。
共纳入了 1609 名患者的 1624 个甲状腺结节(平均年龄 50.1 岁[范围 18-90 岁])。在训练集中,放射组学评分的 AUC 为 0.85(95%CI:0.83,0.87),在测试集中为 0.75(95%CI:0.69,0.81)(Rad_maxY)。当放射组学评分与 ACR 或 ATA 指南(Rad_5%)结合时,所有读者的特异性、准确性、PPV 均增加,不必要的 FNA 率降低(均<.05),而敏感性无差异(>.05)。
放射组学有助于预测甲状腺恶性肿瘤,并提高特异性、准确性、PPV 和不必要的 FNA 率,同时保持 ACR 和 ATA 指南对专家和非专家读者的敏感性。
放射组学评分在训练集和测试集中的 AUC 分别为 0.85 和 0.75。
对于所有读者,将放射组学评分的 5%预测恶性风险截断值与 ACR 和 ATA 指南相结合,可显著提高特异性、准确性、PPV 和不必要的 FNA 率,同时保持敏感性,无论是专家还是非专家读者。
放射组学可与风险分层系统相结合,帮助预测甲状腺结节的恶性程度,提高特异性、准确性和 PPV,并降低不必要的 FNA 率,同时保持专家和非专家读者的敏感性。