• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

焦虑症认知行为疗法中治疗关系的要素:一项系统综述。

Elements of the therapeutic relationship in CBT for anxiety disorders: A systematic review.

作者信息

Luong Hoang K, Drummond Sean P A, Norton Peter J

机构信息

School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.

The Cairnmillar Institute, Hawthorn East, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

J Anxiety Disord. 2020 Dec;76:102322. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102322. Epub 2020 Oct 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102322
PMID:33035773
Abstract

To optimise the effects of cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for anxiety disorders, research has increasingly focussed on understanding mechanisms of change. Specifically, the therapeutic relationship has been identified as a potential "active ingredient" of therapy. The evidence for the effects of eleven elements of the therapeutic relationship (alliance, collaboration, goal consensus, group cohesion, empathy, positive regard, feedback, emotional expression, outcome expectations, treatment credibility, alliance rupture-repair) on treatment outcomes in CBT for anxiety disorders was systematically reviewed. Fifty unique studies were included, and findings were qualitatively reviewed and summarised. Results revealed consistent and sizeable evidence for the cohesion-outcome and expectation-outcome relationships. There was emerging evidence for the effects of collaboration, empathy, and alliance rupture-repair on outcomes. However, the evidence for goal consensus and credibility on outcomes was limited. Notably, review of the alliance literature revealed substantial inconsistencies across studies. No studies were identified for positive regard, feedback, and emotional expression. Overall, further research is needed to clarify the role of the therapeutic relationship in CBT for anxiety disorders. These findings will contribute to the conceptual integration of therapeutic relationship constructs in cognitive behavioural models, and help to improve treatments and outcomes for individuals.

摘要

为优化认知行为疗法(CBT)对焦虑症的治疗效果,研究越来越关注对改变机制的理解。具体而言,治疗关系已被确定为治疗的一种潜在“活性成分”。对治疗关系的11个要素(联盟、协作、目标共识、团体凝聚力、同理心、积极关注、反馈、情感表达、结果期望、治疗可信度、联盟破裂-修复)对焦虑症CBT治疗结果的影响进行了系统综述。纳入了50项独特的研究,并对研究结果进行了定性综述和总结。结果显示,凝聚力-结果关系和期望-结果关系有一致且显著的证据。关于协作、同理心和联盟破裂-修复对结果的影响,有新出现的证据。然而,关于目标共识和可信度对结果的证据有限。值得注意的是,对联盟文献的综述显示,各研究之间存在大量不一致之处。未发现关于积极关注、反馈和情感表达的研究。总体而言,需要进一步研究以阐明治疗关系在焦虑症CBT中的作用。这些发现将有助于认知行为模型中治疗关系结构的概念整合,并有助于改善个体的治疗和治疗结果。

相似文献

1
Elements of the therapeutic relationship in CBT for anxiety disorders: A systematic review.焦虑症认知行为疗法中治疗关系的要素:一项系统综述。
J Anxiety Disord. 2020 Dec;76:102322. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102322. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
2
Which, who and when? Therapeutic processes in group cognitive behaviour therapy for anxiety disorders.哪些人、何时以及如何?探讨团体认知行为疗法治疗焦虑障碍的治疗过程。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2022 Sep;29(5):1742-1754. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2740. Epub 2022 Apr 10.
3
Can you see what I see? A comparison of client and observer perspectives of the alliance and group cohesion in CBT.你能看到我所看到的吗?认知行为疗法中来访者与观察者对联盟及团体凝聚力看法的比较
Cogn Behav Ther. 2022 Mar;51(2):100-113. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2021.1898463. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
4
The relationships among working alliance, group cohesion and homework engagement in group cognitive behaviour therapy for social anxiety disorder.团体认知行为治疗社交焦虑障碍中工作联盟、团体凝聚力和家庭作业参与之间的关系。
Psychother Res. 2024 Jan;34(1):54-67. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2022.2161966. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
5
Dynamic relationships of therapist alliance and group cohesion in transdiagnostic group CBT for anxiety disorders.焦虑症跨诊断团体认知行为疗法中治疗师联盟与团体凝聚力的动态关系
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016 Feb;84(2):146-55. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000062. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
6
Long-term outcome of cognitive behaviour therapy clinical trials in central Scotland.苏格兰中部认知行为疗法临床试验的长期结果。
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Nov;9(42):1-174. doi: 10.3310/hta9420.
7
Anxiety sensitivity as a predictor, and non-specific therapeutic factors as predictors and mediators of CBT outcome for obsessive-compulsive disorder in a naturalistic mental health setting.在自然主义心理健康环境中,焦虑敏感性作为预测因素,以及非特异性治疗因素作为强迫症认知行为疗法结果的预测因素和中介因素。
J Affect Disord. 2023 Mar 1;324:92-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.12.085. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
8
Motivation and treatment credibility predict alliance in cognitive behavioral treatment for youth with anxiety disorders in community clinics.动机和治疗可信度可预测社区诊所中青少年焦虑障碍认知行为治疗中的联盟。
J Clin Psychol. 2018 Jun;74(6):793-805. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22551. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
9
Specific and common processes as mediators of the long-term effects of cognitive-behavioral therapy integrated with motivational interviewing for generalized anxiety disorder.特定和共同过程作为认知行为疗法与动机性访谈结合治疗广泛性焦虑障碍的长期效果的中介。
Psychother Res. 2019 Feb;29(2):213-225. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2017.1332794. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
10
The alliance mediates outcome in cognitive-behavioral therapy for social anxiety disorder, but not in attention bias modification.该联盟在认知行为疗法治疗社交焦虑障碍中起中介作用,但在注意偏向矫正中不起作用。
Psychother Res. 2021 Jun;31(5):589-603. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2020.1836423. Epub 2020 Oct 28.

引用本文的文献

1
A randomized controlled trial of self-help cognitive behavioural therapy for depression in adults with pulmonary hypertension.一项针对患有肺动脉高压的成年人抑郁症的自助认知行为疗法的随机对照试验。
Br J Health Psychol. 2025 Sep;30(3):e12800. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12800.
2
Treatment expectancy and credibility as predictors of concentrated exposure treatment outcomes in patients with difficult-to-treat obsessive-compulsive disorder.治疗期望和可信度作为难治性强迫症患者集中暴露治疗结果的预测因素
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 25;25(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06737-z.
3
A large-scale evaluation of therapeutic alliance and symptom trajectories of depression and anxiety in blended care therapy.
在混合式护理治疗中对治疗联盟和抑郁与焦虑症状轨迹的大规模评估。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 8;19(11):e0313112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313112. eCollection 2024.
4
Should face-to-face in-person therapy be preserved for some clients with anxiety? Evaluation of Anxiety UK's psychological therapy services before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.对于一些焦虑症患者,是否应保留面对面的个人治疗?英国焦虑症协会心理治疗服务在新冠疫情之前及期间的评估。
BJPsych Open. 2024 Oct 25;10(6):e184. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2024.738.
5
Predictors of Symptom Reduction and Remission Among People with Anxiety: Secondary Analyses from a Randomized Controlled Trial.焦虑人群症状减轻和缓解的预测因素:一项随机对照试验的二次分析。
Psychiatr Q. 2024 Sep;95(3):447-467. doi: 10.1007/s11126-024-10081-y. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
6
Does expectancy affect insomnia treatment response in cancer survivors receiving acupuncture and cognitive behavioral therapy?期待值会影响接受针灸和认知行为疗法的癌症幸存者的失眠治疗反应吗?
J Cancer Surviv. 2023 Jun;17(3):826-835. doi: 10.1007/s11764-022-01272-2. Epub 2022 Dec 3.
7
A thematic analysis of barriers and facilitators to participant engagement in group exposure and response prevention therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder.对团体暴露和反应预防治疗强迫症中参与者参与的障碍和促进因素的主题分析。
Psychol Psychother. 2023 Mar;96(1):129-147. doi: 10.1111/papt.12430. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
8
The therapeutic alliance in cognitive-behavioral therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.强迫症认知行为疗法中的治疗联盟:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 6;13:951925. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.951925. eCollection 2022.
9
The psychological and subjective experience of catatonia: a qualitative study.紧张症的心理和主观体验:一项定性研究。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Jul 15;10(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00885-7.
10
Goal setting with young people for anxiety and depression: What works for whom in therapeutic relationships? A literature review and insight analysis.目标设定与年轻人的焦虑和抑郁:在治疗关系中,对谁有效?文献综述和洞察分析。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Jul 13;10(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00879-5.