• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主动脉瓣狭窄的多普勒超声:压力阶差测定的体外研究

Doppler ultrasound in aortic stenosis: in vitro studies of pressure gradient determination.

作者信息

Holen J, Waag R C, Gramiak R

出版信息

Ultrasound Med Biol. 1987 Jun;13(6):321-8. doi: 10.1016/0301-5629(87)90165-7.

DOI:10.1016/0301-5629(87)90165-7
PMID:3303589
Abstract

Torricelli's equation expresses a simple relationship between fluid velocity and pressure gradient in orifice flow and is currently used in conjunction with noninvasive Doppler ultrasound to determine gradients in mitral stenosis, and aortic stenosis, as well as other cardiovascular orifices. In theory, however, the Torricelli equation overestimates the gradient in aortic stenosis and the Borda equation should be more applicable. A brief tutorial derivation of the Borda and Torricelli equations is presented. The applicability of Torricelli's equation in aortic stenosis was studied experimentally with a rigid wall, pulsatile flow analogue. Doppler ultrasound and manometric data were collected simultaneously. Percent stenosis, peak flow rate and fluid viscosity were varied. The results demonstrated that the Torricelli equation consistently overestimated the pressure gradient. At 61% area stenosis, the overestimation exceeded 100%. In vivo studies are required to determine the relevance of the observations to clinical situations.

摘要

托里拆利方程表达了孔口流中流体速度与压力梯度之间的简单关系,目前它与无创多普勒超声结合使用,以确定二尖瓣狭窄、主动脉瓣狭窄以及其他心血管孔口处的压力梯度。然而,从理论上讲,托里拆利方程高估了主动脉瓣狭窄时的压力梯度,而博尔达方程应该更适用。本文给出了博尔达方程和托里拆利方程的简要推导教程。使用刚性壁、脉动流模拟实验研究了托里拆利方程在主动脉瓣狭窄中的适用性。同时收集了多普勒超声和压力测量数据。改变狭窄百分比、峰值流速和流体粘度。结果表明,托里拆利方程一直高估压力梯度。在面积狭窄61%时,高估超过100%。需要进行体内研究以确定这些观察结果与临床情况的相关性。

相似文献

1
Doppler ultrasound in aortic stenosis: in vitro studies of pressure gradient determination.主动脉瓣狭窄的多普勒超声:压力阶差测定的体外研究
Ultrasound Med Biol. 1987 Jun;13(6):321-8. doi: 10.1016/0301-5629(87)90165-7.
2
Doppler ultrasound in orifice flow. In vitro studies of the relationship between pressure difference and fluid velocity.孔口血流中的多普勒超声。压力差与流体速度关系的体外研究。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 1985 Mar-Apr;11(2):261-6. doi: 10.1016/0301-5629(85)90124-3.
3
Quantification of pressure gradients across stenotic valves by Doppler ultrasound.通过多普勒超声对狭窄瓣膜两端的压力阶差进行定量分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983 Oct;2(4):707-18. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(83)80311-8.
4
Importance of pressure recovery for the assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. Role of aortic size, aortic valve area, and direction of the stenotic jet in vitro.压力恢复在多普勒超声评估主动脉瓣狭窄中的重要性。体外研究主动脉大小、主动脉瓣面积及狭窄射流方向的作用。
Circulation. 1996 Oct 15;94(8):1934-40. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.94.8.1934.
5
Evaluation of aortic stenosis by continuous wave Doppler ultrasound.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984 Jan;3(1):150-6. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(84)80442-8.
6
Value and limitations of Doppler ultrasound in the evaluation of aortic stenosis: a statistical analysis of 70 consecutive patients.多普勒超声在评估主动脉瓣狭窄中的价值与局限性:70例连续患者的统计分析
Am Heart J. 1986 Jul;112(1):150-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(86)90694-0.
7
Pressure recovery in aortic stenosis: an in vitro study in a pulsatile flow model.主动脉瓣狭窄中的压力恢复:在脉动流模型中的体外研究
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Dec;20(7):1585-93. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90454-u.
8
Potential role of Reynolds number in resolving Doppler- and catheter-based transvalvular gradient discrepancies in aortic stenosis.雷诺数在解决主动脉瓣狭窄中基于多普勒和导管的跨瓣压差差异方面的潜在作用。
J Heart Valve Dis. 2011 Mar;20(2):159-64.
9
[Doppler echocardiographic estimates of pressure gradients in various types of stenoses: usefulness and limitations].[不同类型狭窄病变中压力阶差的多普勒超声心动图评估:实用性与局限性]
J Cardiol. 1989 Sep;19(3):851-8.
10
"Overestimation" of catheter gradients by Doppler ultrasound in patients with aortic stenosis: a predictable manifestation of pressure recovery.主动脉瓣狭窄患者中,多普勒超声对导管梯度的“高估”:压力恢复的可预测表现
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 May;33(6):1655-61. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00066-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of blood velocity measurements between ultrasound Doppler and accelerated phase-contrast MR angiography in small arteries with disturbed flow.在血流紊乱的小动脉中,超声多谱勒与加速相位对比磁共振血管造影的血流速度测量比较。
Phys Med Biol. 2011 Mar 21;56(6):1755-73. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/6/015. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
2
Is pressure recovery an important cause of "Doppler aortic stenosis" with no gradient at cardiac catheterisation?压力恢复是心导管检查时无压力阶差的“多普勒主动脉瓣狭窄”的重要原因吗?
Heart. 1996 Nov;76(5):381-3. doi: 10.1136/hrt.76.5.381.