压力恢复是心导管检查时无压力阶差的“多普勒主动脉瓣狭窄”的重要原因吗？ - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Is pressure recovery an important cause of "Doppler aortic stenosis" with no gradient at cardiac catheterisation?

作者信息

Chambers J

出版信息

Heart. 1996 Nov;76(5):381-3. doi: 10.1136/hrt.76.5.381.

DOI:10.1136/hrt.76.5.381

PMID:8944578

原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC484563/

Abstract

摘要

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bb4/484563/92fb5bfeb0e0/heart00027-0009-a.jpg

相似文献

Is pressure recovery an important cause of "Doppler aortic stenosis" with no gradient at cardiac catheterisation?压力恢复是心导管检查时无压力阶差的“多普勒主动脉瓣狭窄”的重要原因吗？

Heart. 1996 Nov;76(5):381-3. doi: 10.1136/hrt.76.5.381.

Comparison of Doppler echocardiographic methods with heart catheterisation in assessing aortic valve area in 100 patients with aortic stenosis.100例主动脉瓣狭窄患者中，多普勒超声心动图方法与心导管检查评估主动脉瓣面积的比较。

Br Heart J. 1995 Mar;73(3):293-8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.73.3.293.

Assessment of severity of aortic stenosis by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography.通过连续波多普勒超声心动图评估主动脉瓣狭窄的严重程度。

Indian Heart J. 1990 Sep-Oct;42(5):371-4.

Evaluation of aortic stenosis severity: role of contrast echocardiography in comparison with conventional echocardiography and cardiac catheterization.主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的评估：对比超声心动图与传统超声心动图及心导管检查相比的作用。

Rev Port Cardiol. 2002 May;21(5):555-72.

[Preoperative evaluation of severe aortic stenosis by Doppler echocardiography and hemodynamics].[通过多普勒超声心动图和血流动力学对重度主动脉瓣狭窄进行术前评估]

Arch Inst Cardiol Mex. 1998 Jan-Feb;68(1):58-63.

Understanding the catheter-Doppler pressure gradient discrepancy in aortic stenosis.理解主动脉瓣狭窄中导管-多普勒压力阶差差异

J Heart Valve Dis. 2011 May;20(3):299-300.

[Noninvasive quantification and classification of the severity of aortic stenosis using Doppler echocardiography].[使用多普勒超声心动图对主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度进行无创定量和分类]

Z Kardiol. 1992 Nov;81(11):619-26.

Overestimation of aortic valve gradient measured by Doppler echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis.主动脉瓣狭窄患者中经多普勒超声心动图测量的主动脉瓣压差的高估。

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005 Jun;65(2):176-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20324.

Correction of Doppler Gradients for Pressure Recovery Improves Agreement with Subsequent Catheterization Gradients in Congenital Aortic Stenosis.校正多普勒梯度以改善压力恢复，可提高先天性主动脉瓣狭窄后续导管梯度的一致性。

J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Dec;28(12):1410-7. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.08.016. Epub 2015 Oct 9.

Reliability of new and old Doppler echocardiographic indexes of the severity of aortic stenosis in patients with a low cardiac output.低心输出量患者中评估主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的新旧多普勒超声心动图指标的可靠性

Ital Heart J. 2002 Apr;3(4):248-55.

引用本文的文献

Prosthesis-patient mismatch in transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement.经导管和外科主动脉瓣置换术中的人工瓣膜-患者不匹配

Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 May 31;13(3):211-223. doi: 10.21037/acs-2023-aae-0166. Epub 2024 Apr 28.

Non-invasive determination of pressure recovery by cardiac MRI and echocardiography in patients with severe aortic stenosis: short and long-term outcome prediction.心脏 MRI 和超声心动图无创测定严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者压力恢复：短期和长期预后预测。

J Int Med Res. 2020 Oct;48(10):300060520954708. doi: 10.1177/0300060520954708.

Differences in Pressure Recovery Between Balloon Expandable and Self-expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valves.球囊扩张式和自膨式经导管主动脉瓣之间压力恢复的差异。

Ann Biomed Eng. 2020 Feb;48(2):860-867. doi: 10.1007/s10439-019-02425-8. Epub 2019 Dec 2.

Discrepancy between catheter and doppler gradients immediately post transcatheter aortic valve replacement in an underexpanded prosthesis.在人工瓣膜未充分扩张的经导管主动脉瓣置换术后即刻，导管梯度与多普勒梯度之间的差异。

Clin Case Rep. 2018 Apr 22;6(6):1117-1120. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.1547. eCollection 2018 Jun.

本文引用的文献

Pressure recovery in bileaflet heart valve prostheses. Localized high velocities and gradients in central and side orifices with implications for Doppler-catheter gradient relation in aortic and mitral position.双叶心脏瓣膜假体中的压力恢复。中心孔和侧孔处的局部高速和梯度及其对主动脉和二尖瓣位置的多普勒-导管梯度关系的影响。

Circulation. 1995 Dec 15;92(12):3464-72. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.92.12.3464.

Br Heart J. 1995 Mar;73(3):293-8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.73.3.293.

Evaluation in vitro of prosthetic heart valves: pulsatile flow through a compliant aorta.人工心脏瓣膜的体外评估：通过顺应性主动脉的脉动流。

Life Support Syst. 1983 Jul-Sep;1(3):173-88.

Factors affecting accuracy of in vitro valvar pressure gradient estimates by Doppler ultrasound.影响多普勒超声体外瓣膜压力阶差估计准确性的因素。

Am J Cardiol. 1984 Oct 1;54(7):893-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(84)80228-3.

Aortic stenosis in adults. Non-invasive estimation of pressure differences by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography.成人主动脉瓣狭窄。通过连续波多普勒超声心动图对压力差进行无创估计。

Br Heart J. 1985 Oct;54(4):396-404. doi: 10.1136/hrt.54.4.396.

A reconsideration of Doppler assessed gradients in suspected aortic stenosis.对疑似主动脉瓣狭窄中多普勒评估梯度的重新审视。

Am Heart J. 1985 Oct;110(4):765-73. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(85)90455-7.

Continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of calcific aortic stenosis: a simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study in 100 adult patients.连续波多普勒超声心动图评估钙化性主动脉瓣狭窄的严重程度：100例成年患者的多普勒与心导管同步相关性研究

Circulation. 1985 Jun;71(6):1162-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.71.6.1162.

Doppler ultrasound in aortic stenosis: in vitro studies of pressure gradient determination.主动脉瓣狭窄的多普勒超声：压力阶差测定的体外研究

Ultrasound Med Biol. 1987 Jun;13(6):321-8. doi: 10.1016/0301-5629(87)90165-7.

Review of hydrodynamic principles for the cardiologist: applications to the study of blood flow and jets by imaging techniques.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988 Nov;12(5):1344-53. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(88)92620-4.

Pressure recovery distal to a stenosis: potential cause of gradient "overestimation" by Doppler echocardiography.狭窄远端的压力恢复：多普勒超声心动图导致梯度“高估”的潜在原因。

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989 Mar 1;13(3):706-15. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(89)90615-3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验