• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

目前用于治疗心原性休克的机械循环支持选择。

Currently Available Options for Mechanical Circulatory Support for the Management of Cardiogenic Shock.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Duke Clinical Research Institute, 200 Morris Street, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Duke Clinical Research Institute, 200 Morris Street, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

出版信息

Cardiol Clin. 2020 Nov;38(4):527-542. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2020.06.006.

DOI:10.1016/j.ccl.2020.06.006
PMID:33036715
Abstract

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a complex condition with a high risk for morbidity and mortality. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices were developed to support patients with CS in cases refractory to treatment with vasoactive medications. Current devices include intra-aortic balloon pumps, intravascular microaxial pumps, percutaneous LVAD, percutaneous RVAD, and VA ECMO. Data from limited observational studies and clinical trials show a clear difference in the level of hemodynamic support offered by each device. However, at this point, there are insufficient clinical trial data to guide MCS selection and, until ongoing clinical trials are completed, use of the right device for the right patient depends largely on clinical judgment.

摘要

心原性休克(CS)是一种复杂的病症,具有很高的发病率和死亡率。机械循环支持(MCS)设备的开发是为了在对血管活性药物治疗有反应的情况下支持 CS 患者。目前的设备包括主动脉内球囊泵、血管内微型轴流泵、经皮左心室辅助装置、经皮右心室辅助装置和 VA ECMO。来自有限的观察性研究和临床试验的数据表明,每种设备提供的血流动力学支持水平存在明显差异。然而,目前还没有足够的临床试验数据来指导 MCS 的选择,并且在正在进行的临床试验完成之前,正确的设备用于正确的患者在很大程度上取决于临床判断。

相似文献

1
Currently Available Options for Mechanical Circulatory Support for the Management of Cardiogenic Shock.目前用于治疗心原性休克的机械循环支持选择。
Cardiol Clin. 2020 Nov;38(4):527-542. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2020.06.006.
2
Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.血管内微型轴流左心室辅助装置与主动脉内球囊泵在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者中的应用与院内死亡率和大出血的关系。
JAMA. 2020 Feb 25;323(8):734-745. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0254.
3
Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者使用机械循环支持装置的情况
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2037748. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37748.
4
The Rise of Endovascular Mechanical Circulatory Support Use for Cardiogenic Shock and High Risk Coronary Intervention: Considerations and Challenges.血管内机械循环支持在心原性休克和高危冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用日益增加:考虑因素和挑战。
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2021 Feb;19(2):151-164. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2021.1863147. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
5
Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克早期机械循环支持的可行性:底特律心源性休克倡议
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb 15;91(3):454-461. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27427. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
6
The evolution of temporary percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices: a review of the options and evidence in cardiogenic shock.临时性经皮机械循环支持装置的进展:心源性休克中各种选择及证据的综述
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2015 Jun;17(6):40. doi: 10.1007/s11886-015-0594-8.
7
Escalation strategies, management, and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction-cardiogenic shock patients receiving percutaneous left ventricular support.接受经皮左心室辅助的急性心肌梗死合并心原性休克患者的升级策略、管理和结局。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Sep;102(3):403-414. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30786. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
8
Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction.经皮机械循环支持与急性心肌梗死后心源性休克中的主动脉内球囊反搏。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jan 24;69(3):278-287. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.022. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
9
Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock.机械循环辅助装置在心源性休克中的应用。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May;10(5). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004337.
10
Mechanical circulatory support for patients with cardiogenic shock.机械循环支持治疗心原性休克患者。
Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2019 Oct;29(7):410-417. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2018.11.014. Epub 2018 Dec 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Supporting the "forgotten" ventricle: The evolution of percutaneous RVADs.支持“被遗忘”的心室:经皮右心室辅助装置的发展历程
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jan 4;9:1008499. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1008499. eCollection 2022.