Suppr超能文献

[非子宫内膜样子宫内膜癌指南评估:一项多中心回顾性研究]

[Non endometroid endometrial cancer guidelines evaluation: A multicentric retrospective study].

作者信息

Scattarelli Antoine, Poteau Albane, Aziz Moutaz, Lae Marick, Courville Philippe, Arnaud Maxime, Marpeau Loic, Resch Benoit

机构信息

Département de chirurgie gynécologique, CHU Rouen, 37, boulevard Gambetta, 76000 Rouen, France.

Département de chirurgie, CLCC Henri Becquerel, Rue d'Amiens, Rouen, France.

出版信息

Bull Cancer. 2020 Dec;107(12):1221-1232. doi: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2020.08.006. Epub 2020 Oct 6.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Non endometrioid endometrial cancer are infrequent and have poor prognosis. The aim of the study was to evaluate non endometrioid endometrial cancer managment by evaluating endometrial cancer guidelines application.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This multicentric retrospective study enrolled non endometrioid endometrial cancer between January 2009 to December 2019. Analyses adapted at last French guidelines applicated corresponding of year management.

RESULTS

Seventy-four non endometrioid endometrial cancer analysed in 10 centers: 34 carcinosarcoma (45,9 %), 29 serous carcinoma (39,2 %), 9 clear cells carcinoma (12,2 %) and 2 undifferentiated carcinoma (2,7 %). For initial management, endometrial cancer guidelines applicated to 45,9 %. First reason of initial guidelines « non-application » was lack of surgical lymph node stadification (57,1 %). For adjuvant management, endometrial cancer guidelines applicated to 38.7 %. First reason of adjuvant guidelines « non-application » was lack lymph node stadification to complete staging when it previously incompletly operated (67,6 %).

DISCUSSION

Non endometrioid endometrial cancer guidelines applicability is difficult. This explicated by high age and comorbidity when surgical lymph node stadification is necessary. Using new staging technic will allow target management and better select lymph node staging indication.

摘要

引言

非子宫内膜样子宫内膜癌并不常见,预后较差。本研究的目的是通过评估子宫内膜癌指南的应用情况来评价非子宫内膜样子宫内膜癌的管理。

材料与方法

这项多中心回顾性研究纳入了2009年1月至2019年12月期间的非子宫内膜样子宫内膜癌患者。分析采用了最后适用的法国指南,对应相应年份的管理。

结果

在10个中心分析了74例非子宫内膜样子宫内膜癌:34例癌肉瘤(45.9%),29例浆液性癌(39.2%),9例透明细胞癌(12.2%)和2例未分化癌(2.7%)。对于初始治疗,子宫内膜癌指南的适用率为45.9%。初始指南“未应用”的首要原因是缺乏手术淋巴结分期(57.1%)。对于辅助治疗,子宫内膜癌指南的适用率为38.7%。辅助指南“未应用”的首要原因是先前手术分期不完全时缺乏淋巴结分期以完成分期(67.6%)。

讨论

非子宫内膜样子宫内膜癌指南的适用性较差。这是由于在需要进行手术淋巴结分期时患者年龄较大且合并症较多。采用新的分期技术将有助于进行针对性管理并更好地选择淋巴结分期指征。

相似文献

1
[Non endometroid endometrial cancer guidelines evaluation: A multicentric retrospective study].
Bull Cancer. 2020 Dec;107(12):1221-1232. doi: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2020.08.006. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
2
Malignant peritoneal cytology and increased mortality risk in stage I non-endometrioid endometrial cancer.
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Oct;159(1):43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.07.010. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
4
Isolated tumor cells identified by sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer: Does adjuvant treatment matter?
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Aug;146(2):240-246. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.05.024. Epub 2017 May 31.
5
Uterine carcinosarcoma and high-risk endometrial carcinomas: a clinicopathological comparison.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 May;25(4):629-36. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000350.
6
Is there a survival advantage in diagnosing endometrial cancer in asymptomatic postmenopausal patients? An Israeli Gynecology Oncology Group study.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Aug;219(2):181.e1-181.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.05.013. Epub 2018 May 21.
10
Staging for endometrial cancer: The controversy around lymphadenectomy - Can this be resolved?
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2015 Aug;29(6):845-57. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.02.007. Epub 2015 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

1
A Novel Predictive Tool for Determining the Risk of Early Death From Stage IV Endometrial Carcinoma: A Large Cohort Study.
Front Oncol. 2020 Dec 14;10:620240. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.620240. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Recommendations for the surgical management of gynecological cancers during the COVID-19 pandemic - FRANCOGYN group for the CNGOF.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020 Jun;49(6):101729. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101729. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
2
Comparative Study of Laparoscopic versus Conventional Open Surgical Staging Procedure for Endometrial Cancer: Our Institutional Experience.
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2020 Jan 23;9(1):29-33. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_82_19. eCollection 2020 Jan-Mar.
4
Sentinel lymph node mapping alone compared to more extensive lymphadenectomy in patients with uterine serous carcinoma.
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Jan;156(1):70-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Nov 16.
5
[Lymph node management in endometrial cancer].
Bull Cancer. 2020 Jun;107(6):686-695. doi: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2019.06.015. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
6
Type II endometrial cancers with minimal, non-invasive residual disease on final pathology: What should we do next?
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2019 May 23;29:20-24. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2019.05.007. eCollection 2019 Aug.
7
Laparoscopic Approach in Surgical Staging of Endometrial Cancer.
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2019 May;41(5):306-311. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1688461. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
8
High risk endometrial cancer: Clues towards a revision of the therapeutic paradigm.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2019 Dec;48(10):863-871. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2019.06.003. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
10
Surgical staging in endometrial cancer.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan;145(1):213-221. doi: 10.1007/s00432-018-2792-4. Epub 2018 Nov 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验