Suppr超能文献

肋骨切除的胸廓美容塑形。

Aesthetic Contouring of the Chest wall with Rib Resection.

机构信息

Plastic Surgery Division, Unifesp, Rua Botucatu, 740 - 2nd Floor, P.O. Box: 04039-002, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Plastic Surgery Technical Chamber, Brazilian Federal Council of Medicine (CFM), Brasilia, Brazil.

出版信息

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021 Jun;45(3):1099-1104. doi: 10.1007/s00266-020-01988-5. Epub 2020 Oct 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In past decades, several invasive and noninvasive aesthetic procedures have been sought as a way to improve body contouring, and one may resort to uncertified and potentially dangerous procedures to achieve that goal. An example of this practice would be the resection of ribs to reduce the waist for aesthetic reasons. The objective was to check scientific evidence on the effectiveness and safety of removal of floating ribs for aesthetic purposes.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was carried out in EMBASE/Elsevier, Cochrane, Scopus, Medline, PubMed, BVS, SciELO, OneFile, and Lilacs, throughout the period until June 2020, using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

RESULTS

Fifty-six articles were found in all databases. After applying the inclusion criteria, by reading the title and abstract of the studies found, only two articles were definitively included. One addressed the possibility of removing the 7th and 8th ribs for improving body contouring in patients with an exaggerated anterior projection of the chest wall, without showing cases or surgical techniques. The other demonstrated procedures of body contouring in transgender by the removal of the 11th and 12th ribs in five of the 22 patients studied, just providing a brief description of the surgical technique used, without details.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the relevance of the theme and its popularity, there is not enough scientific evidence to support the practice, effectiveness and safety of the resection of ribs for aesthetic purposes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

摘要

背景

在过去的几十年中,人们寻求了几种侵入性和非侵入性的美容程序,以改善身体轮廓,并且为了达到这一目的,人们可能会诉诸未经认证且潜在危险的程序。这种做法的一个例子是为了美观而切除肋骨以减小腰围。目的是检查去除浮肋以达到美容效果的有效性和安全性的科学证据。

方法

对 EMBASE/Elsevier、Cochrane、Scopus、Medline、PubMed、BVS、SciELO、OneFile 和 Lilacs 中的文献进行了系统的综述,检索时间截至 2020 年 6 月,使用了系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目的指南。

结果

在所有数据库中都找到了 56 篇文章。在应用纳入标准后,通过阅读已发现研究的标题和摘要,仅最终纳入了两篇文章。一篇文章探讨了为改善胸部前突过度的患者的身体轮廓而去除第 7 和第 8 肋骨的可能性,而未显示病例或手术技术。另一篇文章展示了在 22 名研究患者中,通过去除第 11 和第 12 肋骨来进行跨性别者的身体轮廓手术,仅简要描述了所使用的手术技术,而没有详细信息。

结论

尽管该主题很重要且很受欢迎,但仍没有足够的科学证据支持为美容目的切除肋骨的做法、有效性和安全性。

证据水平 III:本杂志要求作者为每篇文章指定一个证据水平。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参考目录或在线作者指南 www.springer.com/00266

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验