Leal Daniel G, Rodrigues Maria Amelia, Tedesco Ana Carolina B, Nahas Fabio Xerfan, Ferreira Lydia Masako, Roxo Ana C W, de Castro Claudio Cardoso, Aboudib Jose Horacio
Ann Plast Surg. 2018 Jan;80(1):71-75. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001179.
The practice of evidence-based medicine in plastic surgery is no longer a trend but a reality, with a growing number of studies published in recent years using evidence-based medicine as an assessment tool.
The aim of this study was to verify whether the number of citations to articles with a high level of evidence is greater than articles with low level of evidence.
A search was conducted in the 4 main international journals of plastic surgery. All original articles published in 2011 were analyzed, selected, and classified based on the study design. The articles were then divided into 2 groups: group 1, high level of evidence; and group 2, low level of evidence. Next, Scopus was searched for the number of citations of each article in the 2 subsequent years. The proportion of the number of citations received by articles in groups 1 and 2 was statistically compared.
The articles with the highest level of evidence were the most cited among original articles, with 48.6% of them being cited more than 10 times over 2 years, whereas only 18.4% of articles in group 2 were cited with the same frequency. The mean number of citations was 12.6 citations per article in group 1 and 6.56 citations in group 2, with a significant difference between groups (P < 0.0001).
The articles with a higher level of evidence are, on average, cited more often than those with low levels of evidence in the leading journals of plastic surgery.
整形外科中循证医学的实践已不再是一种趋势,而是现实,近年来发表的使用循证医学作为评估工具的研究越来越多。
本研究的目的是验证高证据水平文章的被引次数是否多于低证据水平文章。
在4种主要的国际整形外科学术期刊上进行检索。对2011年发表的所有原创文章进行分析、筛选,并根据研究设计进行分类。然后将文章分为两组:第1组,高证据水平;第2组,低证据水平。接下来,在Scopus中搜索每篇文章在随后两年的被引次数。对第1组和第2组文章的被引次数比例进行统计学比较。
证据水平最高的文章在原创文章中被引次数最多,其中48.6%的文章在两年内被引超过10次,而第2组中只有18.4%的文章被引频率相同。第1组文章的平均被引次数为每篇12.6次,第2组为6.56次,两组之间存在显著差异(P < 0.0001)。
在整形外科的主要期刊中,平均而言,高证据水平的文章比低证据水平的文章被引次数更多。