Spine Care Center, Wakayama Medical University Kihoku Hospital, 219 Myoji, Katsuragi Town, Ito, Wakayama, Japan.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Eur Spine J. 2021 Apr;30(4):1011-1017. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06618-x. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
The clinical significance of Modic changes in low back pain (LBP) is yet to be clarified. Thus, this study aimed to examine the association between Modic changes and LBP after adjustment for confounding factors.
We evaluated participants in the second Wakayama Spine Study. The degree of endplate changes as measured using magnetic resonance imaging was classified based on the Modic classification system. The prevalence of the types of Modic change in the lumbar region and at each level was assessed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the association between the types of Modic changes and LBP with adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, disc degeneration score, and disc displacement score. The LBP intensity was also compared according to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score among the three types of Modic change.
Overall, 814 subjects were evaluated. Type II Modic changes were the most prevalent (41.9%). Only type I Modic changes were significantly associated with LBP (odds ratio): 1.84, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-2.9). The LBP VAS score was significantly higher in subjects with type I Modic change than that in those with no Modic change (23.9 ± 26.3 vs. 9.9 ± 19.4, p < 0.05).
Type I Modic changes in the lumbar region are significantly associated with LBP. Profiling Modic changes may be helpful to improve targeted treatment of LBP.
腰痛(LBP)患者的 Modic 改变的临床意义尚不清楚。因此,本研究旨在调整混杂因素后,研究 Modic 改变与 LBP 之间的关系。
我们评估了第二次和歌山脊柱研究的参与者。使用磁共振成像(MRI)测量的终板变化程度根据 Modic 分类系统进行分类。评估腰椎区域和每个水平的 Modic 改变类型的患病率。进行多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定 Modic 改变类型与 LBP 之间的关联,同时调整年龄、性别、体重指数、椎间盘退变评分和椎间盘移位评分。还根据三种 Modic 改变类型的视觉模拟评分(VAS)比较了 LBP 强度。
总体而言,评估了 814 名受试者。II 型 Modic 改变最为常见(41.9%)。只有 I 型 Modic 改变与 LBP 显著相关(优势比):1.84,95%置信区间[CI]:1.1-2.9)。与无 Modic 改变的受试者相比,I 型 Modic 改变的受试者的 LBP VAS 评分明显更高(23.9±26.3 比 9.9±19.4,p<0.05)。
腰椎区域的 I 型 Modic 改变与 LBP 显著相关。分析 Modic 改变可能有助于改善 LBP 的靶向治疗。