• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人间隔减瘤术治疗晚期上皮性卵巢癌:当前的挑战还是未来的方向?系统评价。

Robotic interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: current challenge or future direction? A systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Metaxa Cancer Hospital, Mpotasi 51, 18537, Piraeus, Greece.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2021 Apr;15(2):155-163. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01155-7. Epub 2020 Oct 9.

DOI:10.1007/s11701-020-01155-7
PMID:33037532
Abstract

We evaluated the effectiveness, safety and efficacy of robotic interval debulking surgery (IDS) in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). We conducted a systematic review of the published relevant studies. Α total of 102 patients were evaluated. Mean operative time ranged from 164 to 312 min (mean ± SD: 246 ± 61 min) while mean estimated blood loss ranged from 106.9 to 262.5 ml (mean ± SD: 168 ± 68 ml) and postoperative blood transfusion rate was 19% (n = 19/98). Complete cytoreduction rate (R0 resection) was achieved in 75 patients (76.5%), whereas residual disease ≤ 1 cm in 21 women (21.5%). Mean hospital stay was 2.4 days. No intraoperative and six postoperative (14.6%) complications were reported. Laparotomy conversion rate was 9.2% (9/98) mostly in the terms of achieving complete cytoreduction and 30-day mortality rate was 9.2% (n = 9/98). The median overall survival varied from 39.7 to 47.2 months, while the progression-free survival ranged from 20.6 to 21.2 months during a median follow-up period from 2 to 86 months (median 25.3 months). A total of 60 women (61%) developed disease recurrence. One of the studies reported significantly improved OS and PFS in patients who underwent robotic IDS when compared to those who had laparotomy either during or before the addition of robotic surgery in the management of advanced ovarian cancer disease (47.2 vs 37.8 vs 37.9, p = 0.004 for OS and 20.6 vs 13.9 vs 11.9, p = 0.005 for PFS, respectively). The same was also observed when controlling the parameters of age and stage for patients in the robotic arm (p = 0.02). Robotic interval debulking surgery can be considered in the management of advanced ovarian cancer patients after receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Larger meta-analyses including multicenter randomized control trials are necessary to specify the exact profile of the patients that could benefit from this treatment strategy.

摘要

我们评估了机器人间隔减瘤手术(IDS)在接受新辅助化疗(NACT)治疗的晚期上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)患者中的有效性、安全性和疗效。我们对已发表的相关研究进行了系统评价。共评估了 102 名患者。手术时间平均为 164 至 312 分钟(平均±标准差:246±61 分钟),估计失血量平均为 106.9 至 262.5 毫升(平均±标准差:168±68 毫升),术后输血率为 19%(n=19/98)。75 名患者(76.5%)达到完全肿瘤减灭术(R0 切除),21 名患者(21.5%)残留肿瘤≤1 厘米。平均住院时间为 2.4 天。无术中并发症,术后(14.6%)有 6 例并发症。剖腹术转化率为 9.2%(9/98),主要是为了实现完全肿瘤减灭术,30 天死亡率为 9.2%(n=9/98)。中位总生存期从 39.7 至 47.2 个月不等,中位随访时间从 2 至 86 个月(中位 25.3 个月)期间,无进展生存期从 20.6 至 21.2 个月不等。共有 60 名女性(61%)发生疾病复发。一项研究报告称,与接受剖腹术的患者相比,接受机器人 IDS 的患者的总生存期和无进展生存期显著改善,无论是在添加机器人手术期间还是在此之前,都可用于治疗晚期卵巢癌疾病(OS 为 47.2 比 37.8 比 37.9,p=0.004;PFS 为 20.6 比 13.9 比 11.9,p=0.005)。当控制机器人组患者的年龄和分期参数时,也观察到了同样的结果(p=0.02)。机器人间隔减瘤术可考虑用于接受新辅助化疗的晚期卵巢癌患者的治疗。需要更大的荟萃分析,包括多中心随机对照试验,以确定哪些患者可能从这种治疗策略中受益。

相似文献

1
Robotic interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: current challenge or future direction? A systematic review.机器人间隔减瘤术治疗晚期上皮性卵巢癌:当前的挑战还是未来的方向?系统评价。
J Robot Surg. 2021 Apr;15(2):155-163. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01155-7. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
2
Incorporating robotic surgery into the management of ovarian cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.将机器人手术纳入新辅助化疗后卵巢癌的治疗管理中。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Nov;29(9):1341-1347. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000413. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
3
Comparing Laparotomy with Robot-assisted Interval Debulking Surgery for Patients with Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.比较接受新辅助化疗的晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者的剖腹手术与机器人辅助间隔减瘤术。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Jun;28(6):1237-1243. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.11.015. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
4
When Less Is More: Minimally Invasive Surgery Compared with Laparotomy for Interval Debulking After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Women with Advanced Ovarian Cancer.当少即是多时:新辅助化疗后晚期卵巢癌间隔减瘤术的微创与剖腹手术比较。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 Jul-Aug;26(5):902-909. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.09.765. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
5
Survival outcomes after delayed cytoreduction surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.新辅助化疗后延迟细胞减灭术治疗晚期上皮性卵巢癌的生存结局。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Dec;30(12):1935-1942. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001658. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
6
Assessing feasibility and perioperative outcomes with minimally invasive surgery compared with laparotomy for interval debulking surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.评估微创与剖腹手术相比在晚期上皮性卵巢癌间歇性肿瘤细胞减灭术联合腹腔热灌注化疗中的可行性和围手术期结局。
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Jan;160(1):45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.09.052. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
7
[Analysis of factors related to the prognostic benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery in patients with advanced ovarian cancer].[晚期卵巢癌患者新辅助化疗后行间隔减瘤手术的预后获益相关因素分析]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Jun 25;56(6):385-392. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20201207-00871.
8
Minimal residual disease at primary debulking surgery versus complete tumor resection at interval debulking surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: A survival analysis.在晚期上皮性卵巢癌中,初次肿瘤细胞减灭术时的微小残留病灶与间隔性肿瘤细胞减灭术时的完全肿瘤切除相比:一项生存分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Apr;157(1):209-213. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.01.010. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
9
Primary debulking surgery versus primary neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high grade advanced stage ovarian cancer: comparison of survivals.高级别晚期卵巢癌的初次肿瘤细胞减灭术与初次新辅助化疗:生存比较。
Radiol Oncol. 2018 Sep 11;52(3):307-319. doi: 10.2478/raon-2018-0030.
10
Primary surgery or interval debulking for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: does it matter?晚期上皮性卵巢癌的初次手术或间隔减瘤术:有关系吗?
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014 Oct;24(8):1420-8. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000241.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Treatment of Ovarian Cancer in Young Patients.微创手术对年轻卵巢癌患者治疗的影响
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 23;17(13):2098. doi: 10.3390/cancers17132098.
2
All Wales Ovarian Cancer Prehabilitation Project (AWOCPP).全威尔士卵巢癌术前康复项目(AWOCPP)。
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Feb 25;14(Suppl 1):e002770. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002770.
3
Northern Ireland ovarian cancer prehabilitation project.北爱尔兰卵巢癌术前康复项目。

本文引用的文献

1
The da Vinci Xi: a review of its capabilities, versatility, and potential role in robotic colorectal surgery.达芬奇Xi系统:对其在机器人结直肠手术中的功能、通用性及潜在作用的综述
Robot Surg. 2017 Jul 28;4:77-85. doi: 10.2147/RSRR.S119317. eCollection 2017.
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Feb 25;14(Suppl 1):e002851. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002851.