Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Dec;30(12):1935-1942. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001658. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
Interval cytoreduction following neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a well-recognized treatment alternative to primary debulking surgery in the treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer where patient and/or disease factors prevent complete macroscopic disease resection to be achieved. More recently, the strain of the global COVID-19 pandemic on hospital resources has forced many units to alter the timing of interval surgery and extend the number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles. In order to support this paradigm shift and provide more accurate counseling during these unprecedented times, we investigated the survival outcomes in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer patients with the intent of maximal cytoreduction following neoadjuvant chemotherapy with respect to timing of surgery and degree of cytoreduction.
A retrospective review of all patients aged 18 years and above with FIGO (2014) stage III/IV epithelial ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the intention of interval cytoreduction surgery between January 2008 and December 2017 was conducted. Overall and progression-free survival outcomes were analyzed and compared with patients who only received chemotherapy. Outcome measures were correlated with the number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles and amount of residual disease following surgery.
Six hundred and seventy-one patients (median age 67 (range 20-91) years) were included in the study with 572 patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery and 99 patients with chemotherapy only. There was no difference in the proportion of patients in whom complete cytoreduction was achieved based on number of cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (2-4 cycles: 67.7%, n=337/498); ≥5 cycles: 62.2%, n=46/74). Patients undergoing cytoreduction surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy had a median 5-year progression-free and overall survival of 24 and 38 months, respectively. No significant difference in overall survival between surgical groups was observed (interval cytoreduction: 41 months vs delayed cytoreduction: 43 months, p=0.52). Those who achieved complete cytoreduction to R0 (no macroscopic disease) had a significant median overall survival advantage compared with those with any macroscopic residual disease (R0: 49-51 months vs R<1: 22-39 months, p<0.001 vs R≥1: 23-26 months, p<0.001).
Survival outcomes do not appear to be worse for patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy if cytoreduction surgery is delayed beyond three cycles. In advanced epithelial ovarian cancer patients the imperative to achieve complete surgical cytoreduction remains gold standard, irrespective of surgical timing, for best survival benefit.
新辅助化疗后间隔减瘤术是治疗晚期上皮性卵巢癌的一种公认的治疗选择,对于因患者和/或疾病因素而无法实现完全肉眼疾病切除的患者,可以采用这种方法。最近,全球 COVID-19 大流行对医院资源造成了压力,迫使许多单位改变了间隔手术的时间,并延长了新辅助化疗的周期数。为了支持这一模式转变,并在这些前所未有的时期提供更准确的咨询,我们研究了接受新辅助化疗后有最大减瘤意愿的晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者的生存结局,以了解手术时机和减瘤程度对生存的影响。
对 2008 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月期间接受新辅助化疗和间隔减瘤手术的年龄在 18 岁及以上的 FIGO(2014)分期为 III/IV 期上皮性卵巢癌患者进行了回顾性研究。分析并比较了接受新辅助化疗和手术的患者与仅接受化疗的患者的总生存率和无进展生存率。预后指标与新辅助化疗周期数和术后残留疾病量相关。
671 例患者(中位年龄 67 岁[范围 20-91 岁])纳入研究,其中 572 例患者接受了新辅助化疗和手术治疗,99 例患者仅接受化疗。根据新辅助化疗周期数,达到完全减瘤的患者比例没有差异(2-4 个周期:67.7%,n=337/498;≥5 个周期:62.2%,n=46/74)。接受新辅助化疗后行减瘤手术的患者中位 5 年无进展生存率和总生存率分别为 24 个月和 38 个月。手术组之间的总生存率无显著差异(间隔减瘤组:41 个月 vs 延迟减瘤组:43 个月,p=0.52)。与有任何肉眼残留疾病的患者相比,达到 R0(无肉眼疾病)完全减瘤的患者中位总生存率有显著优势(R0:49-51 个月 vs R<1:22-39 个月,p<0.001 vs R≥1:23-26 个月,p<0.001)。
如果间隔手术延迟超过 3 个周期,接受新辅助化疗的患者的生存结果似乎不会更差。对于晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者,实现完全手术减瘤仍然是最佳生存获益的金标准,无论手术时机如何。