Heinonen Karin, Saisto Terhi, Gissler Mika, Kaijomaa Marja, Sarvilinna Nanna
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Central Finland Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Mar;100(3):538-547. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14022. Epub 2020 Oct 25.
Shoulder dystocia has remained an unpredictable and feared emergency in obstetrics. Some risk factors have been identified but nevertheless there is a lack of risk evaluation tools in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of shoulder dystocia in the Finnish population and to develop a shoulder dystocia risk score tool.
This retrospective, population-based study included all deliveries in Finland between 2004 and 2017 (n = 800 484). The annual numbers of shoulder dystocia diagnoses were gathered from nationwide Finnish Medical Birth Register and Hospital Discharge Register. The incidence of shoulder dystocia was calculated in subgroups according to the mode of delivery, maternal diabetes status, body mass index (BMI), age, parity and gestational age. Based on these numbers, a shoulder dystocia risk score tool was created.
The overall incidence of shoulder dystocia was 0.18%. It increased significantly during the study period from 0.10% to 0.32% (P < .001). More specifically, the incidence increased significantly in all analyzed subgroups except for women with BMI <18.5 or age <20 years. To evaluate the importance of risk factors, practical and simple shoulder dystocia risk score tool was created. Instrumental vaginal delivery, maternal diabetes of any kind, BMI ≥25, age ≥40 years and gestational age ≥41 weeks were associated with higher shoulder dystocia risk compared with non-diabetic, non-obese and younger women with spontaneous deliveries before 41 weeks of gestation. In our risk score tool, cases with shoulder dystocia had a significantly higher number of risk points than those without it (15.2 vs 10.4, P < .001). The risk was significantly high when the scores were ≥18 points (relative risk 9.54, 95% confidence interval 8.61-10.57).
The incidence of shoulder dystocia in Finland increased during the study period but it is still low compared with previous studies from other countries. In clinical daily practice, the new shoulder dystocia risk score tool helps to evaluate the individual risk profile of the parturient. According to this risk score tool, the highest risk was found with the combination of instrumental vaginal delivery, maternal diabetes, BMI ≥25, age ≥40 years and gestational age ≥41 weeks.
肩难产在产科中一直是一种难以预测且令人恐惧的紧急情况。虽然已经确定了一些风险因素,但临床实践中仍缺乏风险评估工具。本研究的目的是评估芬兰人群中肩难产的发生率和风险因素,并开发一种肩难产风险评分工具。
这项基于人群的回顾性研究纳入了2004年至2017年芬兰所有的分娩病例(n = 800484)。每年肩难产诊断的数量从芬兰全国医疗出生登记册和医院出院登记册中收集。根据分娩方式、母亲糖尿病状况、体重指数(BMI)、年龄、产次和孕周,计算肩难产在各亚组中的发生率。基于这些数据,创建了一种肩难产风险评分工具。
肩难产的总体发生率为0.18%。在研究期间,该发生率从0.10%显著增加至0.32%(P <.001)。更具体地说,除BMI <18.5或年龄<20岁的女性外,所有分析亚组的发生率均显著增加。为评估风险因素的重要性,创建了一种实用且简单的肩难产风险评分工具。与非糖尿病、非肥胖且孕周<41周自然分娩的年轻女性相比,器械助产、任何类型的母亲糖尿病、BMI≥25、年龄≥40岁和孕周≥41周与更高的肩难产风险相关。在我们的风险评分工具中,发生肩难产的病例的风险点数显著高于未发生肩难产的病例(15.2对10.4,P <.001)。当评分≥18分时,风险显著升高(相对风险9.54,95%置信区间8.61 - 10.57)。
在研究期间,芬兰肩难产的发生率有所增加,但与其他国家先前的研究相比仍较低。在临床日常实践中,新的肩难产风险评分工具有助于评估产妇的个体风险状况。根据该风险评分工具,器械助产、母亲糖尿病、BMI≥25、年龄≥40岁和孕周≥41周的组合风险最高。