• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发患者和家庭为中心的查房主持人赋能行为评价工具的效度证据。

Developing Validity Evidence for a Patient- and Family-Centered Rounds Presenter Empowerment Action Rating Tool.

机构信息

Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, Wis.

Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, Wis.

出版信息

Acad Pediatr. 2021 Apr;21(3):569-574. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2020.09.015. Epub 2020 Oct 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.acap.2020.09.015
PMID:33038567
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Training in patient- and family-centered care is endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) for learners. The AAP recommends patient- and family-centered rounds (PFCR) during inpatient care. The PEA-21 (21-item Presenter Empowerment Action checklist) was developed to evaluate presenter behavior during PFCR.

OBJECTIVE

To gather validity evidence for the PEA-21 in evaluating third year medical student and intern presentations during PFCR in the domains of Data Accuracy, Communication Skills, Assessment and Plan Formation, and Family Interaction.

METHODS

A 24-month prospective cohort study of students and interns presenting on PFCR. Content, response process, internal structure, and relationship with other variables were assessed.

RESULTS

Data were collected from 101 rounds (758 individual patient encounters), both on pediatric subspecialty and hospital medicine teams. Presenters included third- and fourth-year medical students and interns in pediatrics, internal medicine-pediatrics, and family-medicine. Intraclass correlations between observers ranged from 0.5 to 0.72. Internal consistency showed α >0.7 for 3 of 4 domains. Interns scored higher than students across domains (P< .01), but students' scores improved throughout their rotations (d = 0.2-0.8). Both groups performed lowest in the Family Interaction Domain.

CONCLUSIONS

The PEA-21 showed strong validity properties including content, response process, internal structure, and relationship with other variables and can be used by educators to assess learners' skill levels and provide formative feedback to both medical students and interns. Targeted efforts are needed to improve skills within the Family Interaction Domain for both medical students and interns.

摘要

背景

以患者和家庭为中心的培训得到了美国儿科学会(AAP)和研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)的认可,适用于学习者。AAP 建议在住院患者护理期间进行以患者和家庭为中心的查房(PFCR)。PEA-21(21 项演讲者赋权行为清单)是为了评估 PFCR 期间演讲者的行为而开发的。

目的

在数据准确性、沟通技巧、评估和计划制定以及家庭互动等领域,为评估医学生和住院医师在 PFCR 中的演讲表现,收集 PEA-21 的有效性证据。

方法

对在 PFCR 中进行演讲的医学生和住院医师进行了为期 24 个月的前瞻性队列研究。评估了内容、反应过程、内部结构以及与其他变量的关系。

结果

共收集了 101 轮(758 例患者)的数据,涉及儿科专科和医院医学团队。演讲者包括儿科、内科-儿科和家庭医学的三年级和四年级医学生和住院医师。观察者之间的组内相关系数范围为 0.5 至 0.72。4 个领域中有 3 个领域的内部一致性α值>0.7。住院医师在所有领域的得分均高于医学生(P<0.01),但学生的得分在整个轮转过程中有所提高(d=0.2-0.8)。两组在家庭互动领域的得分最低。

结论

PEA-21 具有很强的有效性,包括内容、反应过程、内部结构以及与其他变量的关系,可以被教育工作者用来评估学习者的技能水平,并为医学生和住院医师提供形成性反馈。需要有针对性地努力提高医学生和住院医师在家庭互动领域的技能。

相似文献

1
Developing Validity Evidence for a Patient- and Family-Centered Rounds Presenter Empowerment Action Rating Tool.开发患者和家庭为中心的查房主持人赋能行为评价工具的效度证据。
Acad Pediatr. 2021 Apr;21(3):569-574. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2020.09.015. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
2
Teaching Inpatient Bedside Presenter Empowerment Actions During an Interactive Workshop.在互动研讨会上教授住院患者床边汇报人的赋权行动。
MedEdPORTAL. 2018 Apr 6;14:10702. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10702.
3
Medical Student Participation in Patient- and Family-Centered Rounding: A National Survey of Pediatric Clerkships.医学生参与以患者和家庭为中心的查房:一项全国儿科实习调查。
Acad Pediatr. 2019 Jul;19(5):549-554. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2018.12.010. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
4
The IDEA Assessment Tool: Assessing the Reporting, Diagnostic Reasoning, and Decision-Making Skills Demonstrated in Medical Students' Hospital Admission Notes.IDEA评估工具:评估医学生住院病历中展示的报告、诊断推理和决策技能。
Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(2):163-73. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1011654.
5
The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study.学习者对内科查房的看法:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2010 Jul 9;10:53. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-10-53.
6
The effect of medical education on students' patient-satisfaction ratings.医学教育对学生患者满意度评分的影响。
Acad Med. 1997 Jan;72(1):57-61.
7
Performance-based assessment of internal medicine interns: evaluation of baseline clinical and communication skills.基于表现的内科实习医生评估:基线临床和沟通技能评估
Acad Med. 2002 Nov;77(11):1158. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200211000-00023.
8
Designing and Implementing a Novel Virtual Rounds Curriculum for Medical Students' Internal Medicine Clerkship During the COVID-19 Pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间为医学生内科实习设计和实施新型虚拟查房课程。
MedEdPORTAL. 2021 Mar 2;17:11106. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11106.
9
Using an Entrustable Professional Activity to Assess Consultation Requests Called on an Internal Medicine Teaching Service.利用可托付专业活动评估内科教学服务中接到的会诊请求
MedEdPORTAL. 2019 Nov 22;15:10854. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10854.
10
Third-year medical students' evaluation of hospitalist and nonhospitalist faculty during the inpatient portion of their pediatrics clerkships.三年级医学生在儿科实习住院期间对住院医师和非住院医师教员的评价。
J Hosp Med. 2007 Jan;2(1):17-22. doi: 10.1002/jhm.145.