Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.
Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-Ku, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan.
J Affect Disord. 2021 Jan 15;279:20-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.09.118. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
The relationship between depression and personality has long been suggested, however, biomarker investigations for depression have mostly overlooked this connection.
We collected personality traits from 100 drug-free patients with major depressive disorders (MDD) and 100 healthy controls based on the Five-Factor Model (FFM) such as Neuroticism (N) and Extraversion (E), and also obtained 63 plasma metabolites profiles by LCMS-based metabolome analysis.
Partitional clustering analysis using the NEO-FFI data classified all subjects into three major clusters. Eighty-six subjects belonging to Cluster 1 (C1: less personality-biased group) constituted half of MDD patients and half of healthy controls. C2 constituted 50 subjects mainly MDD patients (N + E ), and C3 constituted 64 subjects mainly healthy subjects (N + E ). Using metabolome information, the machine learning model was optimized to discriminate MDD patients from healthy controls among all subjects and C1, respectively. The performance of the model for all subjects was moderate (AUC = 0. 715), while the performance was extremely improved when limited to C1 (AUC = 0. 907). Tryptophan-pathway plasma metabolites including tryptophan, serotonin and kynurenine were significantly lower in MDD patients especially among C1. We also validated metabolomic findings using a social-defeat mice model of stress-induced depression.
A case-control study design and sample size is not large.
Our results suggest that personality classification enhances blood biomarker analysis for MDD patients and further translational investigations should be conducted to clarify the biological relationship between personality traits, stress and depression.
抑郁与人格之间的关系早已被提出,但针对抑郁的生物标志物研究大多忽略了这一联系。
我们根据五因素模型(FFM),如神经质(N)和外向性(E),从 100 名未服用药物的重度抑郁症(MDD)患者和 100 名健康对照者中收集了人格特质,还通过基于 LCMS 的代谢组学分析获得了 63 种血浆代谢物图谱。
使用 NEO-FFI 数据的分区聚类分析将所有受试者分为三个主要聚类。属于聚类 1(C1:人格偏差较小组)的 86 名受试者包括一半的 MDD 患者和一半的健康对照者。C2 由 50 名主要为 MDD 患者(N+E)组成,C3 由 64 名主要为健康受试者(N+E)组成。使用代谢组学信息,优化了机器学习模型以区分所有受试者和 C1 中的 MDD 患者和健康对照者。该模型对所有受试者的性能为中等(AUC=0.715),但当仅限于 C1 时,性能得到了极大提高(AUC=0.907)。色氨酸途径的血浆代谢物,包括色氨酸、血清素和犬尿氨酸,在 MDD 患者中,尤其是在 C1 中显著降低。我们还使用应激诱导抑郁的社交挫败小鼠模型验证了代谢组学发现。
病例对照研究设计和样本量不大。
我们的结果表明,人格分类增强了 MDD 患者血液生物标志物分析,进一步的转化研究应进行以阐明人格特质、应激和抑郁之间的生物学关系。