• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

降低生育治疗多胎妊娠的资金和公共报告策略。

Funding and public reporting strategies for reducing multiple pregnancy from fertility treatments.

机构信息

National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit, Centre for Big Data Research in Health and School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit, Centre for Big Data Research in Health and School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 2020 Oct;114(4):715-721. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.08.1405.

DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.08.1405
PMID:33040980
Abstract

The health of children born through assisted reproductive technologies (ART) is particularly vulnerable to policy decisions and market forces that play out before they are even conceived. ART treatment is costly, and public and third-party funding varies significantly between and within countries, leading to considerable variation in consumer affordability globally. These relative cost differences affect not only who can afford to access ART treatment, but also how ART is practiced in terms of embryo transfer practices, with less affordable treatment creating a financial incentive to transfer more than one embryo to maximize the pregnancy rates in fewer cycles. One mechanism for reducing the burden of excessive multiple pregnancies is to link insurance coverage to the number of embryos that can be transferred; another is to combine supportive funding with patient and clinician education and public reporting that emphasizes a "complete" ART cycle (all embryo transfers associated with an egg retrieval) and penalizes multiple embryo transfers. Improving funding for fertility services in a way that respects clinician and patient autonomy and allows patients to undertake a sufficient number of cycles to minimize moral hazard improves outcomes for mothers and babies while reducing the long-term economic burden associated with fertility treatments.

摘要

通过辅助生殖技术(ART)出生的儿童的健康特别容易受到政策决策和市场力量的影响,而这些决策和力量在他们出生之前就已经在发挥作用。ART 治疗费用高昂,公共和第三方资金在国家之间和内部差异很大,导致全球消费者的负担能力存在相当大的差异。这些相对成本差异不仅影响谁有能力获得 ART 治疗,还影响胚胎转移实践中的 ART 实践,负担能力较低的治疗会产生将多个胚胎转移以在较少周期内最大化妊娠率的经济激励。减少过度多胎妊娠负担的一种机制是将保险范围与可转移胚胎的数量联系起来;另一种机制是将支持性资金与患者和临床医生的教育以及强调“完整”ART 周期(与卵母细胞回收相关的所有胚胎转移)和惩罚多胚胎转移的公共报告结合起来。以尊重临床医生和患者自主权的方式改善生育服务的资金,使患者能够进行足够数量的周期以最小化道德风险,从而改善母婴的结果,同时减轻与生育治疗相关的长期经济负担。

相似文献

1
Funding and public reporting strategies for reducing multiple pregnancy from fertility treatments.降低生育治疗多胎妊娠的资金和公共报告策略。
Fertil Steril. 2020 Oct;114(4):715-721. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.08.1405.
2
Avoiding multiple pregnancies in assisted reproductive technologies: transferring one embryo at a time should be the norm.避免辅助生殖技术中的多胎妊娠:每次转移一个胚胎应成为常规。
Fertil Steril. 2020 Oct;114(4):671-672. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.08.1404.
3
Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2011.辅助生殖技术监测——美国,2011 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014 Nov 21;63(10):1-28.
4
Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance — United States, 2012.辅助生殖技术监测—美国,2012 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015 Aug 14;64(6):1-29.
5
Assisted reproductive technology surveillance -- United States, 2010.辅助生殖技术监测--美国,2010 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2013 Dec 6;62(9):1-24.
6
Assisted reproductive technology: public funding and the voluntary shift to single embryo transfer in Australia.辅助生殖技术:澳大利亚公共资金与自愿向单胚胎移植的转变。
Med J Aust. 2011 Nov 21;195(10):594-8. doi: 10.5694/mja10.11448.
7
Why are multiple pregnancy rates and single embryo transfer rates so different globally, and what do we do about it?为什么全球范围内多胎妊娠率和单胚胎移植率如此不同,我们对此该怎么办?
Fertil Steril. 2020 Oct;114(4):680-689. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.09.003. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
8
Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - 
United States, 2013.辅助生殖技术监测报告——美国,2013 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015 Dec 4;64(11):1-25. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6411a1.
9
International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: assisted reproductive technology 2012†.国际辅助生殖技术监测委员会世界报告:辅助生殖技术 2012 年报告†。
Hum Reprod. 2020 Aug 1;35(8):1900-1913. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa090.
10
International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART) world report: assisted reproductive technology 2004.国际辅助生殖技术监测委员会(ICMART)世界报告:辅助生殖技术 2004 年报告。
Hum Reprod. 2013 May;28(5):1375-90. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det036. Epub 2013 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Health insurance integration and fertility intentions among migrant populations in China: evidence from urban-rural medical reform.中国流动人口的医疗保险整合与生育意愿:来自城乡医疗改革的证据
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Aug 13;25(1):1073. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13257-9.
2
Live birth rate and perinatal outcomes following sequential embryo transfer in women with recurrent implantation failure undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles.在接受冻融胚胎移植周期的反复植入失败女性中,序贯胚胎移植后的活产率和围产期结局。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Apr 11;25(1):433. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07557-5.
3
Perceptions of Health System Professionals on Integrating Fertility Care into Reproductive Health Policy in China.
中国卫生系统专业人员对将生育保健纳入生殖健康政策的看法。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Mar 4;13(5):555. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13050555.
4
Perinatal deaths in twin and singleton infants in Ireland: A comparison of characteristics and causes.爱尔兰双胎和单胎婴儿的围产期死亡:特征与原因的比较
Ir J Med Sci. 2025 Feb;194(1):167-180. doi: 10.1007/s11845-024-03829-9. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
5
Feasibility analysis of China's medical insurance coverage of assisted reproductive technology.中国将辅助生殖技术纳入医保的可行性分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 5;14(1):7998. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58640-4.
6
Chronic kidney disease, female infertility, and medically assisted reproduction: a best practice position statement by the Kidney and Pregnancy Group of the Italian Society of Nephrology.慢性肾脏病、女性不孕和医学辅助生殖:意大利肾脏病学会肾脏与妊娠组的最佳实践立场声明。
J Nephrol. 2023 Jun;36(5):1239-1255. doi: 10.1007/s40620-023-01670-4. Epub 2023 Jun 24.
7
Does fertilization (IVF) treatment provide good value for money? A cost-benefit analysis.体外受精(IVF)治疗是否物有所值?一项成本效益分析。
Front Glob Womens Health. 2023 Mar 1;4:971553. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.971553. eCollection 2023.
8
Valuing infertility treatment: Why QALYs are inadequate, and an alternative approach to cost-effectiveness thresholds.重视不孕治疗:为何质量调整生命年(QALYs)并不充分,以及成本效益阈值的替代方法。
Front Med Technol. 2022 Dec 23;4:1053719. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2022.1053719. eCollection 2022.
9
2017-2018 Assisted Reproduction Cost Analysis Performance Indexes: Lombardy County Case Study.2017 - 2018年辅助生殖成本分析绩效指标:伦巴第大区案例研究
Front Reprod Health. 2021 Aug 12;3:693715. doi: 10.3389/frph.2021.693715. eCollection 2021.
10
Cumulative live birth rate according to the number of receiving governmental subsidies for assisted reproductive technology in Saitama Prefecture, Japan: A retrospective study using individual data for governmental subsidies.日本埼玉县辅助生殖技术接受政府补贴数量对应的累积活产率:一项使用政府补贴个人数据的回顾性研究。
Reprod Med Biol. 2021 Jun 20;20(4):451-459. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12397. eCollection 2021 Oct.