Chamberlain Catherine, Gee Graham, Gartland Deirdre, Mensah Fiona K, Mares Sarah, Clark Yvonne, Ralph Naomi, Atkinson Caroline, Hirvonen Tanja, McLachlan Helen, Edwards Tahnia, Herrman Helen, Brown Stephanie J, Nicholson And Jan M
Judith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
NGANGK YIRA: Murdoch University Research Centre for Aboriginal Health and Social Equity, Perth, WA, Australia.
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 15;11:2014. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02014. eCollection 2020.
Becoming a parent can be an exciting and also challenging transition, particularly for parents who have experienced significant hurt in their own childhoods, and may be experiencing 'complex trauma.' Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (Aboriginal) people also experience historical trauma. While the parenting transition is an important time to offer support for parents, it is essential to ensure that the benefits of identifying parents experiencing complex trauma outweigh any risks (e.g., stigmatization). This paper describes views of predominantly Aboriginal stakeholders regarding (1) the relative importance of domains proposed for complex trauma assessment, and (2) how to conduct these sensitive discussions with Aboriginal parents.
A co-design workshop was held in Alice Springs (Central Australia) as part of an Aboriginal-led community-based participatory action research project. Workshop participants were 57 predominantly Aboriginal stakeholders with expertise in community, clinical, policy and academic settings. Twelve domains of complex trauma-related distress had been identified in existing assessment tools and through community consultation. Using story-telling and strategies to create safety for discussing complex and sensitive issues, and delphi-style methods, stakeholders rated the level of importance of the 12 domains; and discussed why, by whom, where and how experiences of complex trauma should be explored.
The majority of stakeholders supported the importance of assessing each of the proposed complex trauma domains with Aboriginal parents. However, strong concerns were expressed regarding where, by whom and how this should occur. There was greater emphasis and consistency regarding 'qualities' (e.g., caring), rather than specific 'attributes' (e.g., clinician). Six critical overarching themes emerged: ensuring emotional and cultural safety; establishing relationships and trust; having capacity to respond appropriately and access support; incorporating less direct cultural communication methods (e.g., yarning, dadirri); using strengths-based approaches and offering choices to empower parents; and showing respect, caring and compassion.
Assessments to identify Aboriginal parents experiencing complex trauma should only be considered when the prerequisites of safety, trusting relationships, respect, compassion, adequate care, and capacity to respond are assured. Offering choices and cultural and strengths-based approaches are also critical. Without this assurance, there are serious concerns that harms may outweigh any benefits for Aboriginal parents.
为人父母是一个既令人兴奋又充满挑战的转变过程,对于那些在自己童年时期遭受过重大创伤、可能正经历“复杂创伤”的父母来说尤其如此。澳大利亚原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民(原住民)还经历着历史创伤。虽然育儿转变期是为父母提供支持的重要时机,但必须确保识别出经历复杂创伤的父母所带来的益处大于任何风险(例如污名化)。本文描述了主要由原住民利益相关者提出的关于(1)复杂创伤评估所提议领域的相对重要性,以及(2)如何与原住民父母进行这些敏感讨论的观点。
作为一个由原住民主导的基于社区的参与性行动研究项目的一部分,在澳大利亚中部的爱丽丝泉举办了一次联合设计研讨会。研讨会参与者是57位主要来自原住民社区、临床、政策和学术领域的利益相关者,他们具有相关专业知识。在现有的评估工具中以及通过社区协商,确定了与复杂创伤相关困扰的12个领域。利用讲故事以及为讨论复杂和敏感问题营造安全氛围的策略,还有德尔菲法,利益相关者对这12个领域的重要性程度进行了评级;并讨论了为何、由谁、在何处以及如何探讨复杂创伤经历。
大多数利益相关者支持与原住民父母一起评估每个提议的复杂创伤领域的重要性。然而,他们对评估应在何处、由谁以及如何进行表达了强烈担忧。对于“品质”(如关爱),而非具体的“属性”(如临床医生),有更强的强调和一致性。出现了六个关键的总体主题:确保情感和文化安全;建立关系与信任;有能力做出适当回应并获得支持;采用不太直接的文化交流方式(如交谈、深度聆听);运用基于优势的方法并提供选择以增强父母的权能;以及表现出尊重、关爱和同情。
只有在确保安全、信任关系、尊重、同情、充分关怀以及回应能力等前提条件下,才应考虑进行评估以识别经历复杂创伤的原住民父母。提供选择以及基于文化和优势的方法也至关重要。如果没有这种保障,人们严重担忧对原住民父母而言,危害可能会超过任何益处。