• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与行动研究——达迪里-甘马,使用“亚林”:与原住民社区成员共同设计方法。

Participatory Action Research-Dadirri-Ganma, using Yarning: methodology co-design with Aboriginal community members.

机构信息

Chettinad College of Nursing (CCN), Chettinad Academy of Research and Education (CARE), Chettinad Health City, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, OMR, 603103, Kelambakkam, Tamil Nadu, Chennai, India.

Dr. M.G.R Educational and Research Institute, Maduravoil, Chennai, India.

出版信息

Int J Equity Health. 2021 Jul 12;20(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01493-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12939-021-01493-4
PMID:34247644
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8274049/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Appropriate choice of research design is essential to rightly understand the research problem and derive optimal solutions. The Comorbidity Action in the North project sought to better meet the needs of local people affected by drug, alcohol and mental health comorbidity. The aim of the study focused on the needs of Aboriginal peoples and on developing a truly representative research process. A methodology evolved that best suited working with members of a marginalised Aboriginal community. This paper discusses the process of co-design of a Western methodology (participatory action research) in conjunction with the Indigenous methodologies Dadirri and Ganma. This co-design enabled an international PhD student to work respectfully with Aboriginal community members and Elders, health professionals and consumers, and non-Indigenous service providers in a drug and alcohol and mental health comorbidity project in Adelaide, South Australia.

METHODS

The PhD student, Aboriginal Elder mentor, Aboriginal Working Party, and supervisors (the research team) sought to co-design a methodology and applied it to address the following challenges: the PhD student was an international student with no existing relationship with local Aboriginal community members; many Aboriginal people deeply distrust Western research due to past poor practices and a lack of implementation of findings into practice; Aboriginal people often remain unheard, unacknowledged and unrecognised in research projects; drug and alcohol and mental health comorbidity experiences are often distressing for Aboriginal community members and their families; attempts to access comorbidity care often result in limited or no access; and Aboriginal community members experience acts of racism and discrimination as health professionals and consumers of health and support services. The research team considered deeply how knowledge is shared, interpreted, owned and controlled, by whom and how, within research, co-morbidity care and community settings. The PhD student was supported to co-design a methodology that was equitable, democratic, liberating and life-enhancing, with real potential to develop feasible solutions.

RESULTS

The resulting combined Participatory Action Research (PAR)-Dadirri-Ganma methodology sought to create a bridge across Western and Aboriginal knowledges, understanding and experiences. Foundation pillars of this bridge were mentoring of the PhD student by senior Elders, who explained and demonstrated the critical importance of Yarning (consulting) and Indigenous methodologies of Dadirri (deep listening) and Ganma (two-way knowledge sharing), and discussions among all involved about the principles of Western PAR.

CONCLUSIONS

Concepts within this paper are shared from the perspective of the PhD student with the permission and support of local Elders and Working Group members. The intention is to share what was learned for the benefit of other students, research projects and community members who are beginning a similar journey.

摘要

背景

适当选择研究设计对于正确理解研究问题并得出最佳解决方案至关重要。“北方共病行动”项目旨在更好地满足受药物、酒精和精神健康共病影响的当地民众的需求。该研究的重点是满足原住民的需求,并开发一种真正具有代表性的研究过程。为此,我们制定了一种最适合与边缘化的原住民社区成员合作的方法。本文讨论了将西方方法论(参与式行动研究)与本土方法 Dadirri 和 Ganma 共同设计的过程。这种共同设计使一名国际博士生能够在南澳大利亚阿德莱德的一个药物、酒精和精神健康共病项目中,尊重地与原住民社区成员、长者、卫生专业人员和消费者以及非原住民服务提供者合作。

方法

博士生、原住民长者导师、原住民工作组和导师(研究团队)试图共同设计一种方法,并将其应用于以下挑战:博士生是一名国际学生,与当地原住民社区成员没有现有关系;许多原住民因过去的不良做法以及研究结果未能付诸实践而对西方研究深感不信任;原住民在研究项目中往往被忽视、不被承认和不被认可;药物、酒精和精神健康共病经历常常使原住民社区成员及其家人感到痛苦;尝试获得共病护理通常导致有限或无法获得护理;原住民社区成员在作为卫生专业人员和卫生及支持服务的消费者时会经历种族主义和歧视行为。研究团队深入考虑了在研究、共病护理和社区环境中,知识是如何由谁以何种方式共享、解释、拥有和控制的。博士生在导师的支持下共同设计了一种公平、民主、解放和增强生活的方法,具有切实可行的解决方案的发展潜力。

结果

由此产生的结合参与式行动研究(PAR)-Dadirri-Ganma 方法旨在在西方和原住民知识、理解和经验之间架起一座桥梁。这座桥梁的基础支柱是由资深长者对博士生进行指导,他们解释并强调了 Yarning(咨询)和原住民方法 Dadirri(深度倾听)和 Ganma(双向知识共享)的重要性,并让所有相关人员讨论了西方 PAR 的原则。

结论

本文的概念是在当地长者和工作组成员的许可和支持下,从博士生的角度分享的。目的是为其他学生、研究项目和正在开始类似旅程的社区成员分享经验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f27/8274049/054ff76512c8/12939_2021_1493_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f27/8274049/adbcfec0168f/12939_2021_1493_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f27/8274049/054ff76512c8/12939_2021_1493_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f27/8274049/adbcfec0168f/12939_2021_1493_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f27/8274049/054ff76512c8/12939_2021_1493_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Participatory Action Research-Dadirri-Ganma, using Yarning: methodology co-design with Aboriginal community members.参与行动研究——达迪里-甘马,使用“亚林”:与原住民社区成员共同设计方法。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Jul 12;20(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01493-4.
2
Codesigning culturally safe oral health care with First Nations Kidney Warriors experiencing kidney disease in South Australia.与在南澳大利亚州患有肾脏疾病的第一民族肾病战士共同设计文化安全的口腔保健。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jul 30;24(1):864. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04617-8.
3
Aboriginal patients driving kidney and healthcare improvements: recommendations from South Australian community consultations.原住民患者推动肾脏和医疗保健的改善:来自南澳大利亚社区咨询的建议。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2022 Oct;46(5):622-629. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.13279. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
4
Real Ways of Working Together: co-creating meaningful Aboriginal community consultations to advance kidney care.真正的合作方式:共同创建有意义的原住民社区咨询,以推进肾脏护理。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2022 Oct;46(5):614-621. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.13280. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
5
"It's research, our input can grow": identifying health research priorities with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities-study protocol.“这是研究,我们的投入能够增加”:与原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民社区共同确定健康研究重点——研究方案
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jul 28;9(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00467-w.
6
Utilizing Aboriginal Participatory Action Research-Dadirri-Ganma to Co-Design the Deadly Dental Home.利用原住民参与式行动研究——达迪里——甘马共同设计致命的牙科之家。
Qual Health Res. 2025 Apr 28:10497323251335837. doi: 10.1177/10497323251335837.
7
Walking together in friendship: Learning about cultural safety in mainstream mental health services through Aboriginal Participatory Action Research.携手共建友谊:通过原住民参与式行动研究了解主流心理健康服务中的文化安全。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2024 Jun;58(6):498-505. doi: 10.1177/00048674241246444. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
8
Using a participatory action research framework to listen to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australia about pandemic influenza.运用参与式行动研究框架,倾听澳大利亚原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民关于大流行性流感的看法。
Rural Remote Health. 2015 Jul-Sep;15(3):2923. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
9
Exploring self-determined solutions to service and system challenges to promote social and emotional wellbeing in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people: a qualitative study.探索自主解决方案,以应对服务和系统挑战,促进澳大利亚原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民的社会和情感福祉:一项定性研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 22;11:1206371. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1206371. eCollection 2023.
10
‘We’re also healers’: Elders leading the way in Aboriginal community healing.“我们也是疗愈者”:原住民长者引领社区疗愈之路。
Aust J Prim Health. 2022 Aug;28(4):283-288. doi: 10.1071/PY21289.

引用本文的文献

1
LGBT+ concerns of ageing and accessing aged care services in Australia: A cross-sectional study.澳大利亚LGBT+群体的老龄化问题及获得老年护理服务情况:一项横断面研究。
Australas J Ageing. 2025 Sep;44(3):e70084. doi: 10.1111/ajag.70084.
2
What do Aboriginal people in the Northern Territory value during the operation journey? A qualitative study.北领地的原住民在手术过程中重视什么?一项定性研究。
Med J Aust. 2025 Jul 7;223(1):30-37. doi: 10.5694/mja2.52695.
3
Understanding co-production of injury research in Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities: a comprehensive scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
Trust, culture and communication: determinants of eye health and care among Indigenous people with diabetes in Australia.信任、文化和沟通:澳大利亚糖尿病原住民眼部健康和护理的决定因素。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Jan 9;5(1):e001999. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001999. eCollection 2020.
2
Implementing research findings into practice: frameworks and guidance.将研究结果付诸实践:框架与指南。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2019 Jun;17 Suppl 1:S18-S21. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000195.
3
Comorbidity Action in the North: a study of services for people with comorbid mental health and drug and alcohol disorders in the northern suburbs of Adelaide.
理解澳大利亚原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民社区伤害研究的共同生产:一项全面的范围审查。
Inj Epidemiol. 2025 Jan 7;12(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40621-024-00556-8.
4
Co-design in healthcare with and for First Nations Peoples of the land now known as Australia: a narrative review.与现今被称为澳大利亚的这片土地上的原住民共同开展医疗保健领域的共同设计:一项叙述性综述。
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jan 6;24(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02358-2.
5
Integrating the Sufficiency Economy Royal Philosophy and Participatory Action Research Approach to Promote Self-Care for Stroke Prevention in Selected Communities of Southern Thailand.将充足经济皇家理念与参与式行动研究方法相结合,以促进泰国南部部分社区的中风预防自我保健。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jul 9;12(14):1367. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12141367.
6
Looking after bubba for all our mob: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community experiences and perceptions of stillbirth.照顾我们所有人的宝贝:原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民社区对死产的经历和看法。
Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 16;12:1385125. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1385125. eCollection 2024.
7
A community-embedded approach to increasing the health literacy of Aboriginal children in a regional area: processes of co-design and local implementation.社区嵌入方法提高区域内原住民儿童的健康素养:共同设计和当地实施的过程。
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 6;12:1355603. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1355603. eCollection 2024.
8
How Can We Find Out What Indigenous Children and Their Families Need to Manage Weight? Lessons from Formative Nutrition Intervention Research with First Australians.我们如何了解原住民儿童及其家庭在体重管理方面的需求?从针对澳大利亚原住民的营养干预形成性研究中得到的经验教训。
Nutrients. 2023 Dec 1;15(23):4982. doi: 10.3390/nu15234982.
9
Development and usability of a Mobile Interactive Application (VCPW) for Vascular Crisis Prewarning after Skin Flap Transplantation.一种用于皮瓣移植术后血管危象预警的移动交互式应用程序(VCPW)的开发与可用性
JPRAS Open. 2023 Jun 26;37:109-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2023.06.012. eCollection 2023 Sep.
10
Roles, outcomes, and enablers within research partnerships: A rapid review of the literature on patient and public involvement and engagement in health research.研究伙伴关系中的角色、成果与促进因素:关于患者及公众参与健康研究的文献快速综述
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jun 15;9(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00448-z.
北部地区的共病行动:对阿德莱德北郊患有心理健康与药物及酒精障碍共病患者的服务研究
Australas Psychiatry. 2016 Dec;24(6):592-597. doi: 10.1177/1039856216657694. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
4
Role of non-Indigenous researchers in Indigenous health research in Australia: a review of the literature.非本土研究人员在澳大利亚本土健康研究中的作用:文献综述
Aust Health Rev. 2016 Sep;40(4):459-465. doi: 10.1071/AH15103.
5
Through a critical lens: indigenist research and the dadirri method.透过批判的视角:本土主义研究与 dadirri 方法。
Qual Health Res. 2012 Nov;22(11):1582-90. doi: 10.1177/1049732312457596. Epub 2012 Aug 31.