Hommel Bernhard
Cognitive Psychology Unit, Institute for Psychological Research & Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, NL.
Department of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, CN.
J Cogn. 2020 Sep 29;3(1):29. doi: 10.5334/joc.114.
Theorizing on dual- and multi-tasking has not made much progress since the early insight of Telford (1931) and Welford (1952) that response selection may represent a bottleneck in human information processing. A closer look reveals that the questions being asked in dual-task research are not particularly interesting or realistic, and the answers being given lack mechanistic detail. In fact, present theorizing can be considered mere empirical generalization, which has led to merely labeling processing bottlenecks rather than describing how they operate and how they actually produce the bottleneck. As a template for how to overcome this theoretical gap, the Theory of Event Coding (TEC) is applied to dual-task performance. It is shown that TEC, which has not been developed to account for, and has not yet been applied to dual-task performance and its deficits, can nevertheless easily account for the key findings guiding resource and stage theories, while making the underlying mechanisms explicit and transparent. It is thus suggested to consider multitasking costs a mere byproduct of the typical functioning of the cognitive system that needs no dedicated niche theorizing. Rather, what is needed is more mechanistic detail and a more integrative account that can deal with findings related to both resource theory and stage theory.
自从特尔福德(1931年)和韦尔福德(1952年)早期提出反应选择可能是人类信息处理的瓶颈这一观点以来,关于双重任务和多任务处理的理论研究并没有取得太大进展。仔细观察会发现,双重任务研究中提出的问题并不特别有趣或现实,给出的答案也缺乏机制细节。事实上,目前的理论可以被认为仅仅是经验性的概括,这仅仅导致了对处理瓶颈的标记,而没有描述它们是如何运作的以及它们实际上是如何产生瓶颈的。作为克服这一理论差距的模板,事件编码理论(TEC)被应用于双重任务表现。结果表明,虽然事件编码理论并非为解释双重任务表现及其缺陷而发展,也尚未应用于双重任务表现及其缺陷,但它仍然可以轻松地解释指导资源理论和阶段理论的关键发现,同时使潜在机制变得明确和透明。因此,建议将多任务成本视为认知系统典型功能的一个副产品,无需专门的小众理论来解释。相反,需要的是更多的机制细节和一个更综合的解释,以处理与资源理论和阶段理论相关的发现。