• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

执行功能的个体间差异预测多任务处理表现——对中央注意力瓶颈的启示

Inter-Individual Differences in Executive Functions Predict Multitasking Performance - Implications for the Central Attentional Bottleneck.

作者信息

Szameitat André J

机构信息

Center for Cognitive Neuroscience (CCN), Division of Psychology, Department of Life Sciences, College of Health and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 May 11;13:778966. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.778966. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.778966
PMID:35645928
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9131123/
Abstract

Human multitasking suffers from a central attentional bottleneck preventing parallel performance of central mental operations, leading to profound deferments in task performance. While previous research assumed that the deferment is caused by a mere waiting time (refractory period), we show that the bottleneck requires executive functions (EF; active scheduling account) accounting for a profound part of the deferment. Three participant groups with EF impairments (dyslexics, highly neurotics, deprived smokers) showed worse multitasking performance than respective control groups. Three further groups with EF improvements (video-gamers, bilinguals, coffee consumers) showed improved multitasking. Finally, three groups performed a dual-task and different measures of EF (reading span, rotation span, symmetry span) and showed significant correlations between multitasking performance and working memory capacity. Demands on EF during multitasking may cause more errors, mental fatigue and stress, with parts of the population being considerably more prone to this.

摘要

人类的多任务处理存在一个核心注意力瓶颈,它阻碍了中枢心理操作的并行执行,导致任务执行出现严重延迟。虽然先前的研究认为这种延迟仅仅是由等待时间(不应期)造成的,但我们发现,这个瓶颈需要执行功能(EF;主动调度理论)来解释延迟的很大一部分原因。三组存在执行功能障碍的参与者(诵读困难者、高神经质者、戒烟者)在多任务处理表现上比各自的对照组更差。另外三组执行功能得到改善的参与者(电子游戏玩家、双语者、咖啡饮用者)在多任务处理方面表现更佳。最后,三组参与者执行了一项双重任务以及不同的执行功能测量(阅读广度、旋转广度、对称广度),结果显示多任务处理表现与工作记忆容量之间存在显著相关性。多任务处理期间对执行功能的需求可能会导致更多错误、精神疲劳和压力,部分人群更容易受到影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/361a/9131123/653092daeaa9/fpsyg-13-778966-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/361a/9131123/eb4ef0f473d0/fpsyg-13-778966-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/361a/9131123/f13491356a16/fpsyg-13-778966-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/361a/9131123/653092daeaa9/fpsyg-13-778966-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/361a/9131123/eb4ef0f473d0/fpsyg-13-778966-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/361a/9131123/f13491356a16/fpsyg-13-778966-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/361a/9131123/653092daeaa9/fpsyg-13-778966-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Inter-Individual Differences in Executive Functions Predict Multitasking Performance - Implications for the Central Attentional Bottleneck.执行功能的个体间差异预测多任务处理表现——对中央注意力瓶颈的启示
Front Psychol. 2022 May 11;13:778966. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.778966. eCollection 2022.
2
The working memory costs of a central attentional bottleneck in multitasking.多任务处理中心注意瓶颈的工作记忆成本。
Psychol Res. 2022 Sep;86(6):1774-1791. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01615-1. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
3
Central as well as Peripheral Attentional Bottlenecks in Dual-Task Performance Activate Lateral Prefrontal Cortices.双重任务执行中的中枢及外周注意力瓶颈激活外侧前额叶皮层。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Mar 16;10:119. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00119. eCollection 2016.
4
Efficient multitasking: parallel versus serial processing of multiple tasks.高效多任务处理:多个任务的并行与串行处理
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 8;6:1366. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01366. eCollection 2015.
5
Multitasking While Driving: Central Bottleneck or Problem State Interference?驾驶时的多任务处理:中央瓶颈还是问题状态干扰?
Hum Factors. 2024 May;66(5):1564-1582. doi: 10.1177/00187208221143857. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
6
Task errors by emergency physicians are associated with interruptions, multitasking, fatigue and working memory capacity: a prospective, direct observation study.急诊医师的任务错误与中断、多任务处理、疲劳和工作记忆容量有关:一项前瞻性、直接观察研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Aug;27(8):655-663. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007333. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
7
Multitasking behavior and its related constructs: Executive functions, working memory capacity, relational integration, and divided attention.多重任务行为及其相关构念:执行功能、工作记忆容量、关系整合和分散注意力。
Cognition. 2019 Aug;189:275-298. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.04.010. Epub 2019 May 17.
8
Evidence of resource sharing in the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm.心理不应期(PRP)范式中的资源共享证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2022 Nov;48(11):1279-1293. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001052. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
9
Working memory capacity and dual-task interference in picture naming.图片命名中的工作记忆容量与双重任务干扰
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Mar;142(3):332-42. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.01.006. Epub 2013 Feb 16.
10
Biological stress responses to multitasking and work interruptions: A randomized controlled trial.多任务处理和工作中断对生物应激反应的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2023 Oct;156:106358. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2023.106358. Epub 2023 Aug 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship between executive function and dual-task walking in people with Parkinson's disease.帕金森病患者执行功能与双任务步行之间的关系。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2025 Jun 18;17:1585524. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1585524. eCollection 2025.
2
Brain functional characterization of response-code conflict in dual-tasking and its modulation by age.双任务中反应代码冲突的脑功能特征及其与年龄的关系。
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Sep 9;33(18):10155-10180. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad273.

本文引用的文献

1
Characterising the unity and diversity of executive functions in a within-subject fMRI study.在一项基于被试的 fMRI 研究中,对执行功能的一致性和多样性进行特征描述。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 17;12(1):8182. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11433-z.
2
Association between spatial working memory and Re-experiencing symptoms in PTSD.创伤后应激障碍中空间工作记忆与再体验症状的关系。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2022 Jun;75:101714. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2021.101714. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
3
Bilingualism as a Slice of Swiss Cheese.双语现象就像一片瑞士奶酪。
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 8;12:769323. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.769323. eCollection 2021.
4
The working memory costs of a central attentional bottleneck in multitasking.多任务处理中心注意瓶颈的工作记忆成本。
Psychol Res. 2022 Sep;86(6):1774-1791. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01615-1. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
5
A Gratton-like effect concerning task order in dual-task situations.双任务情境中任务顺序的似格拉顿效应。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021 Jun;217:103328. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103328. Epub 2021 May 13.
6
Endogenous control of task-order preparation in variable dual tasks.内源性控制变量双任务中任务顺序准备。
Psychol Res. 2021 Feb;85(1):345-363. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01259-2. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
7
The Causal Role of the Lateral Prefrontal Cortex for Task-order Coordination in Dual-task Situations: A Study with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.外侧前额叶皮层在双重任务情境下任务顺序协调中的因果作用:一项经颅磁刺激研究。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Dec;31(12):1840-1856. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01466. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
8
The dual-task practice advantage: Empirical evidence and cognitive mechanisms.双重任务练习优势:实证证据与认知机制。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Feb;27(1):3-14. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01619-4.
9
Redefining bilingualism as a spectrum of experiences that differentially affects brain structure and function.将双语能力重新定义为一种影响大脑结构和功能的不同体验的连续体。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 9;116(15):7565-7574. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1811513116. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
10
Impact of Substance Use Disorder Pharmacotherapy on Executive Function: A Narrative Review.物质使用障碍药物治疗对执行功能的影响:一项叙述性综述。
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Mar 1;10:98. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00098. eCollection 2019.