Effect of Driving Pressure Change During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Adults With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Crossover Physiologic Study.

OBJECTIVES

Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is an effective intervention to improve gas exchange in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. However, the mortality of patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome supported with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation remains high, and this may be due in part to a lack of standardized mechanical ventilation strategies aimed at further minimizing ventilator-induced lung injury. We tested whether a continuous positive airway pressure ventilation strategy mitigates ventilator-induced lung injury in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, compared with current ventilation practice that employs tidal ventilation with limited driving pressure. We used plasma biomarkers as a surrogate outcome for ventilator-induced lung injury.

DESIGN

Randomized crossover physiologic study.

SETTING

Single-center ICU.

PATIENTS

Ten patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome supported on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

INTERVENTIONS

The study included four phases. After receiving pressure-controlled ventilation with driving pressure of 10 cm H2O for 1 hour (phase 1), patients were randomly assigned to receive first either pressure-controlled ventilation 20 cm H2O for 2 hours (phase 2) or continuous positive airway pressure for 2 hours (phase 3), and then crossover to the other phase for 2 hours; during phase 4 ventilation settings returned to baseline (pressure-controlled ventilation 10 cm H2O) for 4 hours.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

There was a linear relationship between the change in driving pressure and the plasma concentration of interleukin-6, soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products, interleukin-1ra, tumor necrosis factor alpha, surfactant protein D, and interleukin-10.

CONCLUSIONS

Ventilator-induced lung injury may occur in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation despite the delivery of volume- and pressure-limited mechanical ventilation. Reducing driving pressure to zero may provide more protective mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients supported with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. However, the risks versus benefits of such an approach need to be confirmed in studies that are designed to test patient centered outcomes.