Department of Sport, Exercise, Recreation and Kinesiology, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee.
J Strength Cond Res. 2022 Jul 1;36(7):1819-1825. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003774. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
Suarez, DG, Carroll, KM, Slaton, JA, Rochau, KG, Davis, MW, and Stone, MH. Utility of a shortened isometric midthigh pull protocol for assessing rapid force production in athletes. J Strength Cond Res 36(7): 1819-1825, 2022-The purpose of this investigation was to determine the magnitude of difference, reliability, and relationship to performance of a shortened isometric midthigh pull (IMTP) protocol. Fourteen strength-trained men (age: 26.8 ± 5.0 years, height: 176.3 ± 6.9 cm, body mass: 86.8 ± 13.9 kg, and training age: 8.5 ± 6.9 years) performed 1-second (SHORT) and traditional (TRAD) IMTP protocols during consecutive weeks. Peak force (PF), instantaneous force (90 & 200 ms), rate of force development (RFD) (0-90 ms & 0-200 ms), and impulse (0-90 ms & 0-200 ms) from each protocol were collected. Paired samples t test and Hedge's g were calculated to determine the magnitude of difference in each variable between protocols. Within-session and between-session reliability was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient, coefficient of variation, and 95% confidence intervals. Static jumps were performed to compare relationships of the IMTP variables from each protocol with jumping performance. There was no statistically significant (p > 0.05) difference in PF between the protocols (p = 0.345; g = -0.07). All early force-time variables were significantly higher in the SHORT protocol (p = <0.001-0.018; g = 0.38-0.79). The SHORT protocol resulted in more reliable RFD measures within-session. Correlations with jumping performance were mostly similar between protocols (r = 0.253-0.660). The SHORT IMTP protocol resulted in comparable PF values and considerably higher early force-time characteristics despite a restrained time to produce force and shorter rest. The SHORT protocol allows for an accurate assessment of rapid force-generating abilities while necessitating shorter collection periods than typical IMTP protocols.
苏亚雷斯、卡罗尔、斯拉顿、罗彻、戴维斯和斯通。缩短等长大腿中部拉(IMTP)协议评估运动员快速力量产生能力的效用。《力量与 Conditioning 研究》36(7):1819-1825,2022-本研究旨在确定缩短等长大腿中部拉(IMTP)协议的差异幅度、可靠性和与性能的关系。14 名力量训练男性(年龄:26.8±5.0 岁,身高:176.3±6.9cm,体重:86.8±13.9kg,训练年限:8.5±6.9 年)在连续的几周内分别进行 1 秒(SHORT)和传统(TRAD)IMTP 协议。从每个协议中收集峰值力(PF)、即时力(90ms 和 200ms)、力量发展率(RFD)(0-90ms 和 0-200ms)和冲量(0-90ms 和 0-200ms)。使用配对样本 t 检验和 Hedge's g 计算每个协议之间每个变量的差异幅度。使用组内相关系数、变异系数和 95%置信区间评估了内-.session 和间- session 可靠性。进行静态跳跃以比较每个协议的 IMTP 变量与跳跃性能的关系。两种协议之间的 PF 没有统计学上的显著差异(p>0.05)(p=0.345;g=-0.07)。所有早期的力-时间变量在 SHORT 协议中都显著更高(p=0.001-0.018;g=0.38-0.79)。SHORT 协议在 session 内产生更可靠的 RFD 测量值。与跳跃性能的相关性在两种协议之间大多相似(r=0.253-0.660)。尽管限制了产生力的时间且休息时间更短,SHORT IMTP 协议仍能产生可比的 PF 值和明显更高的早期力-时间特征。SHORT 协议允许对快速力量产生能力进行准确评估,同时需要比典型的 IMTP 协议更短的采集时间。