Grgic Jozo, Scapec Bela, Mikulic Pavle, Pedisic Zeljko
Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia.
Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Biol Sport. 2022 Mar;39(2):407-414. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2022.106149. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
The aim of this systematic review was to explore the test-retest reliability of isometric mid-thigh pull maximum strength assessment. We searched through five databases to find studies that examined the test-retest reliability of peak force in the isometric mid-thigh pull exercise. From each included study, we extracted intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) and/or coefficient of variation (CV). The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the COSMIN checklist. A total of 16 good-to-excellent quality studies were included in the review. When considering results from all included studies, ICCs ranged from 0.73 to 0.99 (median ICC = 0.96), where 78% of ICCs were ≥ 0.90, and 98% of ICCs were ≥ 0.75. The range of reported CVs was from 0.7% to 11.1% (median CV = 4.9%), where 58% of CVs were ≤ 5%. Reliability was also good-to-excellent for both relative and absolute peak force and for both bilateral and unilateral isometric mid-thigh pull tests. The majority of studies did not find significant differences between testing sessions. It can be concluded that the isometric mid-thigh pull maximum strength assessment has good-to-excellent test-retest reliability. The isometric mid-thigh pull maximum strength assessment can be used as a reliable test in sports practice and for research purposes.
本系统评价的目的是探讨等长中大腿拉最大力量评估的重测信度。我们检索了五个数据库,以查找检验等长中大腿拉练习中峰值力重测信度的研究。从每项纳入研究中,我们提取了组内相关系数(ICC)和/或变异系数(CV)。使用COSMIN清单评估纳入研究的方法学质量。本评价共纳入16项质量良好至优秀的研究。综合所有纳入研究的结果来看,ICC范围为0.73至0.99(ICC中位数 = 0.96),其中78%的ICC≥0.90,98%的ICC≥0.75。报告的CV范围为0.7%至11.1%(CV中位数 = 4.9%),其中58%的CV≤5%。相对和绝对峰值力以及双侧和单侧等长中大腿拉测试的信度也良好至优秀。大多数研究未发现测试环节之间存在显著差异。可以得出结论,等长中大腿拉最大力量评估具有良好至优秀的重测信度。等长中大腿拉最大力量评估可作为运动实践和研究目的的可靠测试。