• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[跟踪与激情犯罪:一个关于前伴侣跟踪案例的讨论]

[Stalking and crimes of passion : Discussion of a case example on ex-partner stalking].

作者信息

Dreßing Harald, Saß Henning

机构信息

Zentralinstitut für seelische Gesundheit, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, 68159, Mannheim, Deutschland.

Klinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik, Universitätsklinikum RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Deutschland.

出版信息

Nervenarzt. 2021 Jul;92(7):694-700. doi: 10.1007/s00115-020-01017-5.

DOI:10.1007/s00115-020-01017-5
PMID:33044579
Abstract

Forensic scientists have proposed various evaluation criteria for assessing the criminal responsibility in violent acts against relationship partners under exceptional affective circumstances. Of particular importance, apart from the offender's condition at the time of the offence, are the previous history and the background of the relationship. Although each individual case requires special weighting of the individual aspects, the clinical judgment must always be based on an overall view of the offender and the crime. This article investigates the question of the extent to which empirical findings from stalking research can contribute to the assessment of crimes of passion.

摘要

法医科学家们提出了各种评估标准,用于在特殊情感情况下对针对亲密伴侣的暴力行为刑事责任进行评估。除犯罪时犯罪者的状况外,关系的既往历史和背景尤为重要。尽管每个案件都需要对各个方面进行特殊权衡,但临床判断必须始终基于对犯罪者和犯罪行为的全面考量。本文探讨了跟踪骚扰研究的实证结果在多大程度上有助于激情犯罪评估这一问题。

相似文献

1
[Stalking and crimes of passion : Discussion of a case example on ex-partner stalking].[跟踪与激情犯罪:一个关于前伴侣跟踪案例的讨论]
Nervenarzt. 2021 Jul;92(7):694-700. doi: 10.1007/s00115-020-01017-5.
2
[Differentiation of impulsive crimes from crimes of passion].
Nervenarzt. 2007 Nov;78(11):1283-9. doi: 10.1007/s00115-007-2318-9.
3
Stalkers: Specialists Versus Generalists.跟踪者:专家与通才
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Sep;37(17-18):NP16779-NP16798. doi: 10.1177/08862605211023501. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
4
The Intersection of Stalking and the Severity of Intimate Partner Abuse.跟踪行为与亲密伴侣虐待严重程度的交叉点。
Violence Vict. 2018 Apr 1;33(2):218-238. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-16-00193.
5
Stalking Recidivism: A Comparison of Operational Definitions.跟踪累犯:操作定义的比较
J Interpers Violence. 2022 May;37(9-10):NP8138-NP8160. doi: 10.1177/0886260520975857. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
6
True self-attributions shape judgments of blame in the context of addiction-relevant crime.真实的自我归因塑造了与成瘾相关犯罪背景下的指责判断。
Addict Behav. 2022 Jul;130:107287. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107287. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
7
Stalking: A Multidimensional Framework for Assessment and Safety Planning. stalking:评估和安全规划的多维框架。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2017 Apr;18(2):200-222. doi: 10.1177/1524838015603210. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
8
The Wheel of Change Moves On: Assessing the Severity of Stalking Behavior.变革之轮继续转动:评估跟踪行为的严重程度。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Aug;37(15-16):NP14672-NP14694. doi: 10.1177/08862605211015216. Epub 2021 May 8.
9
Are stalkers disordered or criminal? Thoughts on the psychopathology of stalking. stalking 者是否存在心理障碍或犯罪?关于 stalking 心理病理学的思考。
Psychopathology. 2011;44(5):277-82. doi: 10.1159/000325060. Epub 2011 Jun 9.
10
The neo-criminalization of stalking in the Portuguese legal system.
J Forensic Leg Med. 2018 Aug;58:199-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2018.07.004. Epub 2018 Jul 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Stalking and serious violence.跟踪与严重暴力行为。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2003;31(4):432-9.
2
[Crimes of affect].[情感犯罪]
Nervenarzt. 1983 Nov;54(11):557-72.