James David V, Farnham Frank R
North London Forensic Service, Chase Farm Hospital, Enfield, UK.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2003;31(4):432-9.
Studies of violence in stalking have treated interpersonal violence as a homogeneous phenomenon. This study was conducted to ascertain whether the associations of serious violence in stalking are the same as those of general violence in stalking. Of 85 stalkers referred to a forensic service, those who had committed acts of serious violence (homicide and serious assaults) were compared with those who had not on preselected clinical, demographic, and criminological variables. Associations of serious violence were found to differ from those reported for general violence. In particular, serious violence was significantly associated with an absence of criminal convictions and the presence of employment. There was no association with substance abuse, previous convictions for violence, or personality disorder. Different degrees of violence have different associations. This has implications for the development of violence prediction instruments and for violence prevention in stalking.
对跟踪骚扰中暴力行为的研究将人际暴力视为一种同质现象。本研究旨在确定跟踪骚扰中严重暴力行为的关联是否与一般暴力行为的关联相同。在转介至法医服务机构的85名跟踪骚扰者中,将实施过严重暴力行为(杀人及严重袭击)的人与未实施过此类行为的人,就预先选定的临床、人口统计学和犯罪学变量进行了比较。结果发现,严重暴力行为的关联与一般暴力行为的关联不同。特别是,严重暴力行为与无刑事定罪及有工作显著相关。与药物滥用、先前暴力犯罪定罪或人格障碍无关。不同程度的暴力行为有不同的关联。这对暴力预测工具的开发以及跟踪骚扰中的暴力预防具有启示意义。