D'Amato Dalia, Bartkowski Bartosz, Droste Nils
Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science - Department of Forest Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Department of Economics, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.
Ambio. 2020 Dec;49(12):1878-1896. doi: 10.1007/s13280-020-01374-0. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
The bioeconomy is currently being globally promoted as a sustainability avenue involving several societal actors. While the bioeconomy is broadly about the substitution of fossil resources with bio-based ones, three main (competing or complementary) bioeconomy visions are emerging in scientific literature: resource, biotechnology, and agroecology. The implementation of one or more of these visions into strategies implies changes to land use and thus ecosystem services delivery, with notable trade-offs. This review aims to explore the interdisciplinary space at the interface of these two concepts. We reviewed scientific publications explicitly referring to bioeconomy and ecosystem services in their title, abstract, or keywords, with 45 documents identified as relevant. The literature appeared to be emerging and fragmented but eight themes were discernible (in order of decreasing occurrence frequency in the literature): a. technical and economic feasibility of biomass extraction and use; b. potential and challenges of the bioeconomy; c. frameworks and tools; d. sustainability of bio-based processes, products, and services; e. environmental sustainability of the bioeconomy; f. governance of the bioeconomy; g. biosecurity; h. bioremediation. Approximately half of the documents aligned to a resource vision of the bioeconomy, with emphasis on biomass production. Agroecology and biotechnology visions were less frequently found, but multiple visions generally tended to occur in each document. The discussion highlights gaps in the current research on the topic and argues for communication between the ecosystem services and bioeconomy communities to forward both research areas in the context of sustainability science.
生物经济目前在全球范围内作为一条涉及多个社会行为主体的可持续发展途径而得到推广。虽然生物经济大致是关于用生物基资源替代化石资源,但科学文献中正在出现三种主要的(相互竞争或互补的)生物经济愿景:资源、生物技术和农业生态。将这些愿景中的一种或多种纳入战略意味着土地利用的变化,进而影响生态系统服务的提供,这会带来显著的权衡取舍。本综述旨在探索这两个概念界面处的跨学科领域。我们查阅了在标题、摘要或关键词中明确提及生物经济和生态系统服务的科学出版物,共识别出45篇相关文献。这些文献似乎尚在兴起且较为零散,但可辨别出八个主题(按在文献中出现频率从高到低排序):a. 生物质提取和利用的技术与经济可行性;b. 生物经济的潜力与挑战;c. 框架与工具;d. 生物基工艺、产品和服务的可持续性;e. 生物经济的环境可持续性;f. 生物经济的治理;g. 生物安全;h. 生物修复。约一半的文献符合生物经济的资源愿景,重点是生物质生产。农业生态和生物技术愿景的文献较少见,但每份文献中通常倾向于出现多种愿景。讨论突出了当前该主题研究中的差距,并主张生态系统服务和生物经济领域的研究者进行交流,以便在可持续性科学的背景下推动这两个研究领域的发展。