Department of Social Sciences, Public Administration and Policy Group, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 EW, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Ambio. 2022 Oct;51(10):2079-2090. doi: 10.1007/s13280-022-01730-2. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
The transition towards a circular bioeconomy (CBE) in the European Union is not without contestation. In particular, research has highlighted potential trade-offs of the large-scale production of bio-resources, for instance with environmental quality goals. To date, however, it remains underexplored in the CBE literature how controversies develop throughout a transition process. To address this gap, this paper explores where controversies are situated in a transition, how they change throughout, and how they influence the transition process. First, we suggest that controversies can be situated on and between different system layers within a transition. Second, we offer an explanation of how controversies evolve, as actors confirm, integrate, disintegrate and polarize underlying storylines. Third, these controversies can have both productive and unproductive outcomes while they unfold throughout a transition. We illustrate this understanding with the example of biorefineries as CBE key technology and discuss a research agenda on controversies in sustainability transitions.
向循环生物经济(CBE)的转变在欧盟并非没有争议。特别是,研究已经强调了大规模生产生物资源的潜在权衡,例如与环境质量目标的权衡。然而,迄今为止,CBE 文献中仍未充分探讨在整个过渡过程中争议是如何发展的。为了解决这一差距,本文探讨了争议在过渡过程中的位置、它们如何随着时间的推移而变化,以及它们如何影响过渡过程。首先,我们认为争议可以存在于过渡过程中的不同系统层次之间。其次,我们提供了一个关于争议如何演变的解释,即行为体如何确认、整合、分解和极化潜在的故事情节。第三,这些争议在整个过渡过程中展开时可能会产生有成效和无成效的结果。我们用生物炼制厂作为 CBE 关键技术的例子来说明这种理解,并讨论了关于可持续性转型中争议的研究议程。