Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2020 Oct-Dec;11(4):195-207. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1818876. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
A first therapeutic target of somatic genome editing (SGE) is sickle cell disease (SCD), the most commonly inherited blood disorders, affecting more than 100,000 individuals in the United States. Advancement of SGE is contingent on patient participation in first in human clinical trials. However, seriously ill patients may be vulnerable to overestimating the benefits of early phase studies while underestimating the risks. Therefore, ensuring potential clinical trial participants are fully informed prior to participating in a SGE clinical trial is critical. We conducted a mixed-methods study of adults with SCD as well as parents and physicians of individuals with SCD. Participants were asked to complete a genetic literacy survey, watch an educational video about genome editing, complete a two-part survey, and take part in focus group discussions. Focus groups addressed topics on clinical trials, ethics of gene editing, and what is not understood regarding gene editing. All focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using conventional content analysis techniques to identify major themes. Our study examined the views of SCD stakeholders regarding what they want and need to know about genome editing to make an informed decision to participate in a SGE clinical trial. Prominent themes included stakeholders' desire to understand treatment side effects, mechanism of action of SGE, trial qualification criteria, and the impact of SGE on quality of life. In addition, some physicians expressed concerns about the extent to which their patients would understand concepts related to SGE; however, individuals with SCD demonstrated higher levels of genetic literacy than estimated by physicians. Designing ethically robust genome editing clinical trials for the SCD population will require, at a minimum, addressing the expressed information needs of the community through culturally sensitive engagement, so that they can make informed decisions to consider participation in clinical trials.
体细胞基因组编辑 (SGE) 的第一个治疗目标是镰状细胞病 (SCD),这是最常见的遗传性血液疾病,在美国影响超过 100,000 人。SGE 的进展取决于患者参与首次人体临床试验。然而,重病患者可能容易高估早期研究的益处,而低估风险。因此,在参加 SGE 临床试验之前,确保潜在的临床试验参与者充分了解情况至关重要。
我们对 SCD 成人以及 SCD 患者的父母和医生进行了一项混合方法研究。参与者被要求完成一项基因素养调查、观看有关基因组编辑的教育视频、完成两部分调查,并参加焦点小组讨论。焦点小组讨论了临床试验、基因编辑伦理以及对基因编辑不了解的主题。所有焦点小组的讨论都进行了录音、转录,并使用常规内容分析技术进行分析,以确定主要主题。
我们的研究调查了 SCD 利益相关者对他们需要了解基因组编辑的哪些方面以便做出明智的决定来参与 SGE 临床试验的看法。突出的主题包括利益相关者希望了解治疗副作用、SGE 的作用机制、试验资格标准以及 SGE 对生活质量的影响。此外,一些医生对他们的患者理解与 SGE 相关的概念的程度表示担忧;然而,SCD 患者的基因素养水平高于医生估计。
为 SCD 人群设计符合伦理的稳健基因组编辑临床试验,至少需要通过文化敏感的参与来满足社区表达的信息需求,以便他们能够做出知情决定,考虑参与临床试验。